Re: [netmod] Adoption poll for draft-wwx-netmod-event-yang-10

Qin Wu <bill.wu@huawei.com> Thu, 24 December 2020 13:22 UTC

Return-Path: <bill.wu@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E07203A1241 for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 24 Dec 2020 05:22:09 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MueVbdsRxy-5 for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 24 Dec 2020 05:22:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com (frasgout.his.huawei.com [185.176.79.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C6D7D3A123F for <netmod@ietf.org>; Thu, 24 Dec 2020 05:22:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from fraeml738-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.147.206]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4D1rJd4YvLz67SNC; Thu, 24 Dec 2020 21:19:29 +0800 (CST)
Received: from fraeml738-chm.china.huawei.com (10.206.15.219) by fraeml738-chm.china.huawei.com (10.206.15.219) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2106.2; Thu, 24 Dec 2020 14:21:58 +0100
Received: from DGGEML406-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.17.50) by fraeml738-chm.china.huawei.com (10.206.15.219) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_0, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA) id 15.1.2106.2 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 24 Dec 2020 14:21:58 +0100
Received: from DGGEML531-MBS.china.huawei.com ([169.254.5.102]) by dggeml406-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.3.17.50]) with mapi id 14.03.0487.000; Thu, 24 Dec 2020 21:21:55 +0800
From: Qin Wu <bill.wu@huawei.com>
To: Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de>, NETMOD Group <netmod@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [netmod] Adoption poll for draft-wwx-netmod-event-yang-10
Thread-Index: AdbZ9sktDUL9xJkARXqKW9CC+aYwQQ==
Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2020 13:21:55 +0000
Message-ID: <B8F9A780D330094D99AF023C5877DABAADC5ED01@dggeml531-mbs.china.huawei.com>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.136.101.103]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/eaMqwqqNDXAv4z2FcQWutDijccI>
Subject: Re: [netmod] Adoption poll for draft-wwx-netmod-event-yang-10
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2020 13:22:10 -0000

Speaking for myself, breaking down ECA logic or ECA paradigm, extracting policy variable from the event, Mapping Policy Variables to XPath Variables, using standard function call defined in ECA XPath Function Library will guarantee us to create an interoperable standard, the last one is the most important one, I think that is the key difference with the previous attempts. We spent a quite a lot of time to discuss this and got this agreed in the design team.

-Qin
-----邮件原件-----
发件人: netmod [mailto:netmod-bounces@ietf.org] 代表 Juergen Schoenwaelder
发送时间: 2020年12月24日 16:25
收件人: NETMOD Group <netmod@ietf.org>
主题: Re: [netmod] Adoption poll for draft-wwx-netmod-event-yang-10

On Wed, Dec 23, 2020 at 07:08:52PM +0100, Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote:
> 
> ECA work has a long 20+ year tradition in the IETF and several 
> specifications have been published over the years by various working 
> groups. As far as I can tell, none of them got traction in terms of 
> signifiant deployment of interoperable implementations.
> 
> I would have hoped that the next iteration of ECA work would have 
> started with a deep reflection about why all the previous attempts 
> failed to gain traction and some genuine insights how to design things 
> differently in order to improve the likelihood to have impact.
>

Let me be a bit more explicit.

I would have expected that the senior IETF people mentioned as co-authors or contributors, who are very well familiar with the relevant history (Benoit Claise, Andy Bierman, Alex Clemm), would have explained here (or in the document) why this approach to create an interoperable standard for ECA has potential to succeed given the limited success of the prior attempts.

Adopting this work without having answered this question seems premature. If the proponents of this work do not have an answer to this question, the WG will likely not find one either.

/js

-- 
Juergen Schoenwaelder           Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH
Phone: +49 421 200 3587         Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany
Fax:   +49 421 200 3103         <https://www.jacobs-university.de/>

_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
netmod@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod