Re: [netmod] draft netmod charter update proposal

Kent Watsen <kwatsen@juniper.net> Mon, 27 February 2017 20:31 UTC

Return-Path: <kwatsen@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F8F112A324; Mon, 27 Feb 2017 12:31:12 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.922
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.922 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=junipernetworks.onmicrosoft.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RpamzaMaLaco; Mon, 27 Feb 2017 12:31:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from NAM01-BY2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-by2nam01on0102.outbound.protection.outlook.com [104.47.34.102]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4348C12A321; Mon, 27 Feb 2017 12:31:11 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=junipernetworks.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-juniper-net; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=gTHvw4UucD+kO0wpNj/FB+08IEMLvOb3d4Uaq+yXE3A=; b=U8Ncxk6NCYX5w95KLF1QCAXsXknLEAFhFHt0Bo/V1OquZnhtUD/MrLiLPTziZXoM7yIBRkTW1CP3WHdwh7pbSBMP4XG31zrvZyUjjVfXGQs3OY5+tAGj3O/iPDFEmLyj+pvwNpW5+UO9bY6SJdhgGn3IUtmldjWinS5U5vAJ71I=
Received: from CY1PR0501MB1450.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.160.149.11) by CY1PR0501MB1452.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.160.149.13) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P384) id 15.1.947.2; Mon, 27 Feb 2017 20:31:04 +0000
Received: from CY1PR0501MB1450.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([10.160.149.11]) by CY1PR0501MB1450.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([10.160.149.11]) with mapi id 15.01.0947.007; Mon, 27 Feb 2017 20:31:04 +0000
From: Kent Watsen <kwatsen@juniper.net>
To: Robert Wilton <rwilton@cisco.com>, "netmod@ietf.org" <netmod@ietf.org>, "netmod-chairs@ietf.org" <netmod-chairs@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [netmod] draft netmod charter update proposal
Thread-Index: AQHSjWtMgvd1I9y/IUSjVG5c54oSBqF9KfeA///YNIA=
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2017 20:31:04 +0000
Message-ID: <9A9AD440-953D-46D4-9207-97619D054912@juniper.net>
References: <B6359563-0649-453A-B29F-28375F2BD3A4@juniper.net> <0830e87c-ee4f-bf53-2c51-96c166d3955e@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <0830e87c-ee4f-bf53-2c51-96c166d3955e@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/f.1f.0.170216
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=kwatsen@juniper.net;
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-originating-ip: [66.129.241.10]
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 9c6d6579-1a9c-4435-1be1-08d45f4f8d24
x-ms-office365-filtering-ht: Tenant
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(22001)(48565401081); SRVR:CY1PR0501MB1452;
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; CY1PR0501MB1452; 7:myaoPlwEQqdsPi2tumIo14IjKeYEMB7RtH+JKEXgHPuI+PAXw+Zgs45dodEDGBWDGlGJMxeO/1syBbDtoOzZUqCgJ+wXPrXjX1RPBewYF73MozI/lCBGBf5PolrsqVF35Qx8wvUkjrwda2i3T929hDOIKhiMAI3ayGV3M5hNr4fBU3mTGhR9YYv126KGMOsFa2OyIsn6tlCFmJpLcoTwLY78tStzhWS5+czk+nvV/KU6tx1bPIDEt8wro/TV5kPQUUMW72INCw+94E2AAkq2/X2lD3ASKWXDKTALHp68ojIpBhXg4f0n24Hk18uHr1mlTl9uGAyz0gAMnJQYWfoIgA==
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <CY1PR0501MB1452F22AB7595FB5DF02A71DA5570@CY1PR0501MB1452.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:(35073007944872);
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(6040375)(601004)(2401047)(8121501046)(5005006)(3002001)(10201501046)(6055026)(6041248)(20161123558025)(20161123560025)(20161123555025)(20161123564025)(20161123562025)(6072148); SRVR:CY1PR0501MB1452; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:CY1PR0501MB1452;
x-forefront-prvs: 02318D10FB
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(6009001)(7916002)(39840400002)(39450400003)(39410400002)(39850400002)(39860400002)(189002)(51444003)(51694002)(199003)(2906002)(105586002)(229853002)(81166006)(81156014)(3660700001)(66066001)(3280700002)(106116001)(97736004)(189998001)(4001350100001)(8676002)(106356001)(25786008)(33656002)(99286003)(305945005)(77096006)(6486002)(8936002)(2501003)(92566002)(50986999)(101416001)(6436002)(6506006)(54356999)(76176999)(6246003)(86362001)(2201001)(83716003)(53936002)(2950100002)(83506001)(82746002)(38730400002)(2900100001)(7736002)(6512007)(36756003)(3846002)(6116002)(5660300001)(68736007)(122556002)(102836003)(104396002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:CY1PR0501MB1452; H:CY1PR0501MB1450.namprd05.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1; LANG:en;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: juniper.net does not designate permitted sender hosts)
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <34A622C75F1ADA48927A29CA851A2E46@namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: juniper.net
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 27 Feb 2017 20:31:04.0154 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: bea78b3c-4cdb-4130-854a-1d193232e5f4
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: CY1PR0501MB1452
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/b90qKGYnp7hmYkTWVgzprRhU43M>
Subject: Re: [netmod] draft netmod charter update proposal
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2017 20:31:12 -0000

Hi Rob,


> Hi Kent, Lou,
>
> I think that it might possibly be a good idea to please align the 
> timelines for:
>
>   draft-ietf-netmod-intf-ext-yang
>   draft-ietf-netmod-sub-intf-vlan-yang
>
> because I think that it will be somewhat helpful to review both 
> documents together.

Can you provide dates you think we can commit to?


> Also, I just wanted to confirm that the datastore work is covered by 
> this text:
>
>    c) Maintaining a conceptual framework in which YANG models are used.
>       This effort entails describing the context that network management
>       protocols (e.g., NETCONF, RESTCONF, CoAP, etc.) operate in, and
>       how certain YANG statements interact in that context.

Yes indeed, or at least, that was the intention.  Here "conceptual framework"
and "context" are meant to be more all-encompassing than just the datastores
effort.  Makes sense, or needs clarification?


Thanks,
Kent // co-chair