Re: [netmod] IPR poll on WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-intf-ext-yang-07
David Ball <daviball@cisco.com> Thu, 11 July 2019 08:50 UTC
Return-Path: <daviball@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A24E71202B1 for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Jul 2019 01:50:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.5
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.5 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5C4sb0ygn-gv for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Jul 2019 01:50:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aer-iport-4.cisco.com (aer-iport-4.cisco.com [173.38.203.54]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E4A69120291 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Jul 2019 01:50:45 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=6915; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1562835046; x=1564044646; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=JO6gYMKgj1JGzAQ5CaaHCGqP3RwU/exsVbqXK1qhcUw=; b=gTnrnm92GybRxjoyCEDBfn/XNR0vWBt8e+VbLDDxDb7ry3mHeLPqbe0B r93QyUJ5HhGB7FiyLgnx4Uwkzr4zaXMGHzPqJO9P4dY0Uvp3skhXLPtOS 6Uur4dXWaO9rAr1/jhGR2y5L0Zt/I37F2l+A+n6wA6cBDQ/s8TIM557e1 M=;
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="5.63,478,1557187200"; d="scan'208,217"; a="14127467"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-2.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 11 Jul 2019 08:50:43 +0000
Received: from [10.63.23.113] (dhcp-ensft1-uk-vla370-10-63-23-113.cisco.com [10.63.23.113]) by aer-core-2.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x6B8ohYT011395; Thu, 11 Jul 2019 08:50:43 GMT
To: Kent Watsen <kent+ietf@watsen.net>, "Rob Wilton (rwilton)" <rwilton@cisco.com>, Tapraj Singh <tapsingh@cisco.com>, Selvakumar Sivaraj <ssivaraj@juniper.net>
Cc: "netmod@ietf.org" <netmod@ietf.org>
References: <0100016bdded624b-ed3b9adc-d830-4e63-a0e9-efc2aa75e807-000000@email.amazonses.com>
From: David Ball <daviball@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <202ad3d3-980d-482c-45af-e0e42ab77790@cisco.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2019 09:50:42 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.7.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <0100016bdded624b-ed3b9adc-d830-4e63-a0e9-efc2aa75e807-000000@email.amazonses.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------C1DFB8B0A31581DD7F549B38"
Content-Language: en-US
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 10.63.23.113, dhcp-ensft1-uk-vla370-10-63-23-113.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: aer-core-2.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/Yzd7jvN_oxdXx-FutwjJB2QQz8M>
Subject: Re: [netmod] IPR poll on WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-intf-ext-yang-07
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2019 08:50:48 -0000
No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft. David On 10/07/2019 23:07, Kent Watsen wrote: > To each author and contributor listed on the "To" line. > > In order to complete the Adoption poll, are you aware of any IPR that > applies > to WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-intf-ext-yang-07? Please Reply-All > to *this* > email and state either: > > "No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft" > or > "Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft" > > If "yes", has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules > (see RFCs 3669, 5378 and 8179 for more details)? > > If "yes" again, please state either: > > "Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules" > or > "No, the IPR has not been disclosed" > > If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think > appropriate. > > If you are listed as a document author or contributor please answer > the above by > responding to this email regardless of whether or not you are aware of > any relevant > IPR. This document will not advance to the next stage until a > response has been > received from each author and listed contributor. NOTE: THIS APPLIES > TO ALL > OF YOU LISTED IN THIS MESSAGE'S TO LINES. > > If you are on the WG email list or attend WG meetings but are not > listed as an author > or contributor, we remind you of your obligations under the IETF IPR > rules which > encourages you to notify the IETF if you are aware of IPR of others on > an IETF > contribution, or to refrain from participating in any contribution or > discussion related > to your undisclosed IPR. For more information, please see the RFCs > listed above > and http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/wiki/IntellectualProperty. > > Thank you, > NETMOD chairs -- David Ball <daviball@cisco.com>
- [netmod] IPR poll on WG Last Call: draft-ietf-net… Kent Watsen
- Re: [netmod] IPR poll on WG Last Call: draft-ietf… Rob Wilton (rwilton)
- Re: [netmod] IPR poll on WG Last Call: draft-ietf… Selvakumar Sivaraj
- Re: [netmod] IPR poll on WG Last Call: draft-ietf… David Ball