Re: [netmod] WGLC: draft-ietf-netmod-geo-location-04

> On Mar 27, 2020, at 1:09 PM, tom petch <ietfc@btconnect.com> wrote:
> 
> Kent
> 
> Not Ready
> 
> I thought that so obvious that it was not worth saying:-)
> 
> e.g.
> IANA considerations does not register the namespace so there is no module

Will add.

> Security Considerations does not use template (which other grouping modules such as Kent's do)

I've pinged Kent for a pointer.

> No YANG version

This means it defaults to 1.0 I thought.

> Wrong prefix for ietf-yang-types

Will change the groupings use from "types" to "yang".

> No reference clause for yang types

Do you mean inside the import ietf-yang-types statement?

> A wholesale lack of YANG reference clauses; perhaps half a dozen needed

I can see 2 places I might could put these, in the "astronomical-body" leaf that references the IAU and in the "geodetic-system" for the default value. We are creating an IANA registry for the values in geodetic-system though so perhaps you are asking for an IANA reference instead? I don't see 4 more obvious places for external references, could you help point them out?

> No Normative reference for yang-types

We add normative document references for imported modules that are not mentioned anywhere else in the actual document? I have no problem doing so, but I haven't done that before.

> Insufficient information for IANA - I infer they are being asked to create a registry but details seem lacking compared to the requirements in RFC8126

Thanks for pointing this out, I'll add this instead of waiting for IANA to complain. :)

Thanks,
Chris.

> 
> At which point I stop and await a fresh revision before having another go.
> 
> Tom Petch
> 
> ________________________________________
> From: netmod <netmod-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of Kent Watsen <kent+ietf@watsen.net>
> Sent: 26 March 2020 18:46
> 
> Dear All,
> 
> This WGLC has received zero responses, which is insufficient to progress the document at this time.  The WGLC is therefore being extended  for another week, now ending April 1st (the day before our Virtual Meeting on April 2nd).
> 
> Again, positive comments, e.g., "I've reviewed this document and believe it is ready for publication", are welcomed.  This is useful and important, even from authors.  Objections, concerns, and suggestions are also welcomed at this time.
> 
> FWIW, the YANG Doctor review was completed on 3/23 (thanks Mahesh) with the “Ready with Nits” status: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/review-ietf-netmod-geo-location-04-yangdoctors-lc-jethanandani-2020-03-23.
> 
> Kent // as shepherd and co-chair
> 
> 
> 
> On Mar 9, 2020, at 6:30 PM, Kent Watsen <kent+ietf@watsen.net<mailto:kent+ietf@watsen.net>> wrote:
> 
> This message begins an almost two-week WGLC for draft-ietf-netmod-geo-location-04 ending on March 22nd (the day before the NETMOD sessions).  Here is a direct link to the HTML version of the draft:
> 
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-netmod-geo-location-04
> 
> Positive comments, e.g., "I've reviewed this document and believe it is ready for publication", are welcome!  This is useful and important, even from authors. Objections, concerns, and suggestions are also welcomed at this time.
> 
> Thank you,
> NETMOD Chairs
> 
> _______________________________________________
> netmod mailing list
> netmod@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> netmod mailing list
> netmod@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod