Re: [netmod] Obsolete feature - what does it mean?

Randy Presuhn <randy_presuhn@alumni.stanford.edu> Wed, 27 February 2019 18:42 UTC

Return-Path: <randy_presuhn@alumni.stanford.edu>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE19B1310AF for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Feb 2019 10:42:09 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wYtrfFzgCVQO for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Feb 2019 10:42:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pf1-f178.google.com (mail-pf1-f178.google.com [209.85.210.178]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 676BD1310AB for <netmod@ietf.org>; Wed, 27 Feb 2019 10:42:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pf1-f178.google.com with SMTP id n22so8425560pfa.3 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Wed, 27 Feb 2019 10:42:08 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=nT2kracH2fA39J66t/2ee6ygVaT7UG4HMea+UQgRCiQ=; b=evs6Ix3RoxHyWrbsd8WlIgqepdp5zemY+rC9JH492QpHoHJDDFhRRqegr/Y1TMBKHO OOXaNVefNxX8LBhFfgj0TcFf5jxYylk+M/YV6ixzwCxogMaqoIUxMF7DDHMLd4p5YVWF /7qnbrSMUzPYrkQpKrniCiRLH6M0a0reYMt2Lbio29VG1d5so/RzLDV3X+NGKye8Maa7 5CPMrsHB2r37+YC9xevAigxISUkxtXmSSe9AnAuOEhJNSmoQoFogKdPAS6/4bX9q1jis KMiBl5SqyCQI+IjlfJ9FqMuPrJ9tfNrZCBHIXhOPD1EvakAUuxa6DqXfqB02JC60ukQ1 Hh7w==
X-Gm-Message-State: AHQUAuYjC0/ZJoLtCxXRIrGWGjW5IaHgepRsrEnqjfU7hHPN9mButMye C4EYh3Pc4ESNP7IZzmyq7h2GR8xYgyE=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AHgI3IbuGLvDvcJB58cqnDTXPJ/leMTMUeD7mfjADN3HAbKB7oxz5mYBYiR6eINgsqZ1j1cgZ/WCtA==
X-Received: by 2002:a62:4793:: with SMTP id p19mr3202730pfi.76.1551292927408; Wed, 27 Feb 2019 10:42:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.100] (c-69-181-241-121.hsd1.ca.comcast.net. [69.181.241.121]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id f2sm20332552pgn.43.2019.02.27.10.42.04 for <netmod@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 27 Feb 2019 10:42:06 -0800 (PST)
To: netmod@ietf.org
References: <d0f6a34d-9218-b09b-5e9c-1747b1b780dc@ericsson.com> <20190227103303.emm3xj372rb7fx7t@anna.jacobs.jacobs-university.de> <2035f82c-bc0c-e5bb-40f2-efa6dcef6bde@ericsson.com> <010001692fb7a0c6-9a9ecc8c-f0b0-413c-92eb-30ea0d4b1834-000000@email.amazonses.com> <20190227164816.tlfqg4voabtdk7ey@anna.jacobs.jacobs-university.de> <01000169302cb03d-acbf34b5-56ba-40f0-8abc-2e938f5b0dfa-000000@email.amazonses.com>
From: Randy Presuhn <randy_presuhn@alumni.stanford.edu>
Message-ID: <678ff95c-ecd0-5902-133a-60136af492e3@alumni.stanford.edu>
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2019 10:42:05 -0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <01000169302cb03d-acbf34b5-56ba-40f0-8abc-2e938f5b0dfa-000000@email.amazonses.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/ZMyAXPaZrZWcD6q_FKaI49fHTxM>
Subject: Re: [netmod] Obsolete feature - what does it mean?
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2019 18:42:10 -0000

Hi -

On 2/27/2019 10:17 AM, Kent Watsen wrote:
...
> If so, then there should be a way for the server to indicate which 
> discretionary choices it made.   I'd suggest that "obsolete" defaults to 
> "not-implemented" and thus only servers that want to continue support 
> for the node need to indicate anything.  A deviation would be a good fit 
> for this.

Are you saying that legacy boxes sitting in dark closets
would somehow be updated to provide this indication?

Randy