Re: [netmod] rfc6991bis: inet:host

tom petch <ietfc@btconnect.com> Mon, 20 July 2020 08:53 UTC

Return-Path: <ietfc@btconnect.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9E0C3A08C3 for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 Jul 2020 01:53:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=btconnect.onmicrosoft.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Glr69a7FTdMh for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 Jul 2020 01:53:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from EUR03-VE1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-eopbgr50134.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.107.5.134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4DCFA3A08AF for <netmod@ietf.org>; Mon, 20 Jul 2020 01:53:48 -0700 (PDT)
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=bMYckYtzNXdmuNR0O/dJp89hCzMu1vDas3k9ntyydwjjOlMwSlZvkPVe7/XOjs1kROs2X354WzcD6Tlz+YIdW9vDXeZ2xsMOnm5pxQKXhTraoannAhRroRi+oYOTqhS9jfhF9EQ0L3SEldbBx0Z2mUXsLE2VIUWsp9KBhOxl1JS0O1Oardwqe9TC3fGZFnMu1YR1UrFzQAT9NGJnz25C4A06fCdvGMLpATLhVdj6TufJzUbVGDjGsuek/CaUAWL0EJaUz0zouXAdYn5L0xFEdXjdoOa85o2Sn8cGsG3L9FwFBG/W+YK2br+xlyWG3qcPIgNYA5+wC8qCcS/DYXKORQ==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=MdAaGLOVirYnWygJJ4p0+BucGHT8PeQP5KI8rzZxE/k=; b=eQ3p70NySmx3l3GQRSoFQ6Sf/1jB/mCXXbpZ/CebbR0juE2Uq+G2OJHUvGmuwc0uQc6onZENBskNj8yGxYD9/Y3WLIzkhovxCXc0zkX5LBYodyUCXcnMn3EsnZmE1AFbx4wAACoJrtWTaDY6E9OmvQHV8Ex8GULwA7NCQW10HCtXU0/8agdmPER/GK2fQBbb8FFURaEM9dXpRCieGNkAKv7yKaSCVlM9LQhAh+fxAgEVNQt9X91ivGmIVvFkfZjS9qJvzBTUTwgOD+68rDp2W8jU6K0ZdtcQIkb2OSo6CPfrOOK4OhTRHiWf86f2ebq0FSwVtel/icduJD7uoAggXQ==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=btconnect.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=btconnect.com; dkim=pass header.d=btconnect.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=btconnect.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-btconnect-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=MdAaGLOVirYnWygJJ4p0+BucGHT8PeQP5KI8rzZxE/k=; b=dudDi5pBLStuPQQXrNPaLS+uEMnBCYFUM/xfFohf1HjT6SZxpgRIWTOEO8M+aKLVkemXS0nyPk1tll4TU/sKtnX866Y3gEXVWGuWTRNnCx1M+u+Kaf4YIMOnTNHstPpIxACgs+Y1j+xN4LY3Tm2P5+lfW3Xp68aXl129mjrh5Hs=
Received: from AM6PR07MB5222.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (2603:10a6:20b:61::25) by AM6PR07MB5892.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (2603:10a6:20b:5a::22) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3216.14; Mon, 20 Jul 2020 08:53:45 +0000
Received: from AM6PR07MB5222.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::6d04:3a51:ec0d:9890]) by AM6PR07MB5222.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::6d04:3a51:ec0d:9890%7]) with mapi id 15.20.3216.017; Mon, 20 Jul 2020 08:53:45 +0000
From: tom petch <ietfc@btconnect.com>
To: "netmod@ietf.org" <netmod@ietf.org>, Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de>
Thread-Topic: [netmod] rfc6991bis: inet:host
Thread-Index: AQHWXG7p/kt7/axcH0O2VulpsrsrPKkQLMjj
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2020 08:53:45 +0000
Message-ID: <AM6PR07MB5222101A401FCF3AEC213FEEA07B0@AM6PR07MB5222.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
References: <20200717191717.u5a3wv4nbajjdcaj@anna.jacobs.jacobs-university.de>
In-Reply-To: <20200717191717.u5a3wv4nbajjdcaj@anna.jacobs.jacobs-university.de>
Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US
Content-Language: en-GB
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: ietf.org; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;ietf.org; dmarc=none action=none header.from=btconnect.com;
x-originating-ip: [81.131.229.35]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 1b4d0c88-2a03-4b89-ec47-08d82c8a695a
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: AM6PR07MB5892:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <AM6PR07MB5892495CBA87D0558F9A4DC6A07B0@AM6PR07MB5892.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:7219;
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: dkno379liPgYRxc3XIqMQzf3bIn6tfavzrj0Ltmq0AF+Lmv51QWiEhKdq4xyrbtvuCPJOQySOJO+8Dt5rTKtvGmPMtlzFkXLd+yft1vqTWpNSeZ4NjrYMJe88yZIeqM2lNDkXfVCzS5GqwQF1/8yWBvOcucItM7OdTqD2K8cqR7ING43UkP6lW6CydHrObVqpkUriwcM141fm38wCko4WJj4q3G7VkYCmBwF/WkEsd0+dEOcxL/DdCUQHCmrIgBPcj+Bzq1Z8OQ7v8ytr/cmGSnk4gFoVAmpPS1vtUCEBrWTf1xibwP8fSJJs2s//Nd/UUe36Cp3AyEvJxNwxeUNgqAWk3l6lrWrL16eqDQR+y8AgIOigCsJIGIosloR1m2A8ye0yWA/+nHezAqMITaQQg==
x-forefront-antispam-report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:AM6PR07MB5222.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com; PTR:; CAT:NONE; SFTY:; SFS:(396003)(39860400002)(346002)(366004)(376002)(136003)(2906002)(52536014)(7696005)(8676002)(316002)(9686003)(5660300002)(478600001)(55016002)(33656002)(110136005)(64756008)(91956017)(71200400001)(966005)(66556008)(86362001)(26005)(76116006)(8936002)(83080400001)(186003)(6506007)(66476007)(66946007)(66446008); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102;
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: xorBeGS6NywRzd3ibo8om19gWwtZN20XIT8uxnTpQe8DNP8Z3W522XQVdbUpZuV2/G276J4sPQXg1n/EUuA/LfMrkHZ19bTCXStE7Ngi91Q7ARc6Rs+A44YrXCvG/LDVIlj9csbE6oQURJX4hrhy3H0SFIzipS+zeeUlxi4WML/XVOV+w6sr+LBGIbc5tG310/NUXJj8VU6oA7u2Wx0UBeFog3jQEiFHmRF0582YNfqsnkvUsoJFAPxGNR/CQWU+awL5jAWB1XcS+LxQV4PX/ZULHfbMsp70aotstO9Sgt5KuwLMm8YHSb1hqH1D0HnhT+xD6XCaqQv1iLeqgcw2dXHc4LoTdvd3zMGo5EvMMqYvl4/Iep1dNKwrkhZzPnXIy4qJdfhVYdr38qEf/6zUzeMAqRRu1xrsQjZLapBwBTWZJD1H8bWy7sq3ETr1x3Bq5/yvBdd7WOkeLNbhVDMeW5DTyROY9vAtgVxlYJY0T2M=
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: btconnect.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Internal
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: AM6PR07MB5222.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 1b4d0c88-2a03-4b89-ec47-08d82c8a695a
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 20 Jul 2020 08:53:45.6511 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: cf8853ed-96e5-465b-9185-806bfe185e30
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: V3zqm99RQ5uoP1FXpnSvFxd7/Rqd6x2l0UmT+/QUTxvkSjVkTz6gG0bEF+pifm+BMzi4isGGLDfPoG0QgxR5iQ==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: AM6PR07MB5892
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/EJo04TD6Lsi3j_gTnrFhyxdnoe8>
Subject: Re: [netmod] rfc6991bis: inet:host
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2020 08:53:51 -0000

From: netmod <netmod-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de>
Sent: 17 July 2020 20:17

  - Lada suggested to replace the inet:domain-name usage in
    the union with a new host-name definition that follows
    the NR-LDH definition in RFC 5890.

  - Unclear which problem is fixed and how this works from a
    backwards compatibility perspective.

  - See the thread '6991bis: host' in your private list archive
    (I can't find it in the IETF archive)

  - I can't tell for sure that Lada's proposal is (i) correct and (ii)
    not breaking anything

<tp>
host and domain are two separate concepts with different semantics and different syntax, something that those not familiar with the RFC often confuse (but which most text books get right) so I have no problem with having host and domain but am not a fan of changing the existing definition.

Tom Petch

  - Proposal: ?

--
Juergen Schoenwaelder           Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH
Phone: +49 421 200 3587         Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany
Fax:   +49 421 200 3103         <https://www.jacobs-university.de/>

_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
netmod@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod