Re: [netmod] WGLC on draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6991-bis-11
Benoit Claise <benoit.claise@huawei.com> Tue, 15 February 2022 13:37 UTC
Return-Path: <benoit.claise@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FA663A0C36 for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Feb 2022 05:37:57 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.714, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qFMotZgCUNuN for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Feb 2022 05:37:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com (frasgout.his.huawei.com [185.176.79.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 89D6A3A0BEC for <netmod@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Feb 2022 05:37:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from fraeml736-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.147.201]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4JyhwN71Mjz67LDB; Tue, 15 Feb 2022 21:37:24 +0800 (CST)
Received: from [10.126.171.192] (10.126.171.192) by fraeml736-chm.china.huawei.com (10.206.15.217) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2308.21; Tue, 15 Feb 2022 14:37:45 +0100
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------AcwYnbZb6XAPPxvkjj1ht0CV"
Message-ID: <3a8a28d7-0254-d4e8-0cff-55823d99b1d2@huawei.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2022 14:37:40 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.5.0
Content-Language: en-GB
To: Mahesh Jethanandani <mjethanandani@gmail.com>, netmod@ietf.org
References: <688072256.676638.1644847512655@mail.yahoo.com> <C0C60CE9-43A8-40B1-BB6C-FF97A61C1FAE@gmail.com>
From: Benoit Claise <benoit.claise@huawei.com>
In-Reply-To: <C0C60CE9-43A8-40B1-BB6C-FF97A61C1FAE@gmail.com>
X-Originating-IP: [10.126.171.192]
X-ClientProxiedBy: dggems705-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.182) To fraeml736-chm.china.huawei.com (10.206.15.217)
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/fN-M-zwT4KycbIxMJXGFCCbtdvI>
Subject: Re: [netmod] WGLC on draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6991-bis-11
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2022 13:38:03 -0000
+1 B. On 2/14/2022 11:49 PM, Mahesh Jethanandani wrote: > I have followed the discussions on this draft and believe it is ready > for publication. > >> >> On Thursday, February 3, 2022, 09:54:23 PM EST, Kent Watsen >> <kent+ietf@watsen.net> wrote: >> >> >> Dear NETMOD WG, >> >> This message begins a two-week WGLC for >> draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6991-bis-11 ending on Friday, February 18th. >> Here is a direct link to the HTML version of the draft: >> >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6991-bis-11.html >> >> Positive comments, e.g., "I've reviewed this document and believe it >> is ready for publication", are welcome! This is useful and >> important, even from authors. Objections, concerns, and suggestions >> are also welcomed at this time. >> >> Thank you, >> Kent (as co-chair) >> >> _______________________________________________ >> netmod mailing list >> netmod@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod >> _______________________________________________ >> netmod mailing list >> netmod@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod > > _______________________________________________ > netmod mailing list > netmod@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
- [netmod] WGLC on draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6991-bis-11 Kent Watsen
- Re: [netmod] WGLC on draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6991-bi… Reshad Rahman
- Re: [netmod] WGLC on draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6991-bi… Kent Watsen
- Re: [netmod] WGLC on draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6991-bi… Mahesh Jethanandani
- Re: [netmod] WGLC on draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6991-bi… Qin Wu
- Re: [netmod] WGLC on draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6991-bi… maqiufang (A)
- Re: [netmod] WGLC on draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6991-bi… Benoit Claise
- Re: [netmod] WGLC on draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6991-bi… Charles Eckel (eckelcu)
- Re: [netmod] WGLC on draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6991-bi… Martin Björklund
- Re: [netmod] WGLC on draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6991-bi… Jürgen Schönwälder
- Re: [netmod] WGLC on draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6991-bi… Andy Bierman
- Re: [netmod] WGLC on draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6991-bi… Vladimir Vassilev
- Re: [netmod] WGLC on draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6991-bi… Kent Watsen
- Re: [netmod] WGLC on draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6991-bi… Jürgen Schönwälder
- Re: [netmod] WGLC on draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6991-bi… Jürgen Schönwälder
- Re: [netmod] WGLC on draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6991-bi… Martin Björklund
- Re: [netmod] WGLC on draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6991-bi… Jürgen Schönwälder
- Re: [netmod] WGLC on draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6991-bi… Martin Björklund
- Re: [netmod] WGLC on draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6991-bi… Jürgen Schönwälder
- Re: [netmod] WGLC on draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6991-bi… Martin Björklund
- Re: [netmod] WGLC on draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6991-bi… Jürgen Schönwälder
- Re: [netmod] WGLC on draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6991-bi… Kent Watsen
- Re: [netmod] WGLC on draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6991-bi… Andy Bierman
- Re: [netmod] WGLC on draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6991-bi… Jürgen Schönwälder
- Re: [netmod] WGLC on draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6991-bi… Andy Bierman
- Re: [netmod] WGLC on draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6991-bi… Jürgen Schönwälder
- Re: [netmod] WGLC on draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6991-bi… tom petch
- Re: [netmod] WGLC on draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6991-bi… Kent Watsen
- Re: [netmod] WGLC on draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6991-bi… Acee Lindem (acee)
- Re: [netmod] WGLC on draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6991-bi… Kent Watsen
- Re: [netmod] WGLC on draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6991-bi… Jürgen Schönwälder
- Re: [netmod] WGLC on draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6991-bi… tom petch
- Re: [netmod] WGLC on draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6991-bi… Jürgen Schönwälder
- Re: [netmod] WGLC on draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6991-bi… Kent Watsen
- Re: [netmod] WGLC on draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6991-bi… Jürgen Schönwälder
- Re: [netmod] WGLC on draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6991-bi… tom petch
- Re: [netmod] WGLC on draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6991-bi… Martin Björklund
- Re: [netmod] WGLC on draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6991-bi… Jürgen Schönwälder
- Re: [netmod] WGLC on draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6991-bi… Carsten Bormann
- Re: [netmod] WGLC on draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6991-bi… tom petch