Re: [netmod] Stephen Farrell's No Objection on draft-ietf-netmod-yang-json-09: (with COMMENT)

Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com> Tue, 22 March 2016 14:59 UTC

Return-Path: <bclaise@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B73A412D641; Tue, 22 Mar 2016 07:59:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.522
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.522 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3TW8Ws74ToX9; Tue, 22 Mar 2016 07:59:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aer-iport-2.cisco.com (aer-iport-2.cisco.com [173.38.203.52]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E2D2612D913; Tue, 22 Mar 2016 07:59:10 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1489; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1458658751; x=1459868351; h=subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date: mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=B/Mq11h+YoGjGJ3l4CLK9ZtEWm40ZBmtcTWtHPnGe84=; b=Mdcr6G2K5APvceFpFEs5FUqVhRClfuewGs+5p5vdGeKi7TQfntBtAF16 hzgGc4+cYu9Ak+h4Qx9QExGQXmUxKhDopgClCyPPXjHVvyMX4x2NxRvwT ZhfJWAXqV0qoYJovtqgfa0CHarHr/JO1En4IOLJjK4G2o1DmTsfCw/DBi k=;
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.24,377,1454976000"; d="scan'208";a="633635159"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-1.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 22 Mar 2016 14:59:09 +0000
Received: from [10.60.67.86] (ams-bclaise-8915.cisco.com [10.60.67.86]) by aer-core-1.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u2MEx9Ih021320; Tue, 22 Mar 2016 14:59:09 GMT
To: Ladislav Lhotka <lhotka@nic.cz>, Jürgen Schönwälder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de>
References: <20160317113347.3650.38937.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <m2d1qnj2ec.fsf@birdie.labs.nic.cz> <20160321151914.GA62880@elstar.local> <56F0137B.3090103@cisco.com> <72154E94-3C00-438B-B177-35DB9216DF03@juniper.net> <56F02B21.3080103@cisco.com> <20160322081043.GA64402@elstar.local> <7DA81401-6AE5-4DCA-A8C7-3B41ED5B2C06@nic.cz>
From: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <56F15DBC.5050905@cisco.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2016 15:59:08 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <7DA81401-6AE5-4DCA-A8C7-3B41ED5B2C06@nic.cz>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/fucllPrP47G_g_f9A7S-t_03dS4>
Cc: "netmod-chairs@ietf.org" <netmod-chairs@ietf.org>, "netmod@ietf.org" <netmod@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-netmod-yang-json@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-netmod-yang-json@ietf.org>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
Subject: Re: [netmod] Stephen Farrell's No Objection on draft-ietf-netmod-yang-json-09: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2016 14:59:18 -0000

On 3/22/2016 9:47 AM, Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
>> On 22 Mar 2016, at 09:10, Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de> wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 06:10:57PM +0100, Eliot Lear wrote:
>>> Hi Kent,
>>>
>>> Thanks for the pointer.  The zeroconf draft is cool beans to be sure.
>>> That describes an enrollment mechanism for devices that make use of
>>> 802.1AR.  Very ANIMAesque.  What I'm suggesting, and perhaps it's a bit
>>> late for this draft, is just a statement in this draft along the lines
>>> that "signing and verifying happens at the JSON level; see [ref] for how
>>> to do it", and for extra credit an example would be exceedingly cool.
>>> That way we as developers know what to do (again, I'm neither a JSON nor
>>> netmod expert - just trying to make use of what's there for what I am
>>> expert at (or so I think)).
>>>
>> This I-D is an object encoding specification. Why would this document
>> have to talk about possible object signatures?
> +1
>
> These issues are important but they should IMO be dealt with separately.
Ok. Where should it be described? RFC6087bis?

Regards, Benoit
>
> Thanks, Lada
>
>> /js
>>
>> -- 
>> Juergen Schoenwaelder           Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH
>> Phone: +49 421 200 3587         Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany
>> Fax:   +49 421 200 3103         <http://www.jacobs-university.de/>
> --
> Ladislav Lhotka, CZ.NIC Labs
> PGP Key ID: E74E8C0C
>
>
>
>
> .
>