Re: [netmod] error-message

Martin Bjorklund <mbj@tail-f.com> Mon, 25 March 2019 20:14 UTC

Return-Path: <mbj@tail-f.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55E9B1200B4 for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Mar 2019 13:14:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cON11nV2oh04 for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Mar 2019 13:14:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.tail-f.com (mail.tail-f.com [46.21.102.45]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A7091200A4 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Mar 2019 13:14:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (dhcp-9545.meeting.ietf.org [31.133.149.69]) by mail.tail-f.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6CD9D1AE00A0; Mon, 25 Mar 2019 21:14:07 +0100 (CET)
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2019 21:14:04 +0100 (CET)
Message-Id: <20190325.211404.855691837244375713.mbj@tail-f.com>
To: joey.boyd@adtran.com
Cc: netmod@ietf.org
From: Martin Bjorklund <mbj@tail-f.com>
In-Reply-To: <26CE489EF4611643B3EFE43D06E02654018CCF76FA@ex-mb1.corp.adtran.com>
References: <26CE489EF4611643B3EFE43D06E02654018CCF76FA@ex-mb1.corp.adtran.com>
X-Mailer: Mew version 6.7 on Emacs 24.5 / Mule 6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/dqsnJBNrtJafW-CQxEyqOabjCe0>
Subject: Re: [netmod] error-message
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2019 20:14:11 -0000

Hi,

I think that this should be listed as an acceptable change in secion
11.  Something to fix if we do YANg 1.2.


/martin



JOEY BOYD <joey.boyd@adtran.com> wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I wanted to follow up on this as I have not received any feedback. I
> thinking now that even though it is isn't specifically called out in
> the update section, that adding an error-message could be backward
> compatible as it has no impact on the data or modeled constraint. It
> merely defines the error response which was previously up to the
> implementation to determine.
> 
> Any thoughts on this?
> 
> Regards,
> Joey
> 
> From: JOEY BOYD
> Sent: Monday, March 4, 2019 9:37 AM
> To: 'netmod@ietf.org' <netmod@ietf.org>
> Subject: error-message
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Is the addition of an 'error-message' to an existing 'must' statement
> considered backward compatible? I don't see 'error-message' mentioned
> in the "Updating a Module" section which leads me to believe that it
> isn't but wanted to double check to see what implications adding one
> to an existing module would have.
> 
> Thanks and regards,
> Joey
>