IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [netmod] type equivalence

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Mon, 22 February 2021 14:20 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E6993A09BE for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Feb 2021 06:20:11 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id biX4T491a8Av for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Feb 2021 06:20:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de [134.102.50.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7B3443A09E1 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Mon, 22 Feb 2021 06:20:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.217.118] (p5089a828.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [80.137.168.40]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4Dkkpq0dk7zySZ; Mon, 22 Feb 2021 15:20:03 +0100 (CET)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.4\))
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <20210222141715.vhzqka77yzhbkpst@anna.jacobs.jacobs-university.de>
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2021 15:20:02 +0100
Cc: Martin Björklund <mbj+ietf@4668.se>, netmod@ietf.org
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 635696402.6347049-330bbe913a04cae9d4e2a5183849d382
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <450E683C-4F47-4314-BA63-DAC17AF60970@tzi.org>
References: <20210222092455.qupjm2d4lpm4ay4n@anna.jacobs.jacobs-university.de> <20210222.104938.680142326480637892.id@4668.se> <20210222100857.ovetw7udo4ccbezx@anna.jacobs.jacobs-university.de> <20210222.111343.254950973345362316.id@4668.se> <04B94A94-236A-44CE-B47C-BE5F36FFF278@tzi.org> <20210222135333.t4hfa3ekguwm33pm@anna.jacobs.jacobs-university.de> <C83451C6-56D2-4A95-A0FE-66197E7DFB59@tzi.org> <20210222141715.vhzqka77yzhbkpst@anna.jacobs.jacobs-university.de>
To: Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.4)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/Yj7KvGvXlekWxKlu4JgqwXssIBM>
Subject: Re: [netmod] type equivalence
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2021 14:20:11 -0000

On 2021-02-22, at 15:17, Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de> wrote:
> 
> I guess considering the built-in types as incompatible is the most
> robust approach. If we agree that RFC 7950 tried to say this, we could
> file an errata and propose clearer language.

Right.  And we can keep the COMI key-to-URL mapping as is, as this clarification is necessary for its correct functioning.

Grüße, Carsten

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email