Re: [netmod] Adoption poll for draft-wu-netmod-factory-default-02

Thanks Andy, see reply inline.

发件人: netmod [mailto:netmod-bounces@ietf.org] 代表 Andy Bierman
发送时间: 2019年3月26日 6:11
收件人: Kent Watsen <kent+ietf@watsen.net>
抄送: NetMod WG <netmod@ietf.org>
主题: Re: [netmod] Adoption poll for draft-wu-netmod-factory-default-02

On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 1:35 PM Kent Watsen <kent+ietf@watsen.net<mailto:kent%2Bietf@watsen.net>> wrote:
This email begins a 2-week adoption poll for:

    https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-wu-netmod-factory-default-02

Please voice your support or objections before April 8.

I have significant concerns about this draft and work item.
The intentions are good and the scope is well-defined.
The problem is that this is a very proprietary implementation detail.

I have already raised the issue that our server cannot factory reset a single datastore.
It can only do that for the whole server (which will setup the datastores
in an implementation manner and order). So another RPC is needed, and if-features..
[Qin]: We allow to reset multiple target datastore within the server, that means we have capability to
Reset all target datastores in the server. In the YANG module, we do add a note to say:
“
      // Do we need an extra parameter that may order a restart of
      // the YANG-server or the whole system?
”
So thanks Andy, we are aware this issue.
I have seen some comments on this issue: "This is great but our server
does not work that way, so we need X,Y,Z"  (Just like I am doing ;-)
How will the WG keep that from happening 10 or 30 times?

I support this work if the WG can figure out how to keep it simple.
(Meaning I support adoption of the work but not going to wait 2+ years for it)
[Qin]: Thanks, that is also the goal we set for this draft.

Kent (and Lou)

Andy

_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
netmod@ietf.org<mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod