Re: [netmod] IPR poll on yang-versioning-reqs-02

"Rob Wilton (rwilton)" <rwilton@cisco.com> Thu, 14 March 2019 09:37 UTC

Return-Path: <rwilton@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E72D128B36 for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 14 Mar 2019 02:37:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.5
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.5 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rVY2lFVyTpIa for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 14 Mar 2019 02:37:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-2.cisco.com (alln-iport-2.cisco.com [173.37.142.89]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B93B7128BCC for <netmod@ietf.org>; Thu, 14 Mar 2019 02:37:15 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=8453; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1552556235; x=1553765835; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=g6dC46gEUkcbpno+pPSFec93AdENlGNw0B3fgZAoKcY=; b=F+Vwt1OlHEX6ldKVHVSEJdqAz/CJpfaFcuzYGlmoqE4IB71dS5jtriXQ 816qgc3Q8DkYehTSTKOeExEwDi8oSALQ50cnqCSnqRQolwQdAY4/37T7s IcIS6ea4RKGYKthRKNPUtufN9hOf5irIVUdYCDnIyI1hCSlhszUQRgj/8 E=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0ADAAB8H4pc/5tdJa1kGQEBAQEBAQE?= =?us-ascii?q?BAQEBAQcBAQEBAQGBUQQBAQEBAQsBgQ1TL2iBAycKjB2NLIkxiQmFdhSBZws?= =?us-ascii?q?BASOESQKETiI0CQ0BAQMBAQkBAwJtHAyFSgEBAQQtRwUQAgEIEAEEAQEvIRE?= =?us-ascii?q?dCAIEAQ0FCIMbgRFMAxUPrzaEBAGEBg2CH4EvAYssF4FAP4ERgxKCVzwLAoE?= =?us-ascii?q?uARIBhgADig+GT2mSRDUJAodWg3+ECYM3IYF7WoUQi2aKf4VzgTKLQgIRFYE?= =?us-ascii?q?oDRI4ZXFwFTuCbAmLA4UIATZBMQGNaIEfgR8BAQ?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.58,478,1544486400"; d="scan'208,217";a="245417986"
Received: from rcdn-core-4.cisco.com ([173.37.93.155]) by alln-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 14 Mar 2019 09:37:14 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-014.cisco.com (xch-rcd-014.cisco.com [173.37.102.24]) by rcdn-core-4.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id x2E9bEnj020347 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Thu, 14 Mar 2019 09:37:14 GMT
Received: from xch-rcd-007.cisco.com (173.37.102.17) by XCH-RCD-014.cisco.com (173.37.102.24) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Thu, 14 Mar 2019 04:37:14 -0500
Received: from xch-rcd-007.cisco.com ([173.37.102.17]) by XCH-RCD-007.cisco.com ([173.37.102.17]) with mapi id 15.00.1473.003; Thu, 14 Mar 2019 04:37:14 -0500
From: "Rob Wilton (rwilton)" <rwilton@cisco.com>
To: Kent Watsen <kent+ietf@watsen.net>, "Joe Clarke (jclarke)" <jclarke@cisco.com>, =?iso-8859-1?Q?Bal=E1zs_Lengyel?= <balazs.lengyel@ericsson.com>, "Benoit Claise (bclaise)" <bclaise@cisco.com>, Ebben Aries <exa@juniper.net>, Jason Sterne <jason.sterne@nokia.com>, "Juergen Schoenwaelder" <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de>, Mahesh Jethanandani <mjethanandani@gmail.com>, "Michael (Wangzitao)" <wangzitao@huawei.com>, "Qin Wu" <bill.wu@huawei.com>, "Reshad Rahman (rrahman)" <rrahman@cisco.com>
CC: "netmod@ietf.org" <netmod@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: IPR poll on yang-versioning-reqs-02
Thread-Index: AQHU2duJzXEipOU2+0iwjlJwZAzOMaYK3x1g
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2019 09:37:13 +0000
Message-ID: <639bbd3e42a249a0a18caf0ef9ef5006@XCH-RCD-007.cisco.com>
References: <0100016978bf4dca-d79bb929-31d1-4ed5-bdcc-b536d5aecdf0-000000@email.amazonses.com>
In-Reply-To: <0100016978bf4dca-d79bb929-31d1-4ed5-bdcc-b536d5aecdf0-000000@email.amazonses.com>
Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.63.23.135]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_639bbd3e42a249a0a18caf0ef9ef5006XCHRCD007ciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.37.102.24, xch-rcd-014.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: rcdn-core-4.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/e55f28Q1EFgA0pXbj7zyHXUjOMY>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 14 Mar 2019 07:23:34 -0700
Subject: Re: [netmod] IPR poll on yang-versioning-reqs-02
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2019 09:37:20 -0000

No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft.

Thanks,
Rob

From: Kent Watsen <kent+ietf@watsen.net>;
Sent: 13 March 2019 20:30
To: Joe Clarke (jclarke) <jclarke@cisco.com>;; Balázs Lengyel <balazs.lengyel@ericsson.com>;; Benoit Claise (bclaise) <bclaise@cisco.com>;; Ebben Aries <exa@juniper.net>;; Jason Sterne <jason.sterne@nokia.com>;; Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de>;; Mahesh Jethanandani <mjethanandani@gmail.com>;; Michael (Wangzitao) <wangzitao@huawei.com>;; Qin Wu <bill.wu@huawei.com>;; Reshad Rahman (rrahman) <rrahman@cisco.com>;; Rob Wilton (rwilton) <rwilton@cisco.com>;
Cc: netmod@ietf.org
Subject: IPR poll on yang-versioning-reqs-02

To each author and contributor listed on the "To" line.

In order to complete the Adoption poll, are you aware of any IPR that applies
to yang-versioning-reqs-02?  Please Reply-All to *this* email and state either:

"No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft"
or
"Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft"

If "yes", has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules
(see RFCs 3669, 5378 and 8179 for more details)?

If "yes" again, please state either:

"Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules"
or
"No, the IPR has not been disclosed"

If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think appropriate.

If you are listed as a document author or contributor please answer the above by
responding to this email regardless of whether or not you are aware of any relevant
IPR.  This document will not advance to the next stage until a response has been
received from each author and listed contributor.  NOTE: THIS APPLIES TO ALL
OF YOU LISTED IN THIS MESSAGE'S TO LINES.

If you are on the WG email list or attend WG meetings but are not listed as an author
or contributor, we remind you of your obligations under the IETF IPR rules which
encourages you to notify the IETF if you are aware of IPR of others on an IETF
contribution, or to refrain from participating in any contribution or discussion related
to your undisclosed IPR. For more information, please see the RFCs listed above
and http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/wiki/IntellectualProperty.

Thank you,
Kent // as co-Chair