Re: [netmod] IPR poll on draft-ietf-netmod-factory-default

Kent Watsen <kent+ietf@watsen.net> Mon, 02 December 2019 16:23 UTC

Return-Path: <0100016ec76c5489-f2918edf-ec5c-455d-a9d9-8be4e47d666f-000000@amazonses.watsen.net>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D799120802 for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Dec 2019 08:23:19 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.896
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.896 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=amazonses.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ToZ9RT5sEBSo for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Dec 2019 08:23:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from a8-83.smtp-out.amazonses.com (a8-83.smtp-out.amazonses.com [54.240.8.83]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8693212008A for <netmod@ietf.org>; Mon, 2 Dec 2019 08:23:17 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/simple; s=6gbrjpgwjskckoa6a5zn6fwqkn67xbtw; d=amazonses.com; t=1575303796; h=From:Message-Id:Content-Type:Mime-Version:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:Cc:To:References:Feedback-ID; bh=WttW2C7IICW4X8CzIlIJVUZZJzIpTfNuCAbglxATaFA=; b=en6qjkFs1NzMydgjEjsjAmyfO10ehQb9F9lFY7ooIrBBvgjaklHwmUKRTK61X68p 1du82eu20EnxLCKqje5s2mTBSpq1AX8QuNr32NqXmDIzvwqd5rlVTR/ucLbDCvLUrSo 4lgUsKuZYZLqzU8IXrls0aOK0BjLrc6KEa6CF32U=
From: Kent Watsen <kent+ietf@watsen.net>
Message-ID: <0100016ec76c5489-f2918edf-ec5c-455d-a9d9-8be4e47d666f-000000@email.amazonses.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_B344FB4D-AE46-4EFB-8AA9-1742022969A1"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\))
Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2019 16:23:16 +0000
In-Reply-To: <0100016e60d7d37e-1c626a76-627c-4b43-8718-4c68dd90ef0a-000000@email.amazonses.com>
Cc: "netmod@ietf.org" <netmod@ietf.org>
To: Qin Wu <bill.wu@huawei.com>, =?utf-8?Q?Bal=C3=A1zs_Lengyel?= <balazs.lengyel@ericsson.com>, Ye Niu <niuye@huawei.com>
References: <0100016e60d7d37e-1c626a76-627c-4b43-8718-4c68dd90ef0a-000000@email.amazonses.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11)
X-SES-Outgoing: 2019.12.02-54.240.8.83
Feedback-ID: 1.us-east-1.DKmIRZFhhsBhtmFMNikgwZUWVrODEw9qVcPhqJEI2DA=:AmazonSES
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/dB1KHwyqvw474KWwb2xYPWPDceM>
Subject: Re: [netmod] IPR poll on draft-ietf-netmod-factory-default
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Dec 2019 16:23:19 -0000

Qin and Ye, thank you  for your responses.
Balazs, your response is still pending.

Kent // shepherd


> On Nov 12, 2019, at 1:19 PM, Kent Watsen <kent+ietf@watsen.net> wrote:
> 
> To each author and contributor listed on the "To" line.
> 
> In order to complete the Adoption poll, are you aware of any IPR that applies
> to draft-ietf-netmod-factory-default?  Please Reply-All to *this* email and state either:
> 
> "No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft"
> or
> "Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft"
> 
> If "yes", has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules
> (see RFCs 3669, 5378 and 8179 for more details)?
> 
> If "yes" again, please state either:
> 
> "Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules"
> or
> "No, the IPR has not been disclosed"
> 
> If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think appropriate.
> 
> If you are listed as a document author or contributor please answer the above by
> responding to this email regardless of whether or not you are aware of any relevant
> IPR.  This document will not advance to the next stage until a response has been
> received from each author and listed contributor.  NOTE: THIS APPLIES TO ALL
> OF YOU LISTED IN THIS MESSAGE'S TO LINES.
> 
> If you are on the WG email list or attend WG meetings but are not listed as an author
> or contributor, we remind you of your obligations under the IETF IPR rules which
> encourages you to notify the IETF if you are aware of IPR of others on an IETF
> contribution, or to refrain from participating in any contribution or discussion related
> to your undisclosed IPR. For more information, please see the RFCs listed above
> and http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/wiki/IntellectualProperty <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/wiki/IntellectualProperty>.
> 
> 
> Kent // as Shepherd
> _______________________________________________
> netmod mailing list
> netmod@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod