Re: [netmod] 6087bis

Andy Bierman <andy@yumaworks.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 6, 2018 at 11:50 AM, Martin Bjorklund <mbj@tail-f.com> wrote:
> 
> > Hi,
> >
> > Ladislav Lhotka <lhotka@nic.cz> wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Shawn Emery reviewed draft-ietf-netmod-schema-mount-10 and made this
> > > editorial comment:
> > >
> > > OLD:
> > >
> > > These are the subtrees and data nodes and their
> > sensitivity/vulnerability:
> > >
> > > NEW:
> > >
> > > The following should be considered for subtrees/data nodes and their
> > > corresponding sensitivity/vulnerability:
> > >
> >
> 
> 
> I do not think the new text is better.

I agree.  So I suggest we keep the text also in schema mount.

/martin

> I think 6087bis is already stuck waiting for AD approval for a tiny change
> to the security template.
> 
> 
> 
> > > However, the OLD fomulation comes from RFC 6087, so perhaps this change
> > > should be applied in draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6087bis in the first
> > > place. The NEW formulation indeed looks better to me.
> >
> > What is the WG's opinion on this proposed text change?  6087bis is in
> > AUTH48 so if it needs to be changed it must happen now.
> >
> > Of course, we can update
> > https://trac.ietf.org/trac/ops/wiki/yang-security-guidelines even when
> > 6087bis has been published.
> >
> > If we don't want to update the template, I don't think we should
> > update the schema mount draft either.
> >
> >
> > /martin
> >
> >
> >
> Andy
> 
> 
> >
> >
> > >
> > > Lada
> > >
> > > --
> > > Ladislav Lhotka
> > > Head, CZ.NIC Labs
> > > PGP Key ID: 0xB8F92B08A9F76C67
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > netmod mailing list
> > > netmod@ietf.org
> > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
> > >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > netmod mailing list
> > netmod@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
> >

Re: [netmod] 6087bis - Security Considerations template