Re: [netmod] referencing the tree-diagrams draft

Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net> Thu, 07 December 2017 20:38 UTC

Return-Path: <lberger@labn.net>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF1A2126CC4 for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Dec 2017 12:38:58 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-2.8, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (768-bit key) header.d=labn.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GmWx6QWUY9CU for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Dec 2017 12:38:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gproxy2-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com (gproxy2-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com [69.89.18.3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 05328124B09 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Thu, 7 Dec 2017 12:38:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from CMOut01 (unknown [10.0.90.82]) by gproxy2.mail.unifiedlayer.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D57771E0D88 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Thu, 7 Dec 2017 13:38:55 -0700 (MST)
Received: from box313.bluehost.com ([69.89.31.113]) by CMOut01 with id j8es1w00F2SSUrH018evPh; Thu, 07 Dec 2017 13:38:55 -0700
X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.2 cv=VcCHBBh9 c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=h1BC+oY+fLhyFmnTBx92Jg==:117 a=h1BC+oY+fLhyFmnTBx92Jg==:17 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=xqWC_Br6kY4A:10 a=ocR9PWop10UA:10 a=48vgC7mUAAAA:8 a=Jovm65r4E1pkkVwkgUsA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=w1C3t2QeGrPiZgrLijVG:22
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=labn.net; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version :Date:Message-ID:From:References:To:Subject:Sender:Reply-To:Cc:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=PZDwD6reSCmNhx84pgsWj/NsXsu9wIt3vJQxwX+ehhE=; b=2XzfMAwmsfAzLmniM4va6Mp/z0 sQ1Mk1ccARJp0upgjH3p8XTB8WAoxtoaiRT/Fv/U9CGxU4kjaSKWbnKQqeI0b8vdK/jWOSgjkQAqI V7Id4sqJcx/AH1oxj+tC/qVU4;
Received: from pool-100-15-86-101.washdc.fios.verizon.net ([100.15.86.101]:42822 helo=[IPv6:::1]) by box313.bluehost.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from <lberger@labn.net>) id 1eN2wW-0021AJ-5z; Thu, 07 Dec 2017 13:38:52 -0700
To: Kent Watsen <kwatsen@juniper.net>, "netmod@ietf.org" <netmod@ietf.org>
References: <8999577A-227E-4F59-A4C4-23AED7AD8576@juniper.net>
From: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>
Message-ID: <04d3a2fa-ee5b-0d8a-3b0c-32786de7ecd0@labn.net>
Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2017 15:38:49 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <8999577A-227E-4F59-A4C4-23AED7AD8576@juniper.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - box313.bluehost.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - labn.net
X-BWhitelist: no
X-Source-IP: 100.15.86.101
X-Exim-ID: 1eN2wW-0021AJ-5z
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
X-Source-Sender: pool-100-15-86-101.washdc.fios.verizon.net ([IPv6:::1]) [100.15.86.101]:42822
X-Source-Auth: lberger@labn.net
X-Email-Count: 3
X-Source-Cap: bGFibm1vYmk7bGFibm1vYmk7Ym94MzEzLmJsdWVob3N0LmNvbQ==
X-Local-Domain: yes
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/YnL5WPMLfEqWFXAh1QdVxgMPU4s>
Subject: Re: [netmod] referencing the tree-diagrams draft
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Dec 2017 20:38:59 -0000

Kent,

On 12/7/2017 3:19 PM, Kent Watsen wrote:
> All,
>
> Looking at a few drafts going through last call currently, I notice that they all define their own "Tree Diagrams" section rather than reference the tree-diagrams draft:
>
>   https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-netmod-entity-05#section-1.1.1
>   https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-netmod-rfc7277bis-00#section-1.3
>   https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-netmod-rfc7223bis-00#section-1.3
>
> I realize that the tree-diagrams draft isn't published yet, but my understanding is that its Last Call is imminent.  With that in mind, *should* these three drafts (and, by extension, all drafts going forward) be updated to reference the tree-diagrams draft?  - or are we currently in a grey area where it's a "may" until the tree-diagrams draft is published, at which time it becomes a "must"?
I think we're close enough to risk the MISREF state, ie.e., I think the
drafts should point to tree diagrams.

Lou
(Co-author and co-chair...)

> Kent  // co-chair
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> netmod mailing list
> netmod@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
>