Re: [netmod] [Anima] revising RFC8366 -- Re: BRSKI-AE enum issue -> empty, but what's he encoding ?

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Wed, 30 June 2021 00:37 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 756193A0E08; Tue, 29 Jun 2021 17:37:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.877
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.877 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, NO_DNS_FOR_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, T_SPF_HELO_TEMPERROR=0.01, T_SPF_TEMPERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Qymk5fm58CB6; Tue, 29 Jun 2021 17:36:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:3:216:3eff:fe7c:d1f3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3A3283A0DFE; Tue, 29 Jun 2021 17:36:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 094CB389DB; Tue, 29 Jun 2021 20:38:57 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id RIS-7ua_PNQT; Tue, 29 Jun 2021 20:38:55 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2::247]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEB7A389DA; Tue, 29 Jun 2021 20:38:54 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 231371801; Tue, 29 Jun 2021 20:36:51 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: "Rob Wilton (rwilton)" <rwilton@cisco.com>, "anima@ietf.org" <anima@ietf.org>, "netmod@ietf.org" <netmod@ietf.org>
cc: Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de>, "Fries, Steffen" <steffen.fries@siemens.com>, Kent Watsen <kent+ietf@watsen.net>
In-Reply-To: <DM4PR11MB5438EE27158CDEAF63F89C97B5039@DM4PR11MB5438.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
References: <20210625190512.GB30200@faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <5025.1624653668@localhost> <DM4PR11MB5438EE27158CDEAF63F89C97B5039@DM4PR11MB5438.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 26.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="==-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2021 20:36:51 -0400
Message-ID: <27560.1625013411@localhost>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/dNGvcvckwuS_pBmkVg_Te8bedZs>
Subject: Re: [netmod] [Anima] revising RFC8366 -- Re: BRSKI-AE enum issue -> empty, but what's he encoding ?
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2021 00:37:02 -0000

Rob Wilton (rwilton) <rwilton@cisco.com> wrote:
    > An RFC8366bis is the right option.  If the changes are minor then I may
    > be able to ease the passage through the IESG, but I can't do much to
    > affect the elapsed time.

I will prepare a draft for this week.

I thought I wrote a really nice ASCII art version of what documents inherit
from RFC8366.  I can't find it in my outbox... I wonder if I nuked the draft
by mistake.

The short of it:
RFC8366 -> RFC8995 (voucher-request)
        -> constrained-voucher (voucher-request, voucher)
        -> brski-async-enroll (voucher-request)
        -> jose-voucher (voucher, voucher-request)

and my question was a bit about how we manage all their things inherited.
It's really the classic CS multiple inheritance problem.

{A Cat is an Mammal
 A Cat is an Four-legged creature
 A Cat is Nocturnal.}

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>   . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
           Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide