Re: [netmod] for a future rfc6991bis

Robert Wilton <rwilton@cisco.com> Fri, 02 November 2018 09:57 UTC

Return-Path: <rwilton@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 913BB12D4F2 for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 2 Nov 2018 02:57:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.97
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.97 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.47, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id urqaDgFvRw0f for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 2 Nov 2018 02:57:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aer-iport-1.cisco.com (aer-iport-1.cisco.com [173.38.203.51]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 043451288BD for <netmod@ietf.org>; Fri, 2 Nov 2018 02:57:30 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2994; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1541152651; x=1542362251; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:mime-version: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=7wxr9VLxkA01e24j+0p6EAQpwNXbYq+X8GnCbqQimvQ=; b=YPGZMbDXO15Tas/feQxwUt8HhqsQJoX086kgyQFqJoxEvvPCUgJ5uM+U wRbjwfW2zKwcFvREWYpFCM+pgqWIRpKgDgM+inuvFm/h3IOKgyw5Ot2Jm CD99iif70GryIsfSkxneM5Dael5Jz8D5/j5SmhHb4pyPCwGPbgu/2DZYG s=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0BCAAC/Htxb/xbLJq1gAxkBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEHAQEBAQEBgWWBW4EQbRIog3aId40YLZdAgWYNGAuEA0YCg184FgEDAQECAQECbRwBC4U7AQEBAwEBIQ8BBTYZAgkCEAgCAiMDAgIbDB8RBg0GAgEBgx0BggEPimubToEugTiCdQGBDoRXBQWBBop7gUE/gTiCa4MbAQGBLgEMBgFAJoI9glcCiRWFXpA3CYZsihkGGIFVh3aHD4lAg0WDaIZRgVohZHEzGggbFTuCbIM6AQEIgnSEYYU+PzCLAQ4XgicBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.54,455,1534809600"; d="scan'208";a="7731273"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-2.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 02 Nov 2018 09:57:28 +0000
Received: from [10.63.23.96] (dhcp-ensft1-uk-vla370-10-63-23-96.cisco.com [10.63.23.96]) by aer-core-2.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id wA29vSld025033 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Fri, 2 Nov 2018 09:57:28 GMT
To: "netmod@ietf.org" <netmod@ietf.org>
References: <A4FEB052-83A2-4823-8258-A401A0348E83@juniper.net> <87y3aejo9y.fsf@nic.cz> <20181031124643.vuaakszwepqqgooy@anna.jacobs.jacobs-university.de> <B8F9A780D330094D99AF023C5877DABA9B0CCE91@nkgeml513-mbs.china.huawei.com> <20181101120357.ny2xbn5ucubbcieo@anna.jacobs.jacobs-university.de>
From: Robert Wilton <rwilton@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <13914a03-e2a3-196d-490a-3cd8a4770654@cisco.com>
Date: Fri, 02 Nov 2018 09:57:28 +0000
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20181101120357.ny2xbn5ucubbcieo@anna.jacobs.jacobs-university.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Language: en-US
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 10.63.23.96, dhcp-ensft1-uk-vla370-10-63-23-96.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: aer-core-2.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/fdW2ltONBRj6xVQgBNNzGiQcteA>
Subject: Re: [netmod] for a future rfc6991bis
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Nov 2018 09:57:34 -0000


On 01/11/2018 12:03, Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote:
> I think we need to find a way to limit the update to types that are
> known (or expected) to be 'widely' needed. In other words, for every
> proposed type, an argument should be made why this should be included
> in RFC 6991bis.
So my view is:
- We should limit the immediate updates to RFC 6991bis to what is easy 
to define and agree on.
- We should try and get the updated module out as quickly as the IETF 
process allows.

In parallel, we could have IDs and discussion to define YANG for email 
addresses and geo locations (could we just revive Acee's draft)?  One we 
are agreed what those definitions should be we can work out the best way 
to get them published, be that in RFC6991bis, RFC6991bisbis or a 
separate RFC.

Thanks,
Rob

>
> /js
>
> On Thu, Nov 01, 2018 at 11:55:25AM +0000, Qin Wu wrote:
>> I am wondering if we can add longitude, latitude in DMS or decimal degree,
>> Further we can consider to add
>> Postal-code, Country-code like Location type.
>>
>> -Qin
>> -----邮件原件-----
>> 发件人: netmod [mailto:netmod-bounces@ietf.org] 代表 Juergen Schoenwaelder
>> 发送时间: 2018年10月31日 20:47
>> 收件人: netmod@ietf.org
>> 主题: Re: [netmod] for a future rfc6991bis
>>
>> Here is my list of possible additions. I might have lost some items on a computer that meanwhile is not used anymore, I will have to dig a bit to see what I can recover.
>>
>> /js
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 01:26:01PM +0100, Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> another update that was discussed recently is a clarification of the
>>> XPath context for the xpath1.0 type.
>>>
>>> Lada
>>>
>>> Kent Watsen <kwatsen@juniper.net> writes:
>>>
>>>> NETMOD WG,
>>>>
>>>> A conversation in NETCONF WG regarding the yang-push noted that it
>>>> might be time to update RFC 6991, in particular to introduce a type for time-duration.
>>>>
>>>>    
>>>> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netconf/KaUJloIShkLNIXTuHZNwB-
>>>> SYBnQ
>>>>
>>>> In addition, it might be good to introduce [inet?] types for RFC
>>>> 5322 (Internet Message Format) including perhaps:
>>>>
>>>>    - email-address        (addr-spec, per Section 3.4.1)
>>>>    - named-email-address  (name-addr, per Section 3.4)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Kent // contributor
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> netmod mailing list
>>>> netmod@ietf.org
>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
>>> --
>>> Ladislav Lhotka
>>> Head, CZ.NIC Labs
>>> PGP Key ID: 0xB8F92B08A9F76C67
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> netmod mailing list
>>> netmod@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
>> -- 
>> Juergen Schoenwaelder           Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH
>> Phone: +49 421 200 3587         Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany
>> Fax:   +49 421 200 3103         <https://www.jacobs-university.de/>