Re: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-yang-data-ext version 4

"Rob Wilton (rwilton)" <rwilton@cisco.com> Tue, 01 October 2019 15:01 UTC

Return-Path: <rwilton@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 205EF12085D; Tue, 1 Oct 2019 08:01:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.5
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.5 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com header.b=IwdPR9yL; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com header.b=MuriVnMs
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id O3gyRFIHmkyJ; Tue, 1 Oct 2019 08:01:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-2.cisco.com (alln-iport-2.cisco.com [173.37.142.89]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 09C1312080B; Tue, 1 Oct 2019 08:01:08 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=10132; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1569942069; x=1571151669; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=K4NsA6Sz8oM1xBlTrGkC+rwNJlu/xiGgJGEJKdULsMk=; b=IwdPR9yLVnWTg29Vf3sLU8rMP0kdsTcC0F2fhm7FKcivmZLNBbAspF/s HUxRGxIZlsGq61f62mYjPXI3opIgYfY5Oniz83noZikajqK6AQNrIHyap sHlAo2VekCeYNfUzS15ute4rnykJIxG53HbNPHhkkfYK6XCz9cpmRs6C4 o=;
IronPort-PHdr: =?us-ascii?q?9a23=3AOhmOhBHoMxU0XlSbNVZzPZ1GYnJ96bzpIg4Y7I?= =?us-ascii?q?YmgLtSc6Oluo7vJ1Hb+e4z1A3SRYuO7fVChqKWqK3mVWEaqbe5+HEZON0pNV?= =?us-ascii?q?cejNkO2QkpAcqLE0r+eeT1bigmG8JqX15+9Hb9Ok9QS47z?=
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0AUAAAJaZNd/4oNJK1mGgEBAQEBAgE?= =?us-ascii?q?BAQEMAgEBAQGBVQMBAQEBCwGBGy9QA21WIAQLKgqHXwOKYIJckxeEYIEugSQ?= =?us-ascii?q?DVAkBAQEMAQElCAIBAYRAAoIvIzYHDgIDCQEBBAEBAQIBBQRthS0MhUsBAQE?= =?us-ascii?q?BAxILEBMBASwLAQ8CAQgRBAEBLzIdCAIEAQ0FCBqDAYEdTQMdAQIMpCsCgTi?= =?us-ascii?q?IYYIngn0BAQWBOAKDSxiCFwMGgTQBjA0YgUA/gRFGgkw+gmEBAQIBF4FJK4M?= =?us-ascii?q?SgiaNEIgGmBMKgiKHBo4mgjiHTo8zjiOIHJENAgQCBAUCDgEBBYFZAy8qgS5?= =?us-ascii?q?wFTuCbFAQFIFPg3OFFIU/dAGBKI8hAYEiAQE?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.64,571,1559520000"; d="scan'208,217";a="342571409"
Received: from alln-core-5.cisco.com ([173.36.13.138]) by alln-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 01 Oct 2019 15:01:06 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-002.cisco.com (xch-aln-002.cisco.com [173.36.7.12]) by alln-core-5.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id x91F16Ni004093 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 1 Oct 2019 15:01:06 GMT
Received: from xhs-rcd-001.cisco.com (173.37.227.246) by XCH-ALN-002.cisco.com (173.36.7.12) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Tue, 1 Oct 2019 10:01:06 -0500
Received: from xhs-rcd-001.cisco.com (173.37.227.246) by xhs-rcd-001.cisco.com (173.37.227.246) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Tue, 1 Oct 2019 10:01:05 -0500
Received: from NAM01-SN1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (72.163.14.9) by xhs-rcd-001.cisco.com (173.37.227.246) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 1 Oct 2019 10:01:05 -0500
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=MlnQqX8hid9IvN2PO+SnDVTMBVrRzdofc41i22zN0k5UuyhAKVHJc/dMJZvpfuG6Dnvj8+QVI+Tc6cNXHGWKqEK6sOEgbT+ZmWUyiUlGHAg8Y2VuZ2nlSxuBc0Nsl1Arwi4K9wbJAbs+x/YBorK3vZvJCm87m/I2E+a+eOn5TAt9EGrBPXXY6e7QDosSq9uk7a9uaULX5LAOrqiblQXRTujhFlEorNuWsMgAufzFFaVE2cO+awjF3gQqCCX9/o2UlvX1CEGHENrnRQ6S87Gy1Mr7K6Oavt+GRJhFWqdti0gJLALi/ukTnhZd7Z14+xY47eCC33p9nc6nD4DcB5odLA==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=mYiiQrBFZxiZtqPiMGI4NG8VxbweMoEVBIy9adQxXOk=; b=mpbMdXA6vdWczanIzt9uBYl1OvyIoEzor2p2Shx6wutllLwyzqZea65nVlRVnB5tbBcGTYsHMfYQnzIQSaHxQ+IYbrkq/FasPQgEEI5UV+NUUSya5uK5mNNJ/AwDHLzTlo44EW/AjNtVpRzZxbAYl6FUm5giZkonSmZYPfllwzSkoY1bA2dImLi7bmNaOylXpsc6ypEgPcl8YB8xIbMoDWFX/Xkagvt5md+ylWcq5j2cCQSTOOzQZvLOW8fufpEHlBE6hGvv1S0cCGqZM8E7s0KToFZB3gOscD3yQyngODWcRdtseQK79RGGfLkZ7sUmBdFhGlnsg267S8S2vooFIQ==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cisco.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=cisco.com; dkim=pass header.d=cisco.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-cisco-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=mYiiQrBFZxiZtqPiMGI4NG8VxbweMoEVBIy9adQxXOk=; b=MuriVnMsNDPD6IJlqv2yTn7COZLqFbdO/BRS8T8TQra6CjhdTiObzTEYDMFgNC7eW5ShvO4UE79ZCW4A+CvdFPwwdokvxDzvocfHrNsURSQCTzVmuUUbkpTP0A4U2VnomrqcSbNIj/zprHC4oMmkFKNpDevv3t/hcWm8oWSKe+s=
Received: from MN2PR11MB4366.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (52.135.38.209) by MN2PR11MB4126.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (20.179.149.223) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2305.17; Tue, 1 Oct 2019 15:01:05 +0000
Received: from MN2PR11MB4366.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::cca:41bd:b0bb:c549]) by MN2PR11MB4366.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::cca:41bd:b0bb:c549%2]) with mapi id 15.20.2305.022; Tue, 1 Oct 2019 15:01:04 +0000
From: "Rob Wilton (rwilton)" <rwilton@cisco.com>
To: Joel Jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com>, "draft-ietf-netmod-yang-data-ext@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-netmod-yang-data-ext@ietf.org>
CC: NETMOD Working Group <netmod@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-yang-data-ext version 4
Thread-Index: AQHVdPUFaxWzJBQvFkCRO1cP0jGpVqdF5WVw
Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2019 15:01:04 +0000
Message-ID: <MN2PR11MB436626F5D5BF2869BEF18C83B59D0@MN2PR11MB4366.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
References: <CBBD7EDD-0B53-4720-B76B-7932655FF27A@bogus.com>
In-Reply-To: <CBBD7EDD-0B53-4720-B76B-7932655FF27A@bogus.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=rwilton@cisco.com;
x-originating-ip: [173.38.220.34]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 82015b20-0d54-4b60-9134-08d746802eb9
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: MN2PR11MB4126:
x-ms-exchange-purlcount: 2
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <MN2PR11MB412691438DCB18152AEBA32DB59D0@MN2PR11MB4126.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:10000;
x-forefront-prvs: 0177904E6B
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(4636009)(366004)(396003)(346002)(136003)(376002)(39860400002)(199004)(189003)(6246003)(53546011)(8676002)(256004)(229853002)(54896002)(64756008)(76176011)(6436002)(26005)(8936002)(81166006)(7736002)(102836004)(606006)(66556008)(66066001)(9326002)(186003)(66446008)(6306002)(236005)(9686003)(71200400001)(14444005)(486006)(74316002)(71190400001)(81156014)(76116006)(446003)(478600001)(66476007)(66946007)(6506007)(52536014)(3846002)(25786009)(11346002)(966005)(476003)(7696005)(110136005)(14454004)(86362001)(33656002)(2501003)(4326008)(2906002)(99286004)(316002)(5660300002)(55016002)(6116002)(790700001); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:MN2PR11MB4126; H:MN2PR11MB4366.namprd11.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: cisco.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: I/Qo2pqZvq8sk2K+KLeBiF7s11oaRzgv8VHk07c+IYum/CVPKKEe0yvoB4nLRA7RUKipFvub0BUIMdqV8oUsaDYNzUjeEgEyW9oqk3mS2nEH/kCSCOunheTXGVqEYFUtFrR1Lszjj3ixvSVBIrwuKaaGHRb78OPYPhq0wunW9hqDRM3wKEGyazcdqWLr7FgQqcetMcEMkvhWV5j9JT11wRr22GLfFDHW7NzZN4wp3/JSiJXdvXuBnySakfj+63Rr4FEiSwE0gM9pRWZecSxHxXfn02KPxzJ1rAAFFt3xSQXZG9ayyidni+tW/+O19g25rsvKD90H+QD+wMXUXwqJB3G4K1x/oNA8oARemnNHy/J+oTmXdr3KM7SgN+5TOO8EAxISQEASDpfhzAFQPUeSNF/jeo26wNZzwN+faVJQjE6eKhZmrFPgJNIUjRqCrp2tNy38M9APmP/+YRNTvnP1Aw==
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_MN2PR11MB436626F5D5BF2869BEF18C83B59D0MN2PR11MB4366namp_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 82015b20-0d54-4b60-9134-08d746802eb9
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 01 Oct 2019 15:01:04.7707 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5ae1af62-9505-4097-a69a-c1553ef7840e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: yMP09Zg851NFHt1OF7pdb4RM9Pmo9GeUr/OZzU3WqkieT5jqhXE70Ycw9Txn3vlDA4ZhkHLcm2sB3IEQuNQn5w==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: MN2PR11MB4126
X-OriginatorOrg: cisco.com
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.36.7.12, xch-aln-002.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: alln-core-5.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/dbp4HLjN7Nt4B7mYHN04d2TNdI8>
Subject: Re: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-yang-data-ext version 4
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Oct 2019 15:01:11 -0000

Hi,

I've reviewed this document, and other than 2 minor nits, I believe that it is ready for publication.

Two minor comments:


  1.  Section 1.1.1 NMDA.  There should be a comma before "and are not redefined here".
  2.  I wonder whether it would be useful to have a sentence in the "Definitions" section that defines how a structure is encoded.  Although I appreciate that this is specified in the YANG module itself.  An alternative could be a forward reference from the Definitions section to the YANG module.  This could also cover the Xpath behaviour as well.

Thanks,
Rob


From: netmod <netmod-bounces@ietf.org>; On Behalf Of Joel Jaeggli
Sent: 27 September 2019 06:32
To: NETMOD Working Group <netmod@ietf.org>;
Subject: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-yang-data-ext version 4

All,

This starts a two week working group last call for  draft-ietf-netmod-yang-data-ext-04

The working group last call ends on  Friday October 11th 2019.  Please send your comments to the working group mailing list.

Positive comments, e.g., "I've reviewed this document and believe it is ready for publication", are welcome!  This is useful and important, even from authors.


https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-netmod-yang-data-ext-04


The diff from 03, produced prior to IETF 105 is available here:


https://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?difftype=--hwdiff&url2=draft-ietf-netmod-yang-data-ext-04.txt


Thanks
Joel