Re: [netmod] Justification for decimal64 over string for floating point values in geo location data?
Christian Hopps <chopps@chopps.org> Tue, 07 July 2020 12:27 UTC
Return-Path: <chopps@chopps.org>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB8AB3A0C1C
for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Jul 2020 05:27:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001,
URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id 5z-Dvpqcminc for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Tue, 7 Jul 2020 05:27:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.chopps.org (smtp.chopps.org [54.88.81.56])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C4733A0C16
for <netmod@ietf.org>; Tue, 7 Jul 2020 05:27:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from stubbs.int.chopps.org (047-050-069-038.biz.spectrum.com
[47.50.69.38])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
(Client did not present a certificate)
by smtp.chopps.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AF8A660EC0;
Tue, 7 Jul 2020 12:27:20 +0000 (UTC)
From: Christian Hopps <chopps@chopps.org>
Message-Id: <107B2D49-93A8-41EE-B109-3B0485BC56AC@chopps.org>
Content-Type: multipart/signed;
boundary="Apple-Mail=_22973534-6C3B-41D6-AD79-CE6300E2DB12";
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.80.23.2.2\))
Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2020 08:27:19 -0400
In-Reply-To: <20200707121821.ry6irvxx6uzvf6pu@anna.jacobs.jacobs-university.de>
Cc: Christian Hopps <chopps@chopps.org>,
NetMod WG <netmod@ietf.org>
To: Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de>
References: <B548C4B4-2A97-4736-A6B2-358D1491D125@chopps.org>
<20200707112450.wrttuprwrdr3nl5i@anna.jacobs.jacobs-university.de>
<C77ED032-788C-410C-A239-86286ADE4E4A@chopps.org>
<20200707121821.ry6irvxx6uzvf6pu@anna.jacobs.jacobs-university.de>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.80.23.2.2)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/ae2N1VtSjWb_mt1btnbls4D6X6w>
Subject: Re: [netmod] Justification for decimal64 over string for floating
point values in geo location data?
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>,
<mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>,
<mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Jul 2020 12:27:23 -0000
> On Jul 7, 2020, at 8:18 AM, Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de> wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 07, 2020 at 07:53:19AM -0400, Christian Hopps wrote: >> >> So do you think it's enough to just use decimal64, and not justify it's use over strings? > > I do not know what 'strings' are here. Mentioned in the earlier mail instead of "decimal64" use "type string { pattern '[0-9]+(\.[0-9]+)?'; }" > In the xml and json encodings, everything finally has a string > representation. But what matters is how the strings are interpreted > since computers internally often do not use strings when it comes to > numbers or addresses or ... But they can operate with arbitrarily precise numbers (e.g., python mpmath, or even decimal with some arbitrarily large precision specified). Thanks, Chris. > > /js > > -- > Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH > Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany > Fax: +49 421 200 3103 <https://www.jacobs-university.de/> >
- [netmod] Justification for decimal64 over string … Christian Hopps
- Re: [netmod] Justification for decimal64 over str… Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [netmod] Justification for decimal64 over str… Ladislav Lhotka
- Re: [netmod] Justification for decimal64 over str… Christian Hopps
- Re: [netmod] Justification for decimal64 over str… Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [netmod] Justification for decimal64 over str… Christian Hopps
- Re: [netmod] Justification for decimal64 over str… Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [netmod] Justification for decimal64 over str… Christian Hopps
- Re: [netmod] Justification for decimal64 over str… Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [netmod] Justification for decimal64 over str… Ladislav Lhotka
- Re: [netmod] Justification for decimal64 over str… Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [netmod] Justification for decimal64 over str… David Spakes
- Re: [netmod] Justification for decimal64 over str… Ladislav Lhotka
- Re: [netmod] Justification for decimal64 over str… Rob Wilton (rwilton)
- Re: [netmod] Justification for decimal64 over str… Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [netmod] Justification for decimal64 over str… Rob Wilton (rwilton)
- Re: [netmod] Justification for decimal64 over str… Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [netmod] Justification for decimal64 over str… Carsten Bormann
- Re: [netmod] Justification for decimal64 over str… Rob Wilton (rwilton)
- Re: [netmod] Justification for decimal64 over str… Don Fedyk