[netmod] NMDA FAQ

Robert Wilton <rwilton@cisco.com> Wed, 20 September 2017 13:28 UTC

Return-Path: <rwilton@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9884F1332D5 for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Sep 2017 06:28:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.501
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.501 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4HPIeh3HSXGw for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Sep 2017 06:28:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aer-iport-2.cisco.com (aer-iport-2.cisco.com [173.38.203.52]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B113213214D for <netmod@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Sep 2017 06:28:01 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=853; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1505914081; x=1507123681; h=to:from:subject:message-id:date:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding; bh=tR+4+0TZVnWsrI8jMSa8ddOY79bBZROQ0f22J4y0s3c=; b=RQH1wVSh28twt6m51pkVnZTDjqcksqNzexe8u5/ieQ0Lqy/njD+4hMMi Ngk5ZGi9oIvw7D1pblsfsqLiEkLbIch7iRCyw4LMEhiu6unB36o6NxcyU DiGPOFunAbZ2Dt7j1wbRWWAZwCE/ePkXHbn8/9ppRHdizzAE6+0znNGjv g=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0ABAgCda8JZ/xbLJq1cGgEBAQECAQEBAQgBAQEBhD5uhByLFJBKmGMKH4pFFAECAQEBAQEBAWsdC4VCDwEFM0MCJgJDHA0IAQEQih8QqA2CJ4scAQEBBwEBAQEBAQEcBYEOgh2DU4FkK4sLgmAFoQ+HXYx6ghOJRIckigGDYIdXgTk2IUFMMiEIHBWHZj+JTgEBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.42,421,1500940800"; d="scan'208";a="654765534"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-4.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 20 Sep 2017 13:27:59 +0000
Received: from [10.63.23.66] (dhcp-ensft1-uk-vla370-10-63-23-66.cisco.com [10.63.23.66]) by aer-core-4.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v8KDRxnh025007 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Sep 2017 13:27:59 GMT
To: "netmod@ietf.org" <netmod@ietf.org>
From: Robert Wilton <rwilton@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <7a2c2ef4-f572-44a1-f1cd-74febdaa15ca@cisco.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2017 14:27:59 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/g-R-7SPiwjgHe3S909bqkYmT6R4>
Subject: [netmod] NMDA FAQ
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2017 13:28:04 -0000

Hi,

The NMDA authors have put together a NMDA related FAQ that is available at:

https://github.com/netmod-wg/FAQ/wiki

The hope is that this can be a community maintained and updated FAQ 
relating to NMDA in particular and YANG in general, with the desire that 
it represents the best current practice knowledge from all of the people 
who contribute their knowledge and expertise to the NETMOD WG alias.

At the moment, it is using github wiki pages, but we are considering 
changing it to use a regular Github repository.  The hope is that we can 
make it relatively easy to update whilst maintaining sensible change 
control.  If the current approach gets a positive reception then we will 
try and incorporate the relevant questions from the existing YANG FAQ to 
this location as well.

[Nice] feedback is welcome ;-)

Rob