Re: [netmod] Adoption poll for draft-wu-netmod-factory-default-02

tom petch <ietfc@btconnect.com> Wed, 08 May 2019 11:31 UTC

Return-Path: <ietfc@btconnect.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6211E1200EC for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 May 2019 04:31:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.248
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.248 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RATWARE_MS_HASH=2.148, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=btconnect.onmicrosoft.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rjEbVYG3kSHs for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 May 2019 04:31:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from EUR01-DB5-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-eopbgr150122.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.107.15.122]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 193831200EA for <netmod@ietf.org>; Wed, 8 May 2019 04:31:39 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=btconnect.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-btconnect-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=DuS5UZL/wMfEPGqurfMU7XZ3DZUVyOU4r/3Hzu3lpMI=; b=AzHR5LQfNdS1bSHtofvCb6fFFDdT1/hg+eiTwapGzvtgXI80IDGcyip+6spXENiyGsxiwCYwf1+/2mBbbV3PlgeYgqeniZv523p/sfc/0Gd85X4f5I8diWfm8NxIwiBefhEMeUdRX1HVMUnJ3gs8B9WotW1hNC6dnzvYoSRkoUo=
Received: from VI1PR07MB3118.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (10.175.242.156) by VI1PR07MB6159.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (20.178.124.160) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.1878.13; Wed, 8 May 2019 11:31:36 +0000
Received: from VI1PR07MB3118.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::41a4:68a9:d620:d42b]) by VI1PR07MB3118.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::41a4:68a9:d620:d42b%3]) with mapi id 15.20.1878.019; Wed, 8 May 2019 11:31:36 +0000
From: tom petch <ietfc@btconnect.com>
To: "Joe Clarke (jclarke)" <jclarke@cisco.com>, Qin Wu <bill.wu@huawei.com>
CC: "netmod@ietf.org" <netmod@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [netmod] Adoption poll for draft-wu-netmod-factory-default-02
Thread-Index: AQHVBZGYZ1YLmj+D6UqmZXjpVYKlQw==
Date: Wed, 8 May 2019 11:31:35 +0000
Message-ID: <065d01d50591$173d7c80$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net>
References: <B8F9A780D330094D99AF023C5877DABAA4909DE4@nkgeml513-mbx.china.huawei.com> <EB363D33-307A-48E7-B886-08395356BA86@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-clientproxiedby: LO2P265CA0316.GBRP265.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM (2603:10a6:600:a4::16) To VI1PR07MB3118.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (2603:10a6:802:20::28)
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=ietfc@btconnect.com;
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106
x-originating-ip: [86.139.215.234]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 66ee25c8-f8a4-45ab-0542-08d6d3a8ba89
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(2390118)(7020095)(4652040)(8989299)(4534185)(4627221)(201703031133081)(201702281549075)(8990200)(5600141)(711020)(4605104)(2017052603328)(7193020); SRVR:VI1PR07MB6159;
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: VI1PR07MB6159:
x-ms-exchange-purlcount: 3
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <VI1PR07MB6159E57CE933CE40EE4882B3A0320@VI1PR07MB6159.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:10000;
x-forefront-prvs: 0031A0FFAF
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(396003)(39860400002)(346002)(136003)(366004)(376002)(189003)(199004)(13464003)(44736005)(81816011)(81686011)(76176011)(6486002)(68736007)(478600001)(229853002)(61296003)(71200400001)(52116002)(99286004)(71190400001)(305945005)(6116002)(14454004)(5660300002)(86152003)(3846002)(316002)(966005)(7736002)(6436002)(110136005)(25786009)(2906002)(6306002)(6512007)(9686003)(8676002)(53936002)(256004)(50226002)(8936002)(4720700003)(14444005)(386003)(86362001)(6506007)(1556002)(102836004)(84392002)(4326008)(446003)(81156014)(81166006)(53546011)(26005)(64756008)(14496001)(66476007)(62236002)(66556008)(6246003)(186003)(66446008)(66946007)(486006)(476003)(44716002)(73956011)(66066001)(74416001)(7726001); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:VI1PR07MB6159; H:VI1PR07MB3118.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:0;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: btconnect.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: DyydZ/8/ODNtB5t+5lsEk7jf4oCvwePJ1Lvj++K/rw0TdIHUfEtEu8C3dEmeJCpQ72/3kCGoEW664hA+RVxaCu02w2D1CTASESFhsBPSYD0DeknfWhjWEwsrt61Sr3lwUp+oavrU0+cGyNCT/inArgkysdIhbgGtaEfY3utjXfsfccG/Zg6YkS1ybjdn0kt8SWOjWPZ6/cAhNzh51kiTOUZj/C+ZtRqd9Ig/2QakuIWhl5ZiGvl1So2hQz1He1zjdr+uWNLocrm5cEczp//SzThkgxhQ44dTq0TgJg5KNOCygZZg9AoSgAWOZA61QQTdl9aFjf0XM2s8LmodsLvmt1XRiJO/qRJ0fuTFhojs4cUSIRhrWlLjd4Oo7HTBEyGQiAdrgio9pXW9GebLg9bqTTsblC1xqKv3PDaIqGvUYmE=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <6670F02153896848A0293FCAFE257B61@eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: btconnect.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 66ee25c8-f8a4-45ab-0542-08d6d3a8ba89
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 08 May 2019 11:31:35.9720 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: cf8853ed-96e5-465b-9185-806bfe185e30
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: VI1PR07MB6159
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/ZvpA2bkw6bFaX-uTnSH_-orAnv0>
Subject: Re: [netmod] Adoption poll for draft-wu-netmod-factory-default-02
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 May 2019 11:31:42 -0000

----- Original Message -----
From: "Joe Clarke (jclarke)" <jclarke@cisco.com>;
Sent: Monday, May 06, 2019 4:11 PM
>
> On May 6, 2019, at 08:06, Qin Wu
<bill.wu@huawei.com<mailto:bill.wu@huawei.com>> wrote:
>
> Hi, Chairs:
> Sorry for late follow up, thanks Jurgen, Andy,Joe, Joel and all others
for good comments, here is the update based on discussion and suggestion
on the mailing list
> The diff is:
> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-wu-netmod-factory-default-03
>
> Hey, Qin.  I read through the changes, and I have a couple of
additional comments.
>
> First, the term “YANG server” sounds odd to me.  I know what you mean,
but I haven’t seen this defined before.  Maybe just saying a device or
host is sufficient?

Joe

If you look at the various RFC - YANG, Netconf, NMDA - they all define
the terms 'client' and 'server'; in the context, 'YANG server' seems
appropriate.

Tom Petch





>
> When you talk about the datastore to be reset, you list <running>,
<startup>, and <candidate>.  You state that each will receive the
contents of <factory-default>.  The <candidate> DS wouldn’t need that.
I think it would just be zeroed out.
>
> I think the RPC should reset any and all non-derived read-write
datastores and not imply that a specific DS’s contents (i.e., the
factory-default DS) is copied to them.  This way, other DSes would just
be handled by this RPC based on implementation.  The <factory-default>
can exist as the factory default contents for <startup>.
>
> Joe
>
> We believe it is ready for second adoption poll. Thanks!
>
> -Qin (on behalf of authors)
> 发件人: netmod [mailto:netmod-bounces@ietf.org] 代表 Kent Watsen
> 发送时间: 2019年4月9日 2:36
> 收件人: netmod@ietf.org<mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
> 主题: Re: [netmod] Adoption poll for draft-wu-netmod-factory-default-02
>
> This message concludes the adoption poll for
draft-wu-netmod-factory-default-02   The working group consensus
supports working on the problem, but fundamental concerns were raised
regarding the solution, specifically around reseting datastores versus
resetting devices.  The chairs feel that these issues should be
addressed before proceeding with the adoption.
>
> Authors, please update and resubmit the draft addressing the comments
received during the adoption poll.  Another adoption poll will be issued
when ready.
> Thank you,
> Kent (and Lou and Joel)
>
>
>
> On Mar 25, 2019, at 4:34 PM, Kent Watsen
<kent+ietf@watsen.net<mailto:kent+ietf@watsen.net>> wrote:
>
> This email begins a 2-week adoption poll for:
>
>
>     https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-wu-netmod-factory-default-02
>
>
> Please voice your support or objections before April
8.<x-apple-data-detectors://1>
>
>
> Kent (and Lou)
> _______________________________________________
> netmod mailing list
> netmod@ietf.org<mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
>
> _______________________________________________
> netmod mailing list
> netmod@ietf.org<mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
>
>


------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------


> _______________________________________________
> netmod mailing list
> netmod@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
>