Re: [netmod] Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-netmod-entity-05

Dan Romascanu <dromasca@gmail.com> Tue, 28 November 2017 19:20 UTC

Return-Path: <dromasca@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1DA9126CF9; Tue, 28 Nov 2017 11:20:58 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GAI5zh6vpZ5O; Tue, 28 Nov 2017 11:20:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qt0-x22f.google.com (mail-qt0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c0d::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1E1851200CF; Tue, 28 Nov 2017 11:20:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qt0-x22f.google.com with SMTP id u42so1287166qte.7; Tue, 28 Nov 2017 11:20:53 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=1Bkz3q4fNtRjFmFN8z5aJTfIkjo7h4AWJSf54iZ15kM=; b=Ka+3Lsn4UMU71DZMRV/f0yP91RAJyqVOqcWdsIpcm/OhulWzifTwwiN8ZQX9cz+UMS 6I+G1LqM7zyj4wNgs7Eps8e05CGsptjxs7FrF2AHMIi4SMqU0qjSH0TgcQXjFQX4FtPJ jw0mBwU5SJ8X0O8q0hwJt1pW6M8oOtwWuqgrRdNVrKgJcsef2j+8nt8vnhoW3OPZRlBQ EF3RC2V/njwV6KqJX1cjdl0Pk1g0eEdMFwd9T5qYkcXzF8CNoOk/58SXZ0ouybWLyNpq 6FpDIOLjHNmwa/fYIuNiDvPPBaQcFvGycySqhuJXisDsutxSBmsjVRMY9k4KSVWlJze9 hEWA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=1Bkz3q4fNtRjFmFN8z5aJTfIkjo7h4AWJSf54iZ15kM=; b=VRmjA8Mlr9YBMGUmnTJ16nGeVY6xIbSWfOEHvUdR/LeRT0PnG7I03/iFZdKSesZW8b SRVkGs5bwvfIbLUCt4jkmNWnR6Wtow5SuMQsgxcKTVbGAAPALl9clwfoSQeFA1q8gZSD 6dixu0J0dO5p4SP3IhjV9AU+bEpXJ2/+L/O4W/4EJjkyrb197r4iSDy6xxPAyBkXZdAz dS7b9jOEUVKXNcPF8FTMlOOgQLHhHb8MteylW2PUObsqDzA8+ALmfmF1mJGwB/L8DwUW F8GLLXwu4jB7x7X5ZX/Ip4CthyF7GnRFWOwDRaMZrAytqJROwiMN7nEW++XPJ73ESGcs dxzA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AJaThX6aJbv47yrEWpufCPbQXuS+nDpqjqA7WrkYRBoPksEKeSfE6v+q RLWt79Cyl2qIPS9bGIkX0PVHMpFa0dqfRREXkqo=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGs4zMa5mApt4bUiDM9ic9Vea5j/n00uYWKcTfc+xIpV/N+7ynpwL+aGvs+cyiepfqfZc57c4i+v7xVGZhyazPyCS/s=
X-Received: by 10.200.15.2 with SMTP id e2mr381024qtk.69.1511896852240; Tue, 28 Nov 2017 11:20:52 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.140.106.166 with HTTP; Tue, 28 Nov 2017 11:20:51 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <56c5dbed-0fcd-516d-cdb0-e38180e390c8@labn.net>
References: <56c5dbed-0fcd-516d-cdb0-e38180e390c8@labn.net>
From: Dan Romascanu <dromasca@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2017 21:20:51 +0200
Message-ID: <CAFgnS4UyPk7Cy4KKU7=gswZu2mFsAD-_JoLjpXtMG_jNV=d9eA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>
Cc: Andy Bierman <andy@yumaworks.com>, Martin Bjorklund <mbj@tail-f.com>, Jie Dong <jie.dong@huawei.com>, NetMod WG Chairs <netmod-chairs@ietf.org>, NetMod WG <netmod@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="94eb2c0399b4d09d51055f0feafa"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/YX3Ygf9IXgqTdoW96PGNpLDNh_M>
Subject: Re: [netmod] Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-netmod-entity-05
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2017 19:20:59 -0000

No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft.

Regards,

Dan


On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 9:06 PM, Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net> wrote:

> Authors, Contributors, WG,
>
> As part of the preparation for WG Last Call:
>
> Are you aware of any IPR that applies to drafts identified above?
>
> Please state either:
>
> "No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft"
> or
> "Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft"
>
> If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules
> (see RFCs 3669, 5378 and 8179 for more details)?
>
> If yes to the above, please state either:
>
> "Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules"
> or
> "No, the IPR has not been disclosed"
>
> If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think
> appropriate.
>
> If you are listed as a document author or contributor please answer the
> above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not you are
> aware of any relevant IPR. This document will not advance to the next
> stage until a response has been received from each author and listed
> contributor. NOTE: THIS APPLIES TO ALL OF YOU LISTED IN THIS MESSAGE'S
> TO LINES.
>
> If you are on the WG email list or attend WG meetings but are not listed
> as an author or contributor, we remind you of your obligations under
> the IETF IPR rules which encourages you to notify the IETF if you are
> aware of IPR of others on an IETF contribution, or to refrain from
> participating in any contribution or discussion related to your
> undisclosed IPR. For more information, please see the RFCs listed above
> and
> http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/wiki/IntellectualProperty.
>
> Thank you,
> NetMod WG Chairs
>
> PS Please include all listed in the headers of this message in your
> response.
>
>
>