[netmod] netconf-config-change and NMDA

Michal Vaško <mvasko@cesnet.cz> Tue, 05 March 2019 13:32 UTC

Return-Path: <mvasko@cesnet.cz>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D08991310F6; Tue, 5 Mar 2019 05:32:13 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cesnet.cz
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XJZixwGYn1WY; Tue, 5 Mar 2019 05:32:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from kalendar.cesnet.cz (kalendar.cesnet.cz [78.128.211.34]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B34741310A6; Tue, 5 Mar 2019 05:32:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: by kalendar.cesnet.cz (Postfix, from userid 999) id 0E007604E8; Tue, 5 Mar 2019 14:32:08 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cesnet.cz; s=kalendar; t=1551792728; bh=e7gs2I/DQgLKLc46kGprNn2cLM6h/a7fuoXzg8//C+g=; h=From:Date:Cc:To:Subject; b=ojM3A3RuxmDKnruXhKjH31uRsHSOJi5kJ/cMpWwz5AvngVW2dayFHYWPo1LEaFUkv B18RHFD112GPgsooGgwui2yTE0DnhY9UETKw8jBXZIif8l5neeLKccU55cJhoqEJZw toJ/Io80vHNsC8CpwVY/Dr9LBjIJj3SQRXbq94KI=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
From: =?utf-8?q?Michal_Va=C5=A1ko?= <mvasko@cesnet.cz>
X-Forward: 2001:67c:1220:80c:b5:55d3:81d5:8636
Date: Tue, 05 Mar 2019 14:32:08 +0100
Cc: "netconf" <netconf@ietf.org>
To: "netmod" <netmod@ietf.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <4a3-5c7e7a80-3-125b9e20@241827065>
User-Agent: SOGoMail 2.3.23
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/XdB_fnmBlWga7Xc9gai2hFG8zeA>
Subject: [netmod] netconf-config-change and NMDA
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Mar 2019 13:32:14 -0000

Hi,
I have encountered a problem while validating ietf-netconf-notifications netconf-config-change notification while following NMDA. The RFC [1] says that the "target" instance-identifier in this notification should be validated against operational datastore. In my use-case there was a running datastore modification and the "target" was not found in the operational datastore so the notification failed to be validated. I still believe the notification should be valid and this seems to be the result of a flaw in the specification somewhere. Thanks for any input.

Regards,
Michal

[1] https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc8342#section-6.1