Re: [netmod] adoption poll for yang-versioning-reqs-02

"Reshad Rahman (rrahman)" <rrahman@cisco.com> Sun, 24 March 2019 21:47 UTC

Return-Path: <rrahman@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C161A120134 for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 24 Mar 2019 14:47:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.501
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.501 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com header.b=mkNhb7fa; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com header.b=Vqm2FS6U
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nd-A9443Cjrx for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 24 Mar 2019 14:47:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com [173.37.86.77]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DF2A3120074 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Sun, 24 Mar 2019 14:47:01 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=9151; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1553464021; x=1554673621; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=2TaDSbvbEBuNTpC4brEom1W2CJUfDMxKfqLQsMT6McQ=; b=mkNhb7fa7Vxa1jz5x3jdup0MEMmsq6KJBeD09/hWR9wZxO81eU6OCMgk +hz2TEgzcbqISqQUwZM3DNL/5xV1yZjQHosxjxhBK0VhWKzXTDaly9vOE LiIeQCSIpf5nskQNtzWNyfEiA0I+geCF0vbpQRorGlZ7+uhXP0L5rSxsH 8=;
IronPort-PHdr: =?us-ascii?q?9a23=3A3U64hhEFRVuTPPyDxcA4H51GYnJ96bzpIg4Y7I?= =?us-ascii?q?YmgLtSc6Oluo7vJ1Hb+e4z1A3SRYuO7fVChqKWqK3mVWEaqbe5+HEZON0pNV?= =?us-ascii?q?cejNkO2QkpAcqLE0r+eeTwZiw/FcJqX15+9Hb9Ok9QS47z?=
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0ADAABW+pdc/5RdJa1jGQEBAQEBAQE?= =?us-ascii?q?BAQEBAQcBAQEBAQGBUQQBAQEBAQsBgQ4vUANodAQLJwqEBINHA4RSilaCV5J?= =?us-ascii?q?DhEmBLoEkA1QNAQEshEACF4RlIjQJDQEBAwEBCQEDAm0cDIVKAQEBAwEjHQE?= =?us-ascii?q?BNwEECwIBCBEDAQIBJwMCAgIwFAkIAgQBDQUbgwcBgRFMAw0IAQKiNgKKFHG?= =?us-ascii?q?BL4J4AQEFgkeCNRiCDAiBLwGLMReBQD+BOB+CTD6CYQSBfxaCVDGCJoprggi?= =?us-ascii?q?EH4dGjEEJApM3GZN+ixyTKgIEAgQFAg4BAQWBTTiBVnAVZQGCQYIKg26KU3K?= =?us-ascii?q?BKI1GAYEeAQE?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.60,256,1549929600"; d="scan'208,217";a="539275141"
Received: from rcdn-core-12.cisco.com ([173.37.93.148]) by rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 24 Mar 2019 21:47:00 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-012.cisco.com (xch-rcd-012.cisco.com [173.37.102.22]) by rcdn-core-12.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id x2OLl0VC005469 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Sun, 24 Mar 2019 21:47:00 GMT
Received: from xhs-aln-002.cisco.com (173.37.135.119) by XCH-RCD-012.cisco.com (173.37.102.22) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Sun, 24 Mar 2019 16:46:59 -0500
Received: from xhs-rtp-003.cisco.com (64.101.210.230) by xhs-aln-002.cisco.com (173.37.135.119) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Sun, 24 Mar 2019 16:46:58 -0500
Received: from NAM05-BY2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (64.101.32.56) by xhs-rtp-003.cisco.com (64.101.210.230) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3 via Frontend Transport; Sun, 24 Mar 2019 17:46:58 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-cisco-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=2TaDSbvbEBuNTpC4brEom1W2CJUfDMxKfqLQsMT6McQ=; b=Vqm2FS6UIvnQSRr1nWkAZNG4X/dzHIWZUBCwPLemqnGi9OFbcOx5eOs2b1zBxiln9AfV1MXTBGTAQS5XIIzuREAzV9Fv1bUy66iEpHVoTt/UFqC460uNsO2kwQsGXjRgSxzZQWmjweJRokGHSywFOkqOczSQw6yEYQZiERdJpzg=
Received: from MN2PR11MB3695.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (20.178.252.156) by MN2PR11MB3886.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (20.179.150.15) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.1730.15; Sun, 24 Mar 2019 21:46:57 +0000
Received: from MN2PR11MB3695.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::4d5b:81c5:6ab2:c5d]) by MN2PR11MB3695.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::4d5b:81c5:6ab2:c5d%5]) with mapi id 15.20.1730.017; Sun, 24 Mar 2019 21:46:57 +0000
From: "Reshad Rahman (rrahman)" <rrahman@cisco.com>
To: Andy Bierman <andy@yumaworks.com>, Kent Watsen <kent+ietf@watsen.net>
CC: NetMod WG <netmod@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [netmod] adoption poll for yang-versioning-reqs-02
Thread-Index: AQHU4n0Hp4WW914A9EC/TspsQ5jhtKYbP/OAgAAD2gCAAB4oAA==
Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2019 21:46:56 +0000
Message-ID: <516900C0-88C2-4D91-991A-F7E9F8B824D6@cisco.com>
References: <0100016978b80dcd-31f317a5-443b-400a-98b3-2bfc91841bdc-000000@email.amazonses.com> <491b2abc-90ee-90d0-6672-ffff796e14d9@labn.net> <E4480DFE-2051-4C7F-A092-5B31AA15DA80@bogus.com> <CABCOCHSdakF3vACfwPMi4sq60+ndDxTrOyeqTjRpTYSQrUdzoA@mail.gmail.com> <01000169b1732722-f41ea67f-9c6e-4ec4-a6f2-90e340b4d7a4-000000@email.amazonses.com> <CABCOCHTcr-UYZew-3yX+xx7NOzk6V2S1YUwm7K7AhvO2_fcD5Q@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABCOCHTcr-UYZew-3yX+xx7NOzk6V2S1YUwm7K7AhvO2_fcD5Q@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/10.10.6.190114
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=rrahman@cisco.com;
x-originating-ip: [173.38.117.92]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 91eb7a7c-97da-4595-f06c-08d6b0a23cd8
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(2390118)(7020095)(4652040)(8989299)(5600127)(711020)(4605104)(4534185)(4627221)(201703031133081)(201702281549075)(8990200)(2017052603328)(7153060)(7193020); SRVR:MN2PR11MB3886;
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: MN2PR11MB3886:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <MN2PR11MB388623B01EB5685D446E85A0AB5D0@MN2PR11MB3886.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
x-forefront-prvs: 09860C2161
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(39860400002)(346002)(376002)(396003)(136003)(366004)(199004)(189003)(256004)(8936002)(316002)(6486002)(54896002)(6306002)(2906002)(6436002)(26005)(236005)(6512007)(99286004)(25786009)(68736007)(53936002)(5660300002)(7736002)(83716004)(102836004)(8676002)(6246003)(71190400001)(81156014)(36756003)(186003)(81166006)(478600001)(110136005)(6116002)(58126008)(66066001)(6506007)(3846002)(476003)(97736004)(4326008)(53546011)(71200400001)(2616005)(86362001)(486006)(33656002)(14454004)(106356001)(105586002)(446003)(11346002)(229853002)(93886005)(82746002)(76176011); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:MN2PR11MB3886; H:MN2PR11MB3695.namprd11.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: cisco.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: H9N60v4dhMwzT2NxEjX0IzxtMXtVCb8VX1CwdIrNyEHT754ZmASoB0Nq+biIlEv45gAEBbxuM10c53WECq+uU2nc1zYnogKeGc35KzaS3w+9iTcoIgQLiGsvPfZTdyjfPp+PKGme83rXkNza8B1KLnzMH+f6edWbW2+CPDouHOQOEutuBn+KEvbcI7S7Cu7mpq+ebDzTkmFddCajom+tem8TSxC7bLWDfTGA3VrEWFJTXUfRmpLK8SBOnE6Ijtozj/C0b3W3/NgHIQui8vE5ixiJUZ9rC1bDt+uodpU0bDf7VNV9ugmUh/ByXK/wAojepM2ScnsXL07dWlP8VqoOq5G15/zvl7aSxAqZyxh+9da9djP5JQGO1yniJTvBPWJB7JPdxzylYP/0FrBdrojUg908QTU6sCkE+e4yM1KTHjs=
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_516900C088C24D91991AF7E9F8B824D6ciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 91eb7a7c-97da-4595-f06c-08d6b0a23cd8
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 24 Mar 2019 21:46:56.9573 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5ae1af62-9505-4097-a69a-c1553ef7840e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: MN2PR11MB3886
X-OriginatorOrg: cisco.com
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.37.102.22, xch-rcd-012.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: rcdn-core-12.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/bIqr6q6zOkjMlNHWvadBuQgZPUU>
Subject: Re: [netmod] adoption poll for yang-versioning-reqs-02
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2019 21:47:05 -0000

From: netmod <netmod-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of 'Andy Bierman' <andy@yumaworks.com>
Date: Sunday, March 24, 2019 at 9:59 PM
To: Kent Watsen <kent+ietf@watsen.net>
Cc: NetMod WG <netmod@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [netmod] adoption poll for yang-versioning-reqs-02



On Sun, Mar 24, 2019 at 1:45 PM Kent Watsen <kent+ietf@watsen.net<mailto:kent%2Bietf@watsen.net>> wrote:

Hi Andy,

> Andy Bierman wrote:
>
> BTW, I do not support adoption of the requirements document at all.

Can you say why?   Is it a blanket statement about adopting requirements drafts in general, or something specific to this draft.

Because they just waste time.
They are mostly reverse engineered from the desired solution (by the authors).

<RR> I don’t think we’re tied to the solution of semver or modified semver (speaking for myself at least). The main question on the requirements is whether NBC changes should be accepted. Many people seem to think so, if you don’t agree that’s fine, but I disagree with the claim that the requirements are reverse engineered from the solution, I believe the design team has strived to separate the 2.

Reshad.

We end up having the same debates twice.

It is usually worse then that, since you end up debating the wording in the requirements
instead of the merits of the solution-in-progress (considering all factors and readjusted requirements).


Kent

Andy