Re: [netmod] Missing references

Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com> Thu, 08 February 2018 13:40 UTC

Return-Path: <bclaise@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDC2812D963 for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Feb 2018 05:40:58 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.511
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id W64yBgptfaps for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Feb 2018 05:40:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from aer-iport-1.cisco.com (aer-iport-1.cisco.com [173.38.203.51]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1199512D957 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Thu, 8 Feb 2018 05:40:56 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1219; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1518097257; x=1519306857; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:mime-version: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Fz0sXQ+2hj0evO9dho3h/ihGqA9Zo8g75H2othmsFXE=; b=G3yTvpefC0YQ8NXrzt/aMVsVk1QGnx7L1OpUGA8GV4jLvVON3e2vaqU+ 2MECxMd2G3XMkhtmtrzYmiAjwgOmLQM2FU/vzKX5S8A8r0yNDCOI/mhcZ Yaezj2JGTeQ/Ig9a0lMggo+IXcwxOItyzjtIZARR8r/sTNXQZUZQ8lHKu I=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0ByAQDVUnxa/xbLJq1dGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQcBAQEBAYUnhA2LGI80mW0KhTsCgwIUAQIBAQEBAQECayiFJAEFIxVRCxgCAiYCAlcGAQwIAQGKMa88gieFAIN3ggoBAQEBAQEEAQEBAQEjgQ+DaoNsghGDBYg5gmUFpCsJlXyMOIgGj3WIF4E8NiKBUDMaCBsVgwSEd0COCAEBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.46,478,1511827200"; d="scan'208";a="1942938"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-1.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 08 Feb 2018 13:40:54 +0000
Received: from [10.55.221.36] (ams-bclaise-nitro3.cisco.com [10.55.221.36]) by aer-core-1.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id w18DesUY016076; Thu, 8 Feb 2018 13:40:54 GMT
To: Henrik Levkowetz <henrik@levkowetz.com>, "t.petch" <ietfc@btconnect.com>, NETMOD Working Group <netmod@ietf.org>
References: <26131545-049c-9a1a-eb2b-cdad6fce3190@cisco.com> <036201d39c25$7bb5a060$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net> <db7e2a8d-ab53-5930-99cc-8b257190b519@cisco.com> <ddb71ff2-3152-f51c-c346-f914400e0367@levkowetz.com>
From: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <6ea61665-d90d-5ac8-41a2-e3df36ff130b@cisco.com>
Date: Thu, 08 Feb 2018 14:40:54 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <ddb71ff2-3152-f51c-c346-f914400e0367@levkowetz.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/fL-RglsyH68DPBGn8nXX2x2miXI>
Subject: Re: [netmod] Missing references
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Feb 2018 13:40:59 -0000

Hi Henrik,

It makes sense. Thanks.

Regards, B.
> Hi Benoit,
>
> On 2018-02-07 12:56, Benoit Claise wrote:
>> Hi Henrik,
>>
>> Could this check be added to idnits?
> Yes.  I thought I had something like this already, but it was specifically
> to look out for mentions of RFC2119.
>
> As you may know, I'm due to begin a complete rewrite of idnits, from the
> current implementation (idnits started as a 10-line AWK program to check
> draft line lengths, in 2000 or 2001) to Python, this March.  I'd like to
> defer this till then; adding code to the now close to 4000 lines of mixed
> AWK and bash isn't always straightforward.
>
>
> Best regards,
>
> 	Henrik
>
>> Regards, Benoit
>>> I just came across (yet) another example of a reference to an RFC in a
>>> description clause of a YANG module that appears nowhere else in the
>>> I-D.
>>>
>>> This seems to be a systematic error that some YANG module authors make;
>>> can the tools be modified to pick it up?  The logic is simple enough.
>>>
>>> The latest example is in draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-rip-09 which fails to
>>> reference RFC5952;  I think that the I-D is in the RFC Editor queue.
>>>
>>> Tom Petch
>>>
>>> .
>>>
>>