Re: [netmod] 6991bis - Any plans to add more URI Syntax components?

Mahesh Jethanandani <mjethanandani@gmail.com> Mon, 30 September 2019 21:27 UTC

Return-Path: <mjethanandani@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEEC012013D for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Sep 2019 14:27:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Mv0dOuKOYtWO for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Sep 2019 14:27:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pg1-x52d.google.com (mail-pg1-x52d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::52d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3B45812007C for <netmod@ietf.org>; Mon, 30 Sep 2019 14:27:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pg1-x52d.google.com with SMTP id e1so2553362pgj.6 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Mon, 30 Sep 2019 14:27:52 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=8/XMdXH07NtFtAwMWN9YMl4FXzbo/vuYhzVJQRZn32c=; b=s8bpApV53gR1HxABH4KAWK2Fkgbxa60gESu6QIO7rJnUx4cAntFyykcfDgY0acaPJB Pl8P6lZ2Qc85jvWQYAeyGcgnCc5EpO/KKQRQJS/znOy6I//ViqMg7FRdHmU5Gtx84CoV d+/D8DBQQAc5u/5i9HfRnLtHx7h3a75fCMmwkCA/JAykDZMvvaBiSTRBrk9EHGTBwUsN 9VMekmdCwC4BLidis6i0qrCiV2FIzMwQpNkONR+ccegz8x+rq3eOkeP23oQ3N4XaupMt b4gpWbD9sLUrYUEnP7LE2P30B54Usfsu4d8/2Bv9KyxBUWiwjYZ/z2FxNHDTXj2t0vps lmNw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=8/XMdXH07NtFtAwMWN9YMl4FXzbo/vuYhzVJQRZn32c=; b=iWbuKpOwgEK+0leIZphUxzcHWehHpabor5gGPwNg7tf9DXg5XDeQoHBOr7AECM2rNY /pV0WbVAXyond80hQ/JlxiXE94jO7iibiFZ7n0s0wuOF51WaBaN8D380VzgkNy9/OS0D vh1mghALGkiIGFq7McMqZCE0ma7YU4Ffk4wukal507xOAGT4/Qh8v77LB3JHaznPFurl q+h4d8LMMIrtRAR1xcLmCbzJ4RGDmg8Dt7WFal2RieQipAOOZ7XY3cl1zqn9Wo5CI3qz +HjPmo+9xOimOyLY7c8KyBEVGf31DSIAZS6raqcV6V4bFqW0TtNKZDcV3s++dkiYAXVR zd8w==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUug+/M1sAbY3uylPu9fiBWsFS4iRmfAoMDB1C85lEme0p6mwsr mK45APseYAWyFsKglmfvkm+/bgyx
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxlO/WQ9GLslQT0ugxRk0J3gcGo/pPNnBDp13miGTNTvfRAWI35dzx23xEvZORCRSs0/bh60g==
X-Received: by 2002:a63:6e85:: with SMTP id j127mr27021703pgc.326.1569878871516; Mon, 30 Sep 2019 14:27:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.33.123.155] ([66.170.99.2]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u9sm12969253pfl.138.2019.09.30.14.27.50 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 30 Sep 2019 14:27:50 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\))
From: Mahesh Jethanandani <mjethanandani@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20190928085715.oo457rppqxcmd2qx@anna.jacobs.jacobs-university.de>
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2019 14:27:49 -0700
Cc: netmod <netmod@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <3090E658-652B-43CA-A777-180EA4875200@gmail.com>
References: <8F6D6E58-CCB2-4404-AFB1-876EBE5721E7@gmail.com> <20190928085715.oo457rppqxcmd2qx@anna.jacobs.jacobs-university.de>
To: Juergen Schoenwaelder <J.Schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/XzR1Qz1YVTZpC72-b-6aqdd7LdQ>
Subject: Re: [netmod] 6991bis - Any plans to add more URI Syntax components?
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2019 21:27:54 -0000

Hi Juergen,

> On Sep 28, 2019, at 1:57 AM, Schönwälder, Jürgen <J.Schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de> wrote:
> 
> Hi Mahesh,
> 
> are these frequently needed? Are there YANG modules that use these
> fields already?

Over in ETSI, I just added them to the YANG model that defines VNF Descriptors (VNFD), as part of what is called VnfConfigurableProperties.

In addition, I know that draft-kwatsen-netconf-http-client-server draft tries to define 'user-id'. And there has been discussion around draft-ietf-netconf-https-notif needing to define a ‘path’ attribute, although Martin does not think it is needed. Anyway, these are the instances I know of that could use these definitions. I am sure there are more.

Cheers.

> 
> /js
> 
> On Fri, Sep 27, 2019 at 06:39:54PM -0700, Mahesh Jethanandani wrote:
>> Hi Juergen,
>> 
>> Is there a plan to add more URI syntax components in rfc6991bis? I know there is a typedef for uri, but I was looking specifically for the following that are defined in RFC 3986.
>> Scheme
>> Authority field including
>> User information
>> Path
>> Query
>> Fragment
>> 
>> Thanks.
>> 
>> Mahesh Jethanandani
>> mjethanandani@gmail.com
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> netmod mailing list
>> netmod@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
> 
> 
> -- 
> Juergen Schoenwaelder           Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH
> Phone: +49 421 200 3587         Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany
> Fax:   +49 421 200 3103         <https://www.jacobs-university.de/>

Mahesh Jethanandani
mjethanandani@gmail.com