Re: [netmod] rfc6991bis: yang:longitude, yang:latitude, yang:postal-code, yang:country-code
Qin Wu <bill.wu@huawei.com> Thu, 30 July 2020 13:28 UTC
Return-Path: <bill.wu@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4EDE3A1138 for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Jul 2020 06:28:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1sD1QK81pqZ2 for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Jul 2020 06:28:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [185.176.76.210]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E55643A1137 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Thu, 30 Jul 2020 06:28:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhreml722-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.7.107]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 7FCF1AF1F8CE394C3C58; Thu, 30 Jul 2020 14:28:21 +0100 (IST)
Received: from lhreml722-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.73) by lhreml722-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.73) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.1913.5; Thu, 30 Jul 2020 14:28:21 +0100
Received: from DGGEML404-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.17.39) by lhreml722-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.73) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_0, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA) id 15.1.1913.5 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 30 Jul 2020 14:28:21 +0100
Received: from DGGEML511-MBS.china.huawei.com ([169.254.4.170]) by DGGEML404-HUB.china.huawei.com ([fe80::b177:a243:7a69:5ab8%31]) with mapi id 14.03.0487.000; Thu, 30 Jul 2020 21:28:17 +0800
From: Qin Wu <bill.wu@huawei.com>
To: Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de>, "netmod@ietf.org" <netmod@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [netmod] rfc6991bis: yang:longitude, yang:latitude, yang:postal-code, yang:country-code
Thread-Index: AdZmdIRn8PvTNhviSjqdKZcwCSEMyw==
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2020 13:28:17 +0000
Message-ID: <B8F9A780D330094D99AF023C5877DABAAD8A8561@dggeml511-mbs.china.huawei.com>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.164.151.60]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/ebekXwoJXSpopKAa7MUGqdgJgA4>
Subject: Re: [netmod] rfc6991bis: yang:longitude, yang:latitude, yang:postal-code, yang:country-code
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2020 13:28:26 -0000
See geolocation definition in draft-ietf-teas-yang-te-topo-22 which defines longitude and latitude, altitude. I know it is beneficial for future document to import these types from rfc6991bis instead of from te topo model. -Qin -----邮件原件----- 发件人: netmod [mailto:netmod-bounces@ietf.org] 代表 Juergen Schoenwaelder 发送时间: 2020年7月18日 3:16 收件人: netmod@ietf.org 主题: [netmod] rfc6991bis: yang:longitude, yang:latitude, yang:postal-code, yang:country-code - It was suggested to add types for longitude, latitude, postal code, country-code. Do we go there or do we leave these for other modules to define? It seems such definitions should go into draft-ietf-netmod-geo-location. - Geo location is covered by draft-ietf-netmod-geo-location (so do nothing). - For country codes, there is ISO 3166, which defines two-letter, three-letter, and numeric country codes. I assume people wanted two-letter codes (as used in the DNS), i.e. they want DE and not DEU. But note that it is GB and not UK, i.e., what we commonly use in the DNS may not be exactly ISO 3166. (The devil is always in the details.) - For postal codes, it is unclear what the requirements are or what a proper definition for postal codes is. It is not entirely clear what the authoritative definition of the format of postal codes is, perhaps the Universal Postal Union. - Options: (i) do nothing or (ii) add a country code definition only or (iii) add both a country code definition and a postal code definition (which might be to some extend vague) - Proposal: do nothing -- Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany Fax: +49 421 200 3103 <https://www.jacobs-university.de/> _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list netmod@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
- [netmod] rfc6991bis: yang:longitude, yang:latitud… Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [netmod] rfc6991bis: yang:longitude, yang:lat… Qin Wu
- Re: [netmod] rfc6991bis: yang:longitude, yang:lat… Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [netmod] rfc6991bis: yang:longitude, yang:lat… Qin Wu
- Re: [netmod] rfc6991bis: yang:longitude, yang:lat… Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [netmod] rfc6991bis: yang:longitude, yang:lat… Qin Wu
- Re: [netmod] rfc6991bis: yang:longitude, yang:lat… Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [netmod] rfc6991bis: yang:longitude, yang:lat… Christian Hopps
- Re: [netmod] rfc6991bis: yang:longitude, yang:lat… Reshad Rahman (rrahman)
- Re: [netmod] rfc6991bis: yang:longitude, yang:lat… Qin Wu
- Re: [netmod] rfc6991bis: yang:longitude, yang:lat… Christian Hopps
- Re: [netmod] rfc6991bis: yang:longitude, yang:lat… Juergen Schoenwaelder