Re: [netmod] Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-netmod-routing-cfg-23

"Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com> Fri, 26 August 2016 19:35 UTC

Return-Path: <acee@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D6CD12D7B4; Fri, 26 Aug 2016 12:35:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -15.068
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.068 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.548, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KBvRc8Hmbj_U; Fri, 26 Aug 2016 12:35:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-8.cisco.com (alln-iport-8.cisco.com [173.37.142.95]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2E44012D7CD; Fri, 26 Aug 2016 12:35:54 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=11973; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1472240154; x=1473449754; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=5i3TmuzEy0mn8TQa5SR37kFsYA3GgEyXdxRvwMRomJw=; b=LnzxeDJk/Ldq0pawfk5hq3tisf0P5fIhKd4htDNvDv5N+rORs13lwXuc 1CLHDxTzbJ2yhfy5EBPOiKFMkRSzbi+oxKbJfaLfbhNimL1yZwjJXLFR1 HXGdc1Pu/clJKQc3LgFcs+MzB8vE8t7IlFlG6mZh1qlzBT4DpNL48QOYm c=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0AlAgC2mcBX/5hdJa1dGgEBAQGCcDMBAQEBAR5WfAeNKKVvhQmCASSFeQIcgTQ4FAEBAQEBAQEBAQFeJ4RhAQEBBCNRBRACAQgOAwMBAigDAgICMBQJCAIEAQ0FiDgOsA6PNQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBARyKe4QSEQEzCYJigloFmUwBhh+JCYFtToQPiQiMQ4N4AQ8PNoQccAGELIEgfwEBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.28,582,1464652800"; d="scan'208,217";a="315718325"
Received: from rcdn-core-1.cisco.com ([173.37.93.152]) by alln-iport-8.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 26 Aug 2016 19:35:53 +0000
Received: from XCH-RTP-013.cisco.com (xch-rtp-013.cisco.com [64.101.220.153]) by rcdn-core-1.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u7QJZqpg015104 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Fri, 26 Aug 2016 19:35:53 GMT
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com (64.101.220.155) by XCH-RTP-013.cisco.com (64.101.220.153) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Fri, 26 Aug 2016 15:35:52 -0400
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) by XCH-RTP-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) with mapi id 15.00.1210.000; Fri, 26 Aug 2016 15:35:52 -0400
From: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>
To: Kent Watsen <kwatsen@juniper.net>, Ladislav Lhotka <lhotka@nic.cz>
Thread-Topic: Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-netmod-routing-cfg-23
Thread-Index: AQHR/8NtBYbihfSd2UO+EQ0BQo+j6KBbopAA
Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2016 19:35:51 +0000
Message-ID: <D3E61222.7B6E6%acee@cisco.com>
References: <5E95D548-556B-481F-BC97-4C7E2FB876CF@juniper.net>
In-Reply-To: <5E95D548-556B-481F-BC97-4C7E2FB876CF@juniper.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.116.152.198]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_D3E612227B6E6aceeciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/eOP-EW8gFE0mDaAChE4jePEXrpM>
Cc: "netmod-chairs@ietf.org" <netmod-chairs@ietf.org>, "netmod@ietf.org" <netmod@ietf.org>, Routing WG <rtgwg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [netmod] Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-netmod-routing-cfg-23
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2016 19:35:57 -0000

Speaker as an author,

No, I am not aware of an IPR that applies to this draft.

Thanks,
Acee

From: Kent Watsen <kwatsen@juniper.net<mailto:kwatsen@juniper.net>>
Date: Friday, August 26, 2016 at 1:58 PM
To: Ladislav Lhotka <lhotka@nic.cz<mailto:lhotka@nic.cz>>, Acee Lindem <acee@cisco.com<mailto:acee@cisco.com>>
Cc: "netmod@ietf.org<mailto:netmod@ietf.org>" <netmod@ietf.org<mailto:netmod@ietf.org>>, "netmod-chairs@ietf.org<mailto:netmod-chairs@ietf.org>" <netmod-chairs@ietf.org<mailto:netmod-chairs@ietf.org>>
Subject: Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-netmod-routing-cfg-23


Authors, Contributors, WG,



As part of the WG Last Call, are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft identified above?  Please state either:

  * "No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft"

  * "Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft"



If “yes”, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details)?   Please state either:

  * "Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules"

  * "No, the IPR has not been disclosed"



If you answer “no”, please provide any additional details you think appropriate.



If you are listed as a document author or contributor, please answer the above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR. This document will not advance to the next stage until a response has been received from each author and listed contributor. NOTE: THIS APPLIES TO ALL OF YOU LISTED IN THIS MESSAGE'S TO LINES.



If you are on the WG email list or attend WG meetings but are not listed as an author or contributor, we remind you of your obligations under the IETF IPR rules which encourages you to notify the IETF if you are aware of IPR of others on an IETF contribution, or to refrain from participating in any contribution or discussion related to your undisclosed IPR. For more information, please see the RFCs listed above and http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/wiki/IntellectualProperty.



PS: Please include all listed in the headers of this message in your response.



Thank you,

NETMOD WG Chairs