Re: [netmod] [core] 🔔 admin WG Last Call of CORECONF drafts: draft-ietf-core-sid-11

Ivaylo Petrov <ivaylo@ackl.io> Wed, 15 April 2020 13:26 UTC

Return-Path: <ivaylo@ackl.io>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0F503A0776 for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Apr 2020 06:26:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=ackl-io.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SjuPrL57U1zt for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Apr 2020 06:26:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wr1-x42c.google.com (mail-wr1-x42c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::42c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1074F3A0772 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Apr 2020 06:26:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wr1-x42c.google.com with SMTP id u13so18672672wrp.3 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Apr 2020 06:26:37 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ackl-io.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=5pfOh5WRVG5cE2Hgza4tjMuROUF7B3sQvt8bZYwTC7Y=; b=a/lwtAny65C99IHt+tFRczaXg+SBGcek2EG/THqCU3FBOw2uWlZiitwpTzSkQpRggm Nx402BXtnKUDIMdAtYMRUTy3KG/oEHR+DDBvDbTcaB0gcxsFeIjpk5Ne7l1aVqizXNC0 Pbi/UEm5zggihWMvkvbocGs3ev7QfrkSj3MOAV04lU6d5iEajullfEVz9j54q0l/3BT+ w73c9YGvCIdJLH9QojQwMlXVMBcfOD/MLlU/pbqNjjAnKBUqLX5Uk+hVorjmWrhbGcri dwZH7imP8gXW5Q3lFawzYLcC8Q+Kcefpkj9Vt2SF3EipAzRFUtkuG2qbdzKpmlMUX7ug OL1w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=5pfOh5WRVG5cE2Hgza4tjMuROUF7B3sQvt8bZYwTC7Y=; b=pF3no6pLeEUrnLHjUxC+vDoL0vai1xkLc86PoJltyggcfdP7tklytYEi0Ldkn0y2nn UDYMR5sHszkir81RTV9a3eSJAESJBTAFNWUOkyRMiNK/29rCGw3GZqW+lg96AFJzekU7 lVmUWoYyvOW6LtmmoJWrF3vitcZ5g7Agm4YqXh7zP7PFEtHr09Ulcyc0nSlZ9DMi4raS Mf0KgnVdyN3fQmcOxmBMNrMFHTHzVxohBzV4KI7gxrm97WDHAk+iUfEvsIa3Wxb0FMIW 7Ahv77lVTrSwiVk5xO17RL65v1HbO+F2thBalVm1cZxlrykPpY7FrLylYI5m8p9yXwiF r82A==
X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PuawhAJJ3MgSaizzkbcsYZULKJbqavcdDap+19jjiRJuJmyIB8f6 fUwLEyw/byaqsdsqe8f6BgpXy3ax9XCSWzbOIW//xg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypLHC6ba6gLgM0fihkAa9uUTg+LkvVkqvgbcgoZTqzWx54cQQaTiYu+xGIEgMKEyG0LExvw/ObWE0PKvYodebLE=
X-Received: by 2002:adf:e681:: with SMTP id r1mr7640265wrm.213.1586957196264; Wed, 15 Apr 2020 06:26:36 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <9AD3C4BB-7965-4776-84C4-6B5BFDCAA262@tzi.org> <e3a61d2c-1183-5ece-74d8-b1bad26ddfe6@ericsson.com> <15C8F1D1-B560-4D52-8D77-377C6B1C0518@tzi.org> <DB7PR07MB5657B7037CC9018B113DB17DA0CB0@DB7PR07MB5657.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <DB7PR07MB5657B7037CC9018B113DB17DA0CB0@DB7PR07MB5657.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
From: Ivaylo Petrov <ivaylo@ackl.io>
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2020 15:26:10 +0200
Message-ID: <CAJFkdRyLJU4ucSrQ4FTGD5BdqDOiE+REVGfndPrB5Gk+e+7DAA@mail.gmail.com>
To: tom petch <ietfc@btconnect.com>
Cc: core <core@ietf.org>, "netmod@ietf.org" <netmod@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000f520e605a354433e"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/bT9sbOaB9fw1TgUdg49X0yZHfI0>
Subject: Re: [netmod] =?utf-8?b?W2NvcmVdICDwn5SUIGFkbWluIFdHIExhc3QgQ2FsbCBv?= =?utf-8?q?f_CORECONF_drafts=3A_draft-ietf-core-sid-11?=
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2020 13:26:41 -0000

Hello Tom,

Thank you for your review and your comments! They truly help us improve
this document. Please find my answers below (prefixed with [IP]). Note that
the diff after handing your comments and those of Esko Dijk and Juergen
Schoenwaelder can be found at [1].

Best regards,
Ivaylo

[1]:
https://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url1=draft-ietf-core-sid&url2=http://core-wg.github.io/yang-cbor/draft-ietf-core-sid-latest.txt

On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 1:16 PM tom petch <ietfc@btconnect.com> wrote:

> Some YANG admin for core-sid
>
> import must have a reference clause
>

[IP]: Fixed.

such reference must be Normative References for the I-D
>

[IP]: Fixed.

no RFC Editor note to update the date (I know, they will fix that :-)
>

[IP]: Fixed.

contact lacks e-mail of WG
>

[IP]: Fixed.


> IANA Considerations fails to register namespace
>

[IP]: Fixed.

IANA Considerations does not specify a Group name; a well-chosen group name
> makes a registry easy to find.  Many if not most of the existing Group
> names are not well-chosen.  Please choose with care. e.g. is this for
> constrained devices or for all; is it specific to YANG and will there be
> other uses? ....
>

[IP]: That is a very good point. I am not sure how it is supposed to work -
IANA will ask us about the group name when they create the registries or
there is some text that we can write to request this. I will follow with a
question to the working group with a few options for possible group names.

Tom Petch
> ________________________________________
> From: netmod <netmod-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of Carsten Bormann <
> cabo@tzi.org>
> Sent: 09 March 2020 13:04
> To: core
> Cc: netmod@ietf.org
> Subject: [netmod] 🔔 WG Last Call of CORECONF drafts:
> draft-ietf-core-yang-cbor-12, -sid-11, -comi-09, -yang-library-01
>
> It took us a long time to get the four CORECONF drafts in sync,
> but now we are ready for WGLC.
>
> This starts a working group last call for
> — draft-ietf-core-yang-cbor-12
> — draft-ietf-core-sid-11
> — draft-ietf-core-comi-09
> — draft-ietf-core-yang-library-01
>
> ending on
>
>         24:00 UTC on Tuesday, March 31, 2020.
>
> (This includes some extra time for the IETF week and for cross-WG
> coordination.)
>
> This WGLC is copied to the netmod WG mailing list; please do have a look
> at these drafts as they are slated to become a part of the greater
> YANG/NETCONF/RESTCONF family.  We intend the discussion to be on the
> CoRE mailing list, but if you find a fundamental issue with YANG or
> RESTCONF, feel free to discuss that on netmod instead.
>
> Please start a new email thread for each major issue that will need
> discussion and make sure the subject line includes the draft name and
> some sort of name for the issue.  (Minor issues such as typos can also
> be sent to the authors.)
>
> If you read the draft and think it looks fine, please send a one line
> email to the list or to the chairs letting us know that so we can get
> a feel of how broad the review has been.
>
> (To reviewers and authors:)  If you are aware of any patent claims that
> might apply to systems that implement these drafts, please review BCP 78
> and BCP 79 and make any appropriate IPR declaration before the last-call
> ends. If you are not sure whether you need to make a declaration or not,
> please talk to the chairs and we will help.
>
> Grüße, Carsten
>
> _______________________________________________
> netmod mailing list
> netmod@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
> _______________________________________________
> core mailing list
> core@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/core
>