IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [netmod] yang-next meeting at IETF 104?

"Reshad Rahman (rrahman)" <rrahman@cisco.com> Tue, 15 January 2019 20:28 UTC

Return-Path: <rrahman@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 195BB1295D8 for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Jan 2019 12:28:50 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.643
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.643 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.142, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UtuIo0OYNAxF for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Jan 2019 12:28:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from alln-iport-7.cisco.com (alln-iport-7.cisco.com [173.37.142.94]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 87C101294D0 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Jan 2019 12:28:47 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1996; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1547584127; x=1548793727; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=HCJO0OVkioj4E5LWUqO15zLpzEnofg+yCjWDwZ1uIJY=; b=NvbKBpnIrsPxRZZEkyHQMRYrUirQcB4KMWfgwc6g6J+dKkzPrx8108TB MYHnxY8hrtsokFF2cPiULkVQu8oiUj8d8vzJpkmYe4cHCJ2w+q+HsWlCy EeLDunUnEmbp8SxpkTh+Czvh7CCqdlS5goqRhgmCdSWLjYUnVjsMyG8Kq s=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0ADAACWQT5c/5JdJa1jGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQcBAQEBAQGBUQQBAQEBAQsBggNmgQInCoN3iBqLcoFoJZd8gXsLAQEYDQeDekYCF4IrIjQJDQEDAQECAQECbRwMhUsBAQMBAQEhEToLEAIBCA4MAiYCAgIlCxUQAgQBDQWDIgGBeQgPrGOBL4VChGgFgQuLNBeBQD+BOAwTgkyBQYFdAQECGIFHF4JyMYImAqIFCQKHHoptGJIAiXiFEYtAAhEUgScfOIFWcBU7KgGCQYIzg1aFFIU/coEoiGYBgR4BAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.56,483,1539648000"; d="scan'208";a="225877018"
Received: from rcdn-core-10.cisco.com ([173.37.93.146]) by alln-iport-7.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 15 Jan 2019 20:28:46 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-002.cisco.com (xch-rcd-002.cisco.com [173.37.102.12]) by rcdn-core-10.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id x0FKSkO8001977 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 15 Jan 2019 20:28:46 GMT
Received: from xch-rcd-005.cisco.com (173.37.102.15) by XCH-RCD-002.cisco.com (173.37.102.12) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1395.4; Tue, 15 Jan 2019 14:28:45 -0600
Received: from xch-rcd-005.cisco.com ([173.37.102.15]) by XCH-RCD-005.cisco.com ([173.37.102.15]) with mapi id 15.00.1395.000; Tue, 15 Jan 2019 14:28:45 -0600
From: "Reshad Rahman (rrahman)" <rrahman@cisco.com>
To: Kent Watsen <kwatsen@juniper.net>, Martin Bjorklund <mbj@tail-f.com>
CC: "netmod@ietf.org" <netmod@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [netmod] yang-next meeting at IETF 104?
Thread-Index: AQHUrCuvYp1ErZRJck2GnO0IAz2VAKWvZFgAgAACgoCAACizgIAABJiAgAAorwCAAR1ogA==
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2019 20:28:45 +0000
Message-ID: <19833711-114D-458E-A36D-15105C1DDB17@cisco.com>
References: <20190114.181030.1714833278513265488.mbj@tail-f.com> <9292f38a-1f09-d738-6d4c-0645d78f86d5@cisco.com> <F3997729-2E38-4EC7-BFE2-21E7CD55F990@juniper.net> <20190114.210135.1957093582321067772.mbj@tail-f.com> <B0A12CCE-C6D6-4757-B6F2-339075B4747A@juniper.net>
In-Reply-To: <B0A12CCE-C6D6-4757-B6F2-339075B4747A@juniper.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/10.10.5.181209
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [161.44.212.39]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <6BE9A820A094D64BA90A29B3379CAA07@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.37.102.12, xch-rcd-002.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: rcdn-core-10.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/Zh7jbkw31b7gQyT5-qGb5Qdw240>
Subject: Re: [netmod] yang-next meeting at IETF 104?
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2019 20:28:50 -0000

I am interested in attending the virtual meeting(s) and the in-person meeting in Prague (Monday-Thursday preferably).

On 2019-01-14, 5:27 PM, "netmod on behalf of Kent Watsen" <netmod-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of kwatsen@juniper.net> wrote:

    >> PS: I've been too busy to setup a virtual meeting for us to finish the
    >> review of the YANG-next items in the GitHub tracker.  But things are
    >> just beginning to free up a little for me now.  Would folks like to
    >> have a meeting before 104 to finish that review?
    >
    > I think that's what the side meeting would do - review the current
    > items to see what makes sense.
    
    Sure, but perhaps the in-person time would be better spent analyzing the results of the reviews?  Recall that we're trying to score each item on three axis: importance, complexity, backward-compatibility.
    
    Current results here:  https://github.com/netmod-wg/yang-next/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+sort%3Acreated-asc.
    
    At the rate we were going (about 40% done), I imagine it taking 2-4 hours to score the remaining issues.  This may not be an issue if we can meet multiple times during the week but, if time is tight, I'd rather have this part done before we meet.
    
    Kent // contributor
    
    
    _______________________________________________
    netmod mailing list
    netmod@ietf.org
    https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email