IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [netmod] comments on revised-datastores-00

Ladislav Lhotka <lhotka@nic.cz> Thu, 17 November 2016 08:22 UTC

Return-Path: <lhotka@nic.cz>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C2A912960C for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Nov 2016 00:22:50 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8.497
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.497 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.497] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nic.cz
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Beokiepa6qTX for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Nov 2016 00:22:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.nic.cz (mail.nic.cz [IPv6:2001:1488:800:400::400]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 63C3C12948C for <netmod@ietf.org>; Thu, 17 Nov 2016 00:17:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from t2001067c03700128b9d77173bb9a6909.v6.meeting.ietf.org (unknown [IPv6:2001:67c:370:128:b9d7:7173:bb9a:6909]) by mail.nic.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A784960869; Thu, 17 Nov 2016 09:17:30 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=nic.cz; s=default; t=1479370651; bh=q4uSU1frw4Un/PjvKWV9/ClIGCufs8t7GOQjl6MPy8U=; h=From:Date:To; b=LFiBGlEj8cc1liiKQSTDfRUqqLPA1L7/spdPnqoNRPkHiwHUs7LHHSksJWhWvhuTn VrptQlCMD+DgGjDZ2NaHGNFIZ7apOWYIKNvK2dhJB67Ai7Yqc9ysIqqYT8BGgoF2I8 2+NG5POR6lFVGuuRKtnUEGx/cISYhpyApOU2PKBU=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.1 \(3251\))
From: Ladislav Lhotka <lhotka@nic.cz>
In-Reply-To: <201611170803.uAH83uTD061633@idle.juniper.net>
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2016 17:17:25 +0900
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <5BCAD155-77AB-4ADB-AE1B-25AD98CA8944@nic.cz>
References: <201611170803.uAH83uTD061633@idle.juniper.net>
To: Phil Shafer <phil@juniper.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3251)
X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.98.7 at mail
X-Virus-Status: Clean
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/Z2g6H4km9TJZdBjSuYAqlrRwTvU>
Cc: "netmod@ietf.org" <netmod@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [netmod] comments on revised-datastores-00
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2016 08:22:50 -0000

> On 17 Nov 2016, at 17:03, Phil Shafer <phil@juniper.net> wrote:
> 
> Ladislav Lhotka writes:
>> So let's say we have a list with min-elements = 1 (such as the list of RIBs), and there 
>> is already one entry provided by the system. what has to be done in order to make <inten
>> ded> valid? Should the system-controlled entry permeate up to <intended>?
> 
> We should update the draft to make it clear to allow system-controlled
> data to appear as part of the template/expansion activity so that
> such data can be referred to from the running config.  For example,
> a static route could have a next-hop of a system-defined lo0.  Not
> that this is a good idea, but...

I agree, this is often needed for system-controlled instances (default RIB is another use case), and so far the only option was to put a dummy entry into the configuration manually.

Lada 

> 
> Thanks,
> Phil

--
Ladislav Lhotka, CZ.NIC Labs
PGP Key ID: E74E8C0C

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email