Re: [netmod] schema mount open issue #1

Martin Bjorklund <mbj@tail-f.com> Wed, 30 August 2017 07:41 UTC

Return-Path: <mbj@tail-f.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88AB41326FE for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Aug 2017 00:41:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QmtvZK_HFoW1 for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Aug 2017 00:41:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.tail-f.com (mail.tail-f.com [46.21.102.45]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E954C132386 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Aug 2017 00:41:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (unknown [173.38.220.57]) by mail.tail-f.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A0E9A1AE012C; Wed, 30 Aug 2017 09:41:55 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2017 09:40:28 +0200
Message-Id: <20170830.094028.1809893324608957744.mbj@tail-f.com>
To: lhotka@nic.cz
Cc: lberger@labn.net, netmod@ietf.org
From: Martin Bjorklund <mbj@tail-f.com>
In-Reply-To: <87shgacvrb.fsf@nic.cz>
References: <1503929779.1715.65.camel@nic.cz> <81b138c6-9941-3313-979c-61edad7819a7@labn.net> <87shgacvrb.fsf@nic.cz>
X-Mailer: Mew version 6.7 on Emacs 24.5 / Mule 6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-15"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/bMKzUzZ-HME8UhAWhd-84kilQbg>
Subject: Re: [netmod] schema mount open issue #1
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2017 07:41:59 -0000

Ladislav Lhotka <lhotka@nic.cz> wrote:
> Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net> writes:
> 
> > Lada,
> >
> >
> > On 8/28/2017 10:16 AM, Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
> >> Lou Berger píše v Po 28. 08. 2017 v 09:40 -0400:

[...]

> >>> PS is your view aligned with martin or our example?
> >> If you mean shifting the XPath context node to the mount point instance, then
> >> yes.

So, going back to the original issue; does anyone have any objection
to changing the XPath context for parent-reference as describied in my
original post?


/martin