Re: [netmod] IANA Considerations
Martin Bjorklund <mbj@tail-f.com> Tue, 23 October 2018 18:45 UTC
Return-Path: <mbj@tail-f.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4975130EEC for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Oct 2018 11:45:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gL00wS5jcnlJ for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Oct 2018 11:45:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.tail-f.com (mail.tail-f.com [46.21.102.45]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B97E7130E1D for <netmod@ietf.org>; Tue, 23 Oct 2018 11:45:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (h-80-27.A165.priv.bahnhof.se [212.85.80.27]) by mail.tail-f.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 07A641AE0187; Tue, 23 Oct 2018 20:45:33 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2018 20:45:32 +0200
Message-Id: <20181023.204532.775277363389220964.mbj@tail-f.com>
To: j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de
Cc: ietfc@btconnect.com, netmod@ietf.org
From: Martin Bjorklund <mbj@tail-f.com>
In-Reply-To: <20181023180438.b5yvycioj77mrjkt@anna.jacobs.jacobs-university.de>
References: <02f701d46aeb$65533e00$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net> <20181023180438.b5yvycioj77mrjkt@anna.jacobs.jacobs-university.de>
X-Mailer: Mew version 6.7 on Emacs 24.5 / Mule 6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/YrWE6mivHV62a4y3zYa3ZdSACQE>
Subject: Re: [netmod] IANA Considerations
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2018 18:45:36 -0000
Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de> wrote: > Tom, > > the IANA registry has this field, I assume it got introduced when IANA > started to maintain their own modules and needed a flag to distinguish > them from other modules. Martin may know more. If you think this is a > problem, the authors can remove 'Maintained by IANA?: N' strictly > following RFC 6020 and IANA will then add this bit later during the > IANA processing. I don't know more. I will check with IANA. /martin > > /js > > On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 04:15:04PM +0000, tom petch wrote: > > draft-ietf-ccamp-mw-yang-10 > > has, in IANA Considerations, > > Name: ietf-microwave-radio-link > > Maintained by IANA?: N > > Namespace: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-microwave-radio-link > > Prefix: mrl > > Reference: RFC XXXX > > which adds a line I have not seen before, not mentioned - naturally - in > > RFC6020 or RFC7950 nor does it appear in e.g. RFC8407. > > > > It seems like 'A Good Thing' but where has it come from, what is the > > basis for it and is there a reference for it? It could be construed as > > a breach of RFC6020. > > > > Tom Petch > > > > _______________________________________________ > > netmod mailing list > > netmod@ietf.org > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod > > -- > Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH > Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany > Fax: +49 421 200 3103 <https://www.jacobs-university.de/> > > _______________________________________________ > netmod mailing list > netmod@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod >
- [netmod] IANA Considerations tom petch
- Re: [netmod] IANA Considerations Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [netmod] IANA Considerations Martin Bjorklund
- Re: [netmod] IANA Considerations Martin Bjorklund