Re: [netmod] review of draft-ietf-netmod-yang-tree-diagrams-02
Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de> Mon, 30 October 2017 15:07 UTC
Return-Path: <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A173313FA5F for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Oct 2017 08:07:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HRFxhBJYDkzL for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Oct 2017 08:07:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from atlas5.jacobs-university.de (atlas5.jacobs-university.de [212.201.44.20]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8302F13FA68 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Mon, 30 Oct 2017 08:07:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (demetrius5.irc-it.jacobs-university.de [10.70.0.222]) by atlas5.jacobs-university.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC2D83B; Mon, 30 Oct 2017 16:07:24 +0100 (CET)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at jacobs-university.de
Received: from atlas5.jacobs-university.de ([10.70.0.217]) by localhost (demetrius5.jacobs-university.de [10.70.0.222]) (amavisd-new, port 10032) with ESMTP id 0JZRZwjHbZNl; Mon, 30 Oct 2017 16:07:22 +0100 (CET)
Received: from hermes.jacobs-university.de (hermes.jacobs-university.de [212.201.44.23]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "hermes.jacobs-university.de", Issuer "Jacobs University CA - G01" (verified OK)) by atlas5.jacobs-university.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Mon, 30 Oct 2017 16:07:24 +0100 (CET)
Received: from localhost (demetrius1.jacobs-university.de [212.201.44.46]) by hermes.jacobs-university.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94ADC2010F; Mon, 30 Oct 2017 16:07:24 +0100 (CET)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at jacobs-university.de
Received: from hermes.jacobs-university.de ([212.201.44.23]) by localhost (demetrius1.jacobs-university.de [212.201.44.32]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SQ3VlkE4d72m; Mon, 30 Oct 2017 16:07:24 +0100 (CET)
Received: from elstar.local (elstar.jacobs.jacobs-university.de [10.50.231.133]) by hermes.jacobs-university.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0368C2010E; Mon, 30 Oct 2017 16:07:24 +0100 (CET)
Received: by elstar.local (Postfix, from userid 501) id 08FA14143AC3; Mon, 30 Oct 2017 16:05:56 +0100 (CET)
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2017 16:05:56 +0100
From: Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de>
To: Martin Bjorklund <mbj@tail-f.com>
Cc: netmod@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20171030150556.frebbljyv26buiub@elstar.local>
Reply-To: Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de>
Mail-Followup-To: Martin Bjorklund <mbj@tail-f.com>, netmod@ietf.org
References: <20171029185057.hecz7vgul343tjki@elstar.local> <20171030.153656.1325329737662426135.mbj@tail-f.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20171030.153656.1325329737662426135.mbj@tail-f.com>
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170714 (1.8.3)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/b2ysOJ8KsB9zPN7apv9YUYjvxWo>
Subject: Re: [netmod] review of draft-ietf-netmod-yang-tree-diagrams-02
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2017 15:07:50 -0000
On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 03:36:56PM +0100, Martin Bjorklund wrote: > > - Are the empty lines mandatory or can empty lines added as one sees > > fit? In particular, is there an empty line after the module: line? > > Is there an empty line before each section of different top-level > > symbols? Does the order of top-level symbols matter? Do we really > > want to specify these details? Well, for indentation, things are > > pretty specific so I wonder what the general strategy is here. > > For indentation, spaces a specified b/c they matter (ok, we *could* > specify some more flexible indentation rules). Blank line do not > matter. Do you think we should say something about this? I would hope that nobody ever comes up with the idea of writing programs to parse tree diagrams, hence I am fine with a rather liberal definition (and I also do not care about the exact number of spaces but I if it helps to describe the indentation rules then OK). > > - I think Section 4.1 is not about representing _instance_ data > > trees. It is describing how a schema mounted schema looks like - and > > I think this is OK. I think this document should not specify > > instance tree formats. So change the title of section 4.1 or simply > > delete the subsection title entirely. > > I agree. How about "Representation of Mounted Data Trees"? Isn't is a mounted schema tree? > > - If a schema mount point is used for a readonly mount, then I > > understand that only the toplevel changes to ro. Is this useful or > > potentially misleading? Was the alternative considered to change all > > nodes recursively to ro? I assume they are all effectively ro in > > this case. > > Hmm, I'll check w/ my co-author. I think it should be changed > recursively. > > - If the WG wants to include tree diagram usage guidelines in this > > document, then I think we should (if we still manage) take tree > > diagram related text out of 6087bis before it is cast into > > stone. Changes to 6087bis would be: > > > > - Change the subsubstitle "2.5.1. YANG Tree Diagrams" to "2.6. > > YANG Tree Diagrams" (since the definition is in an external > > document, I think this should not be nested in 2.5 anymore). > > > > - Remove section 3.4. > > > > - Remove this from section 8 (which is not quite correct anymore > > anyway since the definition moved to a separate document). > > > > o Added YANG tree diagram definition and guideline > > > > Since two are bug fixes anyway (I think), I think it makes sense to > > get 6087bis fixed so that the tree diagram usage text is in one > > place. > > I have no strong opinion, but I think I prefer to have the guidelines > for tree diagrams in the tree diagram draft. Maybe 6087 can point to > this document. RFC 6087bis would still point to the tree diagram if you apply the edits above but it would no do anything more than that. /js -- Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany Fax: +49 421 200 3103 <http://www.jacobs-university.de/>
- [netmod] review of draft-ietf-netmod-yang-tree-di… Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [netmod] review of draft-ietf-netmod-yang-tre… Martin Bjorklund
- Re: [netmod] review of draft-ietf-netmod-yang-tre… Lou Berger
- Re: [netmod] review of draft-ietf-netmod-yang-tre… Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [netmod] review of draft-ietf-netmod-yang-tre… Martin Bjorklund