IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [netmod] tree diagram guidelines

Martin Bjorklund <mbj@tail-f.com> Fri, 08 December 2017 09:25 UTC

Return-Path: <mbj@tail-f.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A26C6124D37 for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Dec 2017 01:25:34 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Zy88kEjBaIez for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Dec 2017 01:25:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.tail-f.com (mail.tail-f.com [46.21.102.45]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 230561200CF for <netmod@ietf.org>; Fri, 8 Dec 2017 01:25:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (h-85-209.A165.priv.bahnhof.se [94.254.85.209]) by mail.tail-f.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0DFD31AE0398; Fri, 8 Dec 2017 10:25:32 +0100 (CET)
Date: Fri, 08 Dec 2017 10:25:31 +0100
Message-Id: <20171208.102531.577590682418567643.mbj@tail-f.com>
To: j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de
Cc: lberger@labn.net, netmod@ietf.org
From: Martin Bjorklund <mbj@tail-f.com>
In-Reply-To: <20171208072110.37qd5s57ccgqt5jt@elstar.local>
References: <20171117070043.pm7rn25yj3hxum3q@elstar.local> <4df13805-f4c8-89da-f986-64da816bea0b@labn.net> <20171208072110.37qd5s57ccgqt5jt@elstar.local>
X-Mailer: Mew version 6.7 on Emacs 24.5 / Mule 6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/gCRuGFh0orSJTAegFYPuxGDcM44>
Subject: Re: [netmod] tree diagram guidelines
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Dec 2017 09:25:34 -0000

Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de> wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 07, 2017 at 06:38:14PM -0500, Lou Berger wrote:
> > 
> > This leaves the intended status as the key open issue on the draft.
> >
> 
> Have the suggestions for including a collapsed view of uses been
> included?

No, not yet.

> Related to the status, I do think that the reference to YANG [RFC7950]
> should be normative - other BCP documents also have normative
> references and frankly this document talks a lot about YANG constructs
> and hence it really has more than in informative dependency on YANG.

I agree.

> Is someone tracking issues somewhere?

Not in a tracker, no.  Just manually.


/martin

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email