Re: [netmod] TSV-ART review of draft-ietf-netmod-acl-model-19

Sonal,

I’m very familiar with the flags and fields of TCP. My question is what are
the use cases for and ACL to match on URG, PSH, or the sequence numbers?

Allison (for the Transport Area review team)

On Tuesday, 10 July 2018, Sonal Agarwal <sagarwal12@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Allison,
>
> Please see inline:
>
> Thanks,
> Sonal.
>
> On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 12:43 PM, Allison Mankin <allison.mankin@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> I've reviewed this document as part of the transport area review team's
>> ongoing effort to review key IETF documents. These comments were written
>> primarily for the transport area directors, but are copied to the
>> document's authors for their information and to allow them to address any
>> issues raised. When done at the time of IETF Last Call, the authors should
>> consider this review together with any other last-call comments they
>> receive. Please always CC tsv-art@… if you reply to or forward this
>> review..
>>
>> Summary:
>> Almost Ready (but I do have a question)
>>
>> Technicals:
>> I reviewed that the details about TCP, UDP, ECN, and DSCP are consistent
>> with the specifications, and that the specifications are accurate.  The
>> model is accurate for these.
>>
>>
>> Question:
>>  What is the use case for ACLs referencing TCP PSH and URG flags, and
>> sequence numbers?  These are not very predictable and I would think not
>> very useful for the work that ACLs do, but I'm willing to be informed.
>>
>> [SA] The use case for this would be for applications that use ACL's and
>> require high levels of security. Enumerating all the supported flags and
>> their bit positions makes it clear to the user. These flags and the
>> sequence number are all part of the TCP header. https://en.wikipedia.
>> org/wiki/Transmission_Control_Protocol
>>
>
>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> netmod mailing list
>> netmod@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
>>
>>
>