Re: [netmod] draft-ietf-netmod-yang-tree-diagrams - IPR verfication request

Igor Bryskin <Igor.Bryskin@huawei.com> Fri, 22 December 2017 15:07 UTC

Return-Path: <Igor.Bryskin@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0087512EAEF; Fri, 22 Dec 2017 07:07:51 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.23
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.23 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6PRjpNaO1H89; Fri, 22 Dec 2017 07:07:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 70AA012EAEA; Fri, 22 Dec 2017 07:07:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lhreml705-cah.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.7.107]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 28E7CE04265E3; Fri, 22 Dec 2017 15:07:39 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from SJCEML701-CHM.china.huawei.com (10.208.112.40) by lhreml705-cah.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.46) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.361.1; Fri, 22 Dec 2017 15:07:40 +0000
Received: from SJCEML521-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.1.83]) by SJCEML701-CHM.china.huawei.com ([169.254.3.207]) with mapi id 14.03.0361.001; Fri, 22 Dec 2017 07:07:31 -0800
From: Igor Bryskin <Igor.Bryskin@huawei.com>
To: "mbj@tail-f.com" <mbj@tail-f.com>, Igor Bryskin <Igor.Bryskin@huawei.com>
CC: "lberger@labn.net" <lberger@labn.net>, "joelja@bogus.com" <joelja@bogus.com>, "draft-ietf-netmod-yang-tree-diagrams@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-netmod-yang-tree-diagrams@ietf.org>, "netmod@ietf.org" <netmod@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [netmod] draft-ietf-netmod-yang-tree-diagrams - IPR verfication request
Thread-Index: AQHTePjMSYSuQYfNYUGK68E5pr/EAKNO05qAgACbYluAAIjxgP//g02T
Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2017 15:07:30 +0000
Message-ID: <etPan.5a3d1fd3.3fedf81e.fa1@localhost>
References: <780f5479-6f7b-21b8-e9c7-741ae0063c3f@bogus.com> <255ae0d8-6ba4-9bb1-49e3-c23dc42171bc@labn.net> <etPan.5a3d1590.2bde0b8e.fa1@localhost>, <20171222.153349.958796853977057436.mbj@tail-f.com>
In-Reply-To: <20171222.153349.958796853977057436.mbj@tail-f.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_etPan5a3d1fd33fedf81efa1localhost_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/ZD1lJwFMSAUAPk66aY4aSYSltLo>
Subject: Re: [netmod] draft-ietf-netmod-yang-tree-diagrams - IPR verfication request
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2017 15:07:51 -0000

Great, this works,

Igor
From:Martin Bjorklund
To:Igor Bryskin,
Cc:lberger@labn.net,joelja@bogus.com,draft-ietf-netmod-yang-tree-diagrams@ietf.org,netmod@ietf.org,
Date:2017-12-22 09:34:04
Subject:Re: [netmod] draft-ietf-netmod-yang-tree-diagrams - IPR verfication request

Igor Bryskin <Igor.Bryskin@huawei.com> wrote:
> Hi,
> I have a question for the authors.
> Today a yang-tree-diagram represents extended YANG groupings , which
> often makes a tree hard to read/ understand. Do you think there could
> be a way to represent groupings as collapsed?

In draft -03, we added the option of printing the "uses statement",
e.g.:

    |        +---x active-route
    |        |  +--ro output
    |        |     +--ro route
    |        |        +--ro next-hop
    |        |        |  +---u next-hop-state-content
    |        |        +---u route-metadata


instead of:


    |        +---x active-route
    |        |  +--ro output
    |        |     +--ro route
    |        |        +--ro next-hop
    |        |        |  +--ro (next-hop-options)
    |        |        |     +--:(simple-next-hop)
    |        |        |     |  +--ro outgoing-interface?   if:interface-ref
    |        |        |     +--:(special-next-hop)
    |        |        |     |  +--ro special-next-hop?     enumeration
    |        |        |     +--:(next-hop-list)
    |        |        |        +--ro next-hop-list
    |        |        |           +--ro next-hop*
    |        |        |              +--ro outgoing-interface?   if:interface-ref
    |        |        +--ro source-protocol    identityref
    |        |        +--ro active?            empty
    |        |        +--ro last-updated?      yang:date-and-time



/martin

>
> Thanks,
> Igor
> From:Lou Berger
> To:joel
> jaeggli,draft-ietf-netmod-yang-tree-diagrams@ietf.org,netmod@ietf.org,
> Date:2017-12-21 16:07:58
> Subject:Re: [netmod] draft-ietf-netmod-yang-tree-diagrams - IPR
> verfication request
>
> No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft
>
> Lou
> (co-author)
>
> On 12/19/2017 1:39 PM, joel jaeggli wrote:
> > Authors, Contributors, WG,
> >
> > As part of the preparation for WG Last Call:
> >
> > Are you aware of any IPR that applies to drafts identified above?
> >
> > Please state either:
> >
> > "No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft"
> > or
> > "Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft"
> >
> > If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules
> > (see RFCs 3669, 5378 and 8179 for more details)?
> >
> > If yes to the above, please state either:
> >
> > "Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules"
> > or
> > "No, the IPR has not been disclosed"
> >
> > If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think
> > appropriate.
> >
> > If you are listed as a document author or contributor please answer
> > the
> > above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not you are
> > aware of any relevant IPR. This document will not advance to the next
> > stage until a response has been received from each author and listed
> > contributor. NOTE: THIS APPLIES TO ALL OF YOU LISTED IN THIS MESSAGE'S
> > TO LINES.
> >
> > If you are on the WG email list or attend WG meetings but are not
> > listed
> > as an author or contributor, we remind you of your obligations under
> > the IETF IPR rules which encourages you to notify the IETF if you are
> > aware of IPR of others on an IETF contribution, or to refrain from
> > participating in any contribution or discussion related to your
> > undisclosed IPR. For more information, please see the RFCs listed
> > above
> > and
> > http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/wiki/IntellectualProperty.
> >
> > Thank you,
> > NetMod WG Chairs
> >
> > PS Please include all listed in the headers of this message in your
> > response.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > netmod mailing list
> > netmod@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
>
> _______________________________________________
> netmod mailing list
> netmod@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod