IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [netmod] Confirming draft-ietf-netmod-module-tags-03 consensus call

joel jaeggli <joelja@gmail.com> Tue, 13 November 2018 00:03 UTC

Return-Path: <joelja@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7332130DC2 for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 Nov 2018 16:03:06 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lOzS3-PFNTgn for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 Nov 2018 16:03:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pg1-x52a.google.com (mail-pg1-x52a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::52a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 10430128CE4 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Mon, 12 Nov 2018 16:03:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pg1-x52a.google.com with SMTP id z10so4784125pgp.7 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Mon, 12 Nov 2018 16:03:05 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=xDlu9U8PlUUq7t7J3nBAsFpniFsIbJnqxYOfAHKBN9g=; b=TQLAGIBOTfQhg5Qzs1tShAZh8DDR/kfpX40ej1pknKjJ5WOrngDlqwB6Un1q2jY1MQ SV/ZYNvoIaJmgTkcNN2d72Zigu9QB678WR8DQ6R4VuQd3azw5oa7PpZcsBM6BOq9GoaX QlLlmxEd5SAdc1qcbtAIZQ+zO14ebhsu8uAM3In06MjLKstE0wSQtH7myMUWmaJvmCiD Utv5Fjsl4ri6ADmvRsma8veWEwhJbFYH+ZzTl0X+t2ZaZPrD7cWgDYw2A/VRScEKdvnu OyHrrH/hlwgDQA5tCdFtEUMOnCkfGaNetjhWK3dSmDyELkyVHGfARzzCEQkkXl5UqNzI BNvA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=xDlu9U8PlUUq7t7J3nBAsFpniFsIbJnqxYOfAHKBN9g=; b=ZxAJJ2L8iiFJdOxpgQhuJQo5SQSOvOxgGVpuPlg+DJPAjeLxGcSSU/Mx5MZBbgcovX +/8RA6Q2wod/H4FOhc28i8jDdUxoyhYwIEuvojHElHuEvfY1wrJDfRxtFydR/udIrA1S lY59JEBA/9PSA22InVwo6AMS0tOo12Sc7Eqc+fTZ6vuaytoOuFR9nAI2g6yCRy3jKV+p yzZvHBi8BXKCz8PeqEvPDTPDnODHY5Mf6vPx4qvZbwThJzRcTBhcNw21Dv8Gn6YXlqjD mMxGdTOYp4WsDWfPdA/ozaifq5iJhFLF3js2bYWXdT/g72uvHCMlny6RSZiMU+W1E2rW G6eA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AGRZ1gIb+hpejgGIKtqhc7+JlEzOP6lCZIExM6pMTuMKFpgc9pplMgHE 338r/RKR4XqaFhyvk2/KRoCeEMev
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AJdET5fkBtod2pTz8XN/3DQoTVoFoVezfgVSXBjMcHkmvMisVUHtoLlDr33hqEaDWvCdiZd2/dQGIw==
X-Received: by 2002:a62:1d14:: with SMTP id d20mr2826710pfd.221.1542067384331; Mon, 12 Nov 2018 16:03:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.0.109] (c-73-202-177-209.hsd1.ca.comcast.net. [73.202.177.209]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d3sm16268447pgl.64.2018.11.12.16.03.03 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 12 Nov 2018 16:03:03 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.1 \(3445.101.1\))
From: joel jaeggli <joelja@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <1542065815557.72600@Aviatnet.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2018 16:02:56 -0800
Cc: NETMOD Working Group <netmod@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <D5118C26-A81A-4C8C-84A9-2010F3F7334B@gmail.com>
References: <8C4CE813-D0D1-4F4F-B813-B451D9A8D8DF@gmail.com> <1542065815557.72600@Aviatnet.com>
To: Alex Campbell <Alex.Campbell@Aviatnet.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.101.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/fwx5Ju-1zNDQENKYVaa8uqlia_s>
Subject: Re: [netmod] Confirming draft-ietf-netmod-module-tags-03 consensus call
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2018 00:03:07 -0000


> On Nov 12, 2018, at 15:36, Alex Campbell <Alex.Campbell@Aviatnet.com> wrote:
> 
> Perhaps my opinion also carries less weight, as someone who's only on the mailing list and didn't actually attend the IETF meeting.
> 


So, the reason we take the discussion back to the list is precisely to insure that we capture the opinions of those not present in the working group meeting. I think that is a point to be addressed separately from the question of whether the document is ready to go or not.

Thanks
Joel

v2.29.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status