Re: [netmod] IPR call on draft-ietf-netmod-acl-model-18

[Lisa Huang <[e-mail]>]

Hi Kent,

No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft.

Regards,
Lisa


On Tue, May 1, 2018 at 1:03 PM, Kent Watsen <[e-mail]> wrote:

> Thank you, Mahesh and Sonal.
>
> I'm still waiting to hear from Lisa and Dana.  Neither have been heard
> from since the pen moved a couple years ago.  Is anyone aware of Lisa or
> Dana's current email?
>
> Let's give it a few days but, if we don't hear back from them shortly, I
> recommend moving their names from authors to contributors so we can unblock
> the publishing process.
>
> Thanks,
> Kent // shepherd
>
>
> ===== original message =====
>
> Authors, Contributors, WG,
>
> As part of Shepherd write-up for the acl-model draft, we need to ensure
> that all IPR has been declared.  There was an IPR-call before, when there
> was a different set of authors involved, but not since, so it seems prudent
> to do another call now.
>
> Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft identified above?
>
>
> Please state either:
>     "No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft"
>   or
>     "Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft"
>
>
> If yes, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules
> (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details)? Please state
> either:
>     "Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules"
>   or
>     "No, the IPR has not been disclosed"
>
> If no, please provide any additional details you think appropriate.
>
>
> If you are listed as a document author or contributor, please answer the
> above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not you are
> aware of any relevant IPR. This document will not advance to the next
> stage until a response has been received from each author and listed
> contributor. NOTE: THIS APPLIES TO ALL OF YOU LISTED IN THIS MESSAGE'S
> TO LINES.
>
>
> If you are on the WG email list or attend WG meetings but are not listed
> as an author or contributor, we remind you of your obligations under the
> IETF IPR rules which encourages you to notify the IETF if you are aware
> of IPR of others on an IETF contribution, or to refrain from participating
> in any contribution or discussion related to your undisclosed IPR. For
> more information, please see the RFCs listed above and
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__trac.
> tools.ietf.org_group_iesg_trac_wiki_IntellectualProperty&d=DwICAg&
> c=HAkYuh63rsuhr6Scbfh0UjBXeMK-ndb3voDTXcWzoCI&r=
> 9zkP0xnJUvZGJ9EPoOH7Yhqn2gsBYaGTvjISlaJdcZo&m=yj0hQ9S_
> xraeKbiSv7McZY1diBVVR4EU78hnklrI24I&s=xX-ih-MpZ1qkXhYls1UQDAK7WuTJnOc29n7Z
> p4nk_Gc&e=.
>
> Thank you,
>
> Kent // document shepherd and co-chair
>
>
> PS: Please include all listed in the headers of this message in your
> response.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> netmod mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.
> ietf.org_mailman_listinfo_netmod&d=DwICAg&c=HAkYuh63rsuhr6Scbfh0UjBXeMK-
> ndb3voDTXcWzoCI&r=9zkP0xnJUvZGJ9EPoOH7Yhqn2gsBYaGTvjISlaJdcZo&m=yj0hQ9S_
> xraeKbiSv7McZY1diBVVR4EU78hnklrI24I&s=m-pbImTlMIVO07ILC0SphA-b3D-
> 3urMSOPR3YSWwQXk&e=
>
>
>