Re: [netmod] WGLC on draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6991-bis-11

Kent Watsen <kent@watsen.net> Thu, 07 April 2022 08:03 UTC

Return-Path: <01000180030ca4e9-01ae2238-b266-4b88-8626-e86e05d2f8a6-000000@amazonses.watsen.net>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41CE43A1286; Thu, 7 Apr 2022 01:03:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.905
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.905 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=amazonses.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zHmqseP-I3oh; Thu, 7 Apr 2022 01:03:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from a48-92.smtp-out.amazonses.com (a48-92.smtp-out.amazonses.com [54.240.48.92]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8264B3A15A3; Thu, 7 Apr 2022 01:03:23 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/simple; s=6gbrjpgwjskckoa6a5zn6fwqkn67xbtw; d=amazonses.com; t=1649318602; h=Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:From:Mime-Version:Subject:Message-Id:Date:Cc:To:Feedback-ID; bh=mh0iyGm9RX62Y9JuhzfrE9jNB4q1qDVOV+4G2yWGNAc=; b=Kc6XFsqKq/qqvg0Zi/M12RP1SMY5spSvqHC5UXkBQ8drmGRNCFfsCD1zljtbBsM7 /AIWPQzPxIhIhVvlEKyXFUkbqPFkixDfnpfz+fcNuueY4FmaVfIxlwBn6cNhM/lVTNw KBmLiScDvhzRb+DfJqE6Bl8roiAxJmrgnqo//6UY=
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail-CD1DACB1-5668-45F1-9820-6A03D6830018"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Kent Watsen <kent@watsen.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Message-ID: <01000180030ca4e9-01ae2238-b266-4b88-8626-e86e05d2f8a6-000000@email.amazonses.com>
Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2022 08:03:22 +0000
Cc: draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6991-bis@ietf.org, netmod@ietf.org, tom petch <ietfc@btconnect.com>
To: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (18H107)
Feedback-ID: 1.us-east-1.DKmIRZFhhsBhtmFMNikgwZUWVrODEw9qVcPhqJEI2DA=:AmazonSES
X-SES-Outgoing: 2022.04.07-54.240.48.92
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/fYEMSCFzD4K3uB2KyNMWis6wI80>
Subject: Re: [netmod] WGLC on draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6991-bis-11
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2022 08:03:52 -0000


Some of both, apparently ;)  

That thread didn’t popup having a different Subject.  

Carry on.  I can revert the Datatracker state if needed. 

K. 


> Hey Kent,
> 
> Are you behind on your Emails or choosing to ignore the ongoing discussion of the ip-address, ipv4-address, and ipv6-address types?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Acee
> 
>  
> 
> From: netmod <netmod-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of Kent Watsen <kent@watsen.net>
> Date: Wednesday, April 6, 2022 at 9:25 PM
> To: "draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6991-bis@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6991-bis@ietf.org>
> Cc: "netmod@ietf.org" <netmod@ietf.org>
> Subject: Re: [netmod] WGLC on draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6991-bis-11
> 
>  
> 
> This draft has been moved out of the WG.  Now in shepherd write-up.
> 
>  
> 
> Comments:
> 
> ·         Section 4 is titled "Internet-Specific Derived Types"
> 
> o    Should it be something like "Internet Protocol Suite Types"?
> 
> ·         Many places have "Simplified BSD"
> 
> o    should be "Revised BSD"
> 
> 
> 
> ·