Re: [netmod] rfc6991bis: yang:percentage

Ladislav Lhotka <ladislav.lhotka@nic.cz> Mon, 20 July 2020 09:19 UTC

Return-Path: <ladislav.lhotka@nic.cz>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E6903A0039 for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 Jul 2020 02:19:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ojNANI1ckQ5M for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 Jul 2020 02:19:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from trail.lhotka.name (trail.lhotka.name [77.48.224.143]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D33F63A00B0 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Mon, 20 Jul 2020 02:19:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by trail.lhotka.name (Postfix, from userid 109) id 46BA28600C7; Mon, 20 Jul 2020 11:11:43 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from localhost (nat-1.nic.cz [217.31.205.1]) by trail.lhotka.name (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2468C86005D; Mon, 20 Jul 2020 11:11:41 +0200 (CEST)
From: Ladislav Lhotka <ladislav.lhotka@nic.cz>
To: Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de>, netmod@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <20200717191638.6wl3dqktcrnghuyl@anna.jacobs.jacobs-university.de>
References: <20200717191638.6wl3dqktcrnghuyl@anna.jacobs.jacobs-university.de>
Mail-Followup-To: Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de>, netmod@ietf.org
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2020 11:19:45 +0200
Message-ID: <87d04qzgpa.fsf@nic.cz>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/_rnAg-JwTlUtnf70BCWauWtWABY>
Subject: Re: [netmod] rfc6991bis: yang:percentage
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2020 09:19:52 -0000

Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de> writes:

>   - Percentages are frequently used in YANG models but usages differ a
>     lot in precision and range. It is not clear what the proper
>     generic definition of a percentage type would be and whether it is
>     worth having it.
>
>     RFC 7950 example:
>
>          typedef percent { type uint8 { range "0 .. 100"; } }
>
>     RFC 8294:
>
>          typedef percentage { type uint8 { range "0..100"; } }
>
>     I-Ds:
>          typedef percentage { type decimal64 { fraction-digits 5; } }
>          typedef percentile { type decimal64 { fraction-digits 2; } }
>
>     The yang catalogue seems to be down. :-(
>
>   - Proposal: do not add a percentage type since it is trivial to
>     define a context specific percentage type that matches range and
>     precision requirements (and there is already a definition in RFC
>     8294 for those who need exactly that definition).

I agree with this proposal. It is also possible to use

   units percent;

where necessary.

Lada

>
> -- 
> Juergen Schoenwaelder           Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH
> Phone: +49 421 200 3587         Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany
> Fax:   +49 421 200 3103         <https://www.jacobs-university.de/>
>
> _______________________________________________
> netmod mailing list
> netmod@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod

-- 
Ladislav Lhotka 
Head, CZ.NIC Labs
PGP Key ID: 0xB8F92B08A9F76C67