Re: [netmod] Adoption poll for draft-wu-netmod-factory-default-02

On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 3:19 PM Rob Wilton (rwilton) <rwilton@cisco.com>
wrote:

> If you do a factory reset, does that also mean that the device should be
> rebooted at the same time to get it into a consistent state?
>
>
>
> Or should clients have the opportunity to update the config after the
> reset and before it has been rebooted?
>
>
>
> Or is it not necessary to reboot the device at all?
>
>
>

I have not seen factory reset of datastores supported at all.
It is always the service or the device.
Sound like you are talking about the SysVinit command "reload" vs.
"restart".

IMO it would be a good goal to support this framework by providing
factory-reload and factory-restart RPC operations.

Thanks,
>
> Rob
>

Andy

>
>
>
>
> *From:* netmod <netmod-bounces@ietf.org> *On Behalf Of *Andy Bierman
> *Sent:* 25 March 2019 23:11
> *To:* Kent Watsen <kent+ietf@watsen.net>
> *Cc:* NetMod WG <netmod@ietf.org>
> *Subject:* Re: [netmod] Adoption poll for
> draft-wu-netmod-factory-default-02
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 1:35 PM Kent Watsen <kent+ietf@watsen.net> wrote:
>
> This email begins a 2-week adoption poll for:
>
>
>
>     https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-wu-netmod-factory-default-02
>
>
>
> Please voice your support or objections before April 8.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> I have significant concerns about this draft and work item.
>
> The intentions are good and the scope is well-defined.
>
> The problem is that this is a very proprietary implementation detail.
>
>
>
> I have already raised the issue that our server cannot factory reset a
> single datastore.
>
> It can only do that for the whole server (which will setup the datastores
>
> in an implementation manner and order). So another RPC is needed, and
> if-features..
>
>
>
> I have seen some comments on this issue: "This is great but our server
>
> does not work that way, so we need X,Y,Z"  (Just like I am doing ;-)
>
> How will the WG keep that from happening 10 or 30 times?
>
>
>
> I support this work if the WG can figure out how to keep it simple.
>
> (Meaning I support adoption of the work but not going to wait 2+ years for
> it)
>
>
>
>
>
> Kent (and Lou)
>
>
>
> Andy
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> netmod mailing list
> netmod@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
>
>