Re: [netmod] Stephen Farrell's No Objection on draft-ietf-netmod-yang-json-09: (with COMMENT)

Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com> Thu, 24 March 2016 15:21 UTC

Return-Path: <lear@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62D0112DDB2 for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 24 Mar 2016 08:21:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.531
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.531 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PIKKvxEtjxLZ for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 24 Mar 2016 08:21:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aer-iport-1.cisco.com (aer-iport-1.cisco.com [173.38.203.51]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3FCD212DE06 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Thu, 24 Mar 2016 08:06:11 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2313; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1458831971; x=1460041571; h=subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=PsSlPhaH5XK6/OZY2vyQjcSqP4zKMYqB/S/s3QIzt0U=; b=InbftiYExikRy2qiV/OAP/aA93+VlXrvcwss0209C8/uVPxPqIOGAFX5 UyLgGcjpafkKLOAZEMGRP96gpCGc5qjadb377CF6VTKdfkqF6wJJlqfsy jTuFNNJEhgAQSdJNAaU3p6Jeo96DZezYMsIhZLmRpgyZvGX/gK4sSGr9s M=;
X-Files: signature.asc : 481
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0CoBAClAfRW/xbLJq1evUiCHYFwhg0CgWkSAQEBAQEBAWQnhEIBAQQjVQEQCxgJFgsCAgkDAgECAUUGDQgBAYgjsBuQVgEBAQEBAQEBAgEBAQEBAQEBEAiKYoc8glYBBJdegx6BZokAgVCHZ4VUjwknBDeCMIE2O4oEAQEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.24,385,1454976000"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="676264272"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-3.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 24 Mar 2016 15:06:09 +0000
Received: from [10.61.201.213] ([10.61.201.213]) by aer-core-3.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u2OF69VI016569; Thu, 24 Mar 2016 15:06:09 GMT
To: Ladislav Lhotka <lhotka@nic.cz>
References: <33092781.1458705432558.JavaMail.wam@elwamui-rubis.atl.sa.earthlink.net> <9530271B-7639-41EB-BFBA-E9772BB3F1F1@juniper.net> <B6E0FF6E-E676-42DE-B692-5E71808E5BDA@nic.cz> <56F3E913.1070102@cisco.com> <ACEA2213-CB56-49D0-9D19-D592C05340F1@nic.cz>
From: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <56F40260.2090004@cisco.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2016 16:06:08 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <ACEA2213-CB56-49D0-9D19-D592C05340F1@nic.cz>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="KeQgailv5U2VrUHBPXnTOG287RmL7pUuL"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/bTvHHhmCIwGgrr5OND3lncXlNk4>
Cc: Randy Presuhn <randy_presuhn@mindspring.com>, "netmod@ietf.org" <netmod@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [netmod] Stephen Farrell's No Objection on draft-ietf-netmod-yang-json-09: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2016 15:21:58 -0000

Hi Lada,

On 3/24/16 3:23 PM, Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
> Hi Eliot,
>
> I agree it would be useful to be able to sign configuration data in an encoding-independent way, but it is not an aim of this document to deal with this problem. Encoding-specific approaches are of course available, this probably needn't be mentioned.

I totally understand, and I'm not even asking that this group take on
coding that stuff in an independent way.  A simple reference in security
considerations along the lines that Kent suggested is fine.

Eliot