Re: [netmod] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-netmod-routing-cfg-23 (until Sep 9, 2016)

Kent Watsen <kwatsen@juniper.net> Wed, 31 August 2016 18:11 UTC

Return-Path: <kwatsen@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E32C512D5FB for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 31 Aug 2016 11:11:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.921
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.921 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=junipernetworks.onmicrosoft.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Hrek69wiqPtP for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 31 Aug 2016 11:11:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from NAM03-DM3-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-dm3nam03on0129.outbound.protection.outlook.com [104.47.41.129]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3FF9D12D624 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Wed, 31 Aug 2016 11:11:17 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=junipernetworks.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-juniper-net; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=5g2F2leczT3NocsfzucH5ICf6ViVKlyK9D7AFKUTEYs=; b=JyQm0eoF8nnbvybjKWZK/pxeaXVZOqC5cN6Ciez2KiGegQ+Nj4B+VE7C0lWjdpM3ddrBWu3JcxnkAvmryEfK6WhkIUhu03DPKABP5Fdv1fujqow+bczbhavlgm1Tq31Pd/K6xPRHCA7k0U64tvzQuI5zNDW8fHha1rk+kKt3Qo8=
Received: from CY1PR0501MB1450.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.160.149.11) by CY1PR0501MB1450.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.160.149.11) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_0, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA_P384) id 15.1.609.3; Wed, 31 Aug 2016 18:11:14 +0000
Received: from CY1PR0501MB1450.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([10.160.149.11]) by CY1PR0501MB1450.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([10.160.149.11]) with mapi id 15.01.0609.002; Wed, 31 Aug 2016 18:11:14 +0000
From: Kent Watsen <kwatsen@juniper.net>
To: "netmod@ietf.org" <netmod@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [netmod] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-netmod-routing-cfg-23 (until Sep 9, 2016)
Thread-Index: AQHR/8LivjdTqPfoxUWmbjRsB+ww7aBjI4mA
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2016 18:11:14 +0000
Message-ID: <4CF2F47E-ABF2-4368-8793-64E81AA02375@juniper.net>
References: <08A2A580-BEA2-4AF0-9FFB-0F995B9DC778@juniper.net>
In-Reply-To: <08A2A580-BEA2-4AF0-9FFB-0F995B9DC778@juniper.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/f.18.0.160709
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=kwatsen@juniper.net;
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-originating-ip: [66.129.241.14]
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: c35c7a6b-06dd-4c61-7151-08d3d1ca3258
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; CY1PR0501MB1450; 6:40p6o28yzdn2sRjrV0PEiTc6Nd7X5NfLT54wBuaJcPV5rhz5mlpagmXZv5gI4bMQ+JYGiKym2GmPTolFRmATGuDNShElePTjTUHXE+GM2TYrrLwAVV3815IW4Pl6FCH434zdIviYZJ2MJebkjfNZfDPa5sHeWzx+I6r7/YImxIxqephnPemcxXXgrjZk+qKdW6DlL9OdH48tf0zY+nEJoF2kJQFC7nuRBmFPBMEz4DUdrmimogN5wlVvk0scsdru6q3oZczOzb7ZDeYADHP3YWRiuKNgiPQ92Cfn2HbqIEED90JoAFJaDGf020YeBb9I/9b+y7huAaYzu6Gm0YQ0KQ==; 5:7sIquxELI3lhRkHv34nRZfrzJxv3/ag/1KYVMrx8mFFnPKKJqb9HgFqdz4VMXeLzkHUc5caIsExATNSmQOqhoysq+TdUbxohV8RB/oyuXlO2M/yduys9YxbLvind755cf8lRd665dE+IT+9OnhHFXw==; 24:zhpRQ+nfT270u2e4d81UPh1J7zZN18xnNJGZBYIErmBx/E5dJ/Azva4i6jCrrks6hRvEgRuVUlWUT10MrB+WCM1O33ysod/8+M+53awMmbA=; 7:uyD7du0i0QsuGWI51W7IRDuzvI5HLvo1X47dmaKmj3wL2yBy09sr9tSU++Bn4aUyd20+H+HmRg5IFaztYqtU7sdfsajWPhFU8PKrex62tIJeHpktekG8aTHXoRkRYNgdawdzNHN8oPt60jtF9kvO6smdd8tYmXUgNKkNETVkmSLKrYRt+pa3/jeBaVa/25XWRYEr4LBnAT/L3HaSb3J1DVRHflxs9DZg/s1Kz1UHKYZz32Ki/Q8t7uqBIke/ApL+
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:CY1PR0501MB1450;
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <CY1PR0501MB145061C14BE227E090BA9C9BA5E30@CY1PR0501MB1450.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:(20558992708506)(138986009662008)(21748063052155);
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(6040176)(601004)(2401047)(8121501046)(5005006)(10201501046)(3002001)(6055026); SRVR:CY1PR0501MB1450; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:CY1PR0501MB1450;
x-forefront-prvs: 00514A2FE6
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(6009001)(7916002)(199003)(189002)(377454003)(102836003)(2501003)(86362001)(4001350100001)(81156014)(8936002)(3280700002)(68736007)(3660700001)(11100500001)(7846002)(36756003)(106116001)(106356001)(1730700003)(7736002)(5640700001)(50986999)(2906002)(19625215002)(83716003)(2351001)(6116002)(54356999)(2900100001)(82746002)(76176999)(450100001)(99286002)(105586002)(77096005)(2950100001)(110136002)(15975445007)(101416001)(3846002)(5660300001)(107886002)(189998001)(97736004)(16236675004)(19580395003)(586003)(92566002)(66066001)(230783001)(83506001)(19580405001)(33656002)(81166006)(10400500002)(87936001)(19300405004)(5002640100001)(122556002)(8676002)(104396002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:CY1PR0501MB1450; H:CY1PR0501MB1450.namprd05.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1; LANG:en;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: juniper.net does not designate permitted sender hosts)
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_4CF2F47EABF24368879364E81AA02375junipernet_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: juniper.net
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 31 Aug 2016 18:11:14.6927 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: bea78b3c-4cdb-4130-854a-1d193232e5f4
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: CY1PR0501MB1450
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/fU2UH_vNDY7m8EulG3Kf7uScoXg>
Subject: Re: [netmod] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-netmod-routing-cfg-23 (until Sep 9, 2016)
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2016 18:11:23 -0000

[as a contributor]

My only comment on this draft is that I’d prefer it if the “routing-state” tree were moved into another YANG module, so that it could be more easily deprecated when the opstate solution comes.   I suggested this before, with regards to rfc6087bis Section 5.23, but that thread seemed to have petered out, but now here we are and my opinion remains the same.

Thanks,
Kent

From: netmod <netmod-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of Kent Watsen <kwatsen@juniper.net>
Date: Friday, August 26, 2016 at 1:54 PM
To: "netmod@ietf.org" <netmod@ietf.org>
Subject: [netmod] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-netmod-routing-cfg-23 (until Sep 9, 2016)


This is a notice to start a two-week NETMOD WG last call for the document:

                A YANG Data Model for Routing Management
                https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-netmod-routing-cfg-23

Please indicate your support or concerns by Thursday September 9, 2016.

We are not only interested in receiving defect reports, we are equally interested in statements of the form:

  * I have reviewed draft-ietf-netmod-routing-cfg-23 and I found no issues
  * I have implemented the data model in draft-ietf-netmod-routing-cfg-23
  * I am implementing the data model in draft-ietf-netmod-routing-cfg-23
  * I am considering to implement the data model in draft-ietf-netmod-routing-cfg-23

Of course, these are merely suggestions, folks can provide comments in any form that suits them.


Thank you,

NETMOD WG Chairs