Re: [netmod] Stephen Farrell's No Objection on draft-ietf-netmod-routing-cfg-24: (with COMMENT)
Ladislav Lhotka <lhotka@nic.cz> Wed, 02 November 2016 14:04 UTC
Return-Path: <lhotka@nic.cz>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CEF0129661; Wed, 2 Nov 2016 07:04:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8.497
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.497 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.497] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nic.cz
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id me5p6HgiKZjs; Wed, 2 Nov 2016 07:04:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.nic.cz (mail.nic.cz [217.31.204.67]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0639A129625; Wed, 2 Nov 2016 07:04:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [IPv6:2001:718:1a02:1:1d1d:32b6:9da:571d] (unknown [IPv6:2001:718:1a02:1:1d1d:32b6:9da:571d]) by mail.nic.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B1E5D60B38; Wed, 2 Nov 2016 15:04:41 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=nic.cz; s=default; t=1478095481; bh=qyVWB5pp4TjoOWyjFFhVxGuhmHYQyGXE6chijNRH0/g=; h=From:Date:To; b=MuWgzyjVMkAtFRukjRZNtMsQHSvi9OkY0WDxV3STinMqazd1W6F8Iwrd413uN8jaM 3xNSZyn87LxTTMIQJR+znz6+9ylEomvXPMIjqLokBMBQLZU1u9PuqRkd1iWBxS16e+ ITnzK3Mn4wbnQzHA9WOkEW4pCB9DXHSs1KE6Rdbk=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.1 \(3251\))
From: Ladislav Lhotka <lhotka@nic.cz>
In-Reply-To: <147808398811.24141.15196130392409336719.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2016 15:04:42 +0100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <A7A00C9E-D76E-4BE3-8022-D2269E3D1F5B@nic.cz>
References: <147808398811.24141.15196130392409336719.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
To: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3251)
X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.98.7 at mail
X-Virus-Status: Clean
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/_GHCBl89GUxpbk3zADCs1BHY2QY>
Cc: netmod-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-netmod-routing-cfg@ietf.org, netmod@ietf.org, draft-ietf-netmod-routing-cfg.all@ietf.org, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [netmod] Stephen Farrell's No Objection on draft-ietf-netmod-routing-cfg-24: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2016 14:04:51 -0000
> On 2 Nov 2016, at 11:53, Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> wrote: > > Stephen Farrell has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-netmod-routing-cfg-24: No Objection > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all > email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this > introductory paragraph, however.) > > > Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html > for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. > > > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-netmod-routing-cfg/ > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > COMMENT: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > If there exists a draft for a yang module that augments this > in a way that includes cryptographic values (e.g. maybe for an > IPsec VPN or something) then I think that'd be a nice addition > to section 11 as an informative reference. One such module is ietf-key-chain by Acee et al. [1] Would it make sense to include an informative reference to it? Lada [1] https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-key-chain-10 > > -- Ladislav Lhotka, CZ.NIC Labs PGP Key ID: E74E8C0C
- [netmod] Stephen Farrell's No Objection on draft-… Stephen Farrell
- Re: [netmod] Stephen Farrell's No Objection on dr… Ladislav Lhotka
- Re: [netmod] Stephen Farrell's No Objection on dr… Stephen Farrell
- Re: [netmod] Stephen Farrell's No Objection on dr… Acee Lindem (acee)