Re: [netmod] removing a node from a grouping

Robert Wilton <rwilton@cisco.com> Mon, 16 July 2018 13:33 UTC

Return-Path: <rwilton@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FAAD12F1A6 for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Jul 2018 06:33:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.509
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.509 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4xo1eGUTADGb for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Jul 2018 06:33:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aer-iport-2.cisco.com (aer-iport-2.cisco.com [173.38.203.52]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F3DEE1294D0 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Mon, 16 Jul 2018 06:33:56 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=6065; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1531748037; x=1532957637; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:mime-version: in-reply-to; bh=OQyygb6Q2d6JC2nuu5jl7od0OH+d95Ik6QRxDm7MHKw=; b=FxYE+ui3k8p1zeP6yhkT7Mie8eG/G/5ww1LG7jSOuN2Ue2K2ZZ6va/Ta 8BAp0AWNjLlDsXSj2PTR8kN1sFx7vjC7SW34TyQV7OKZ5JKpUfUxrf9fK gpMRREpvEWab2ZNG5aSpptptayNV75TNuW7VDXR2T2W73C356H0qib1KD 4=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0DsAQAunkxb/xbLJq1cGgEBAQEBAgEBAQEIAQEBAYJTgVltEiiDfIhjjWeQKocJCxgBCoQDRgKDATcVAQIBAQIBAQJtHAyFNgEBAQMBAQEhSxsLDgoqAgInMAYBDAYCAQEXgwUBgXcID6h/gS4fhDyFXwWKWT+BOIJqgxkBAQKEX4JVAplcCY8hBogchUmMP4VVgVcigVIzGggbFTuCaYsVhVojMAGOGwEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.51,361,1526342400"; d="scan'208,217";a="5205406"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-4.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 16 Jul 2018 13:33:55 +0000
Received: from [10.61.227.226] ([10.61.227.226]) by aer-core-4.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id w6GDXsv8016878; Mon, 16 Jul 2018 13:33:54 GMT
To: Kent Watsen <kwatsen@juniper.net>, "netmod@ietf.org" <netmod@ietf.org>
References: <C16EE3E0-D7B6-486F-8224-F1CC7B224A1D@juniper.net> <80f2c076-1937-9b09-fdec-a4d4c9a16aa5@cisco.com> <878t6bcq8j.fsf@nic.cz>
From: Robert Wilton <rwilton@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <ecf87f89-5ca1-fa0b-074a-3356a5249a1b@cisco.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2018 09:33:53 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <878t6bcq8j.fsf@nic.cz>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------E685620384410FE98F04A4C3"
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/gVdHbWxDcZvCeELB9Tt_OQi7sMM>
Subject: Re: [netmod] removing a node from a grouping
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2018 13:34:00 -0000

Hi Lada,


On 16/07/2018 08:35, Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
> Robert Wilton <rwilton=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org> writes:
>
>> Hi Kent,
>>
>> I'm not sure that sec 7.13.2 of 7950 allows refine to add a when
>> statement, although an equivalent solution would be refine it with an
>> if-feature statement for a feature that is never enabled.
> Neither "when" nor "if-feature" is permitted as a substatement of
> "refine".
My reading of 7950, is that you are allowed to refine a node to add an 
"if-feature".

RFC 7950, section 7.13.2:

The following refinements can be done:

...

    o  A leaf, leaf-list, list, container, choice, case, anydata, or
       anyxml node may get additional "if-feature" expressions.


Thanks,
Rob

>
> Lada
>
>> Ideally, I think that the groupings would be split up, so that they
>> build on each other.
>>
>>     grouping "foo" {
>>       container-or-leaf "foo" { ... }
>>     }
>>
>>     grouping "bar-etc" {
>>       container-or-leaf "bar" { ... }
>>       ...  // the "etc" ;)
>>     }
>>
>>     grouping "foo-bar-etc" {
>>       grouping "foo";
>>       grouping "bar-etc";
>>     }
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Rob
>>
>> On 11/07/2018 18:30, Kent Watsen wrote:
>>> Say there is:
>>>
>>>     grouping "foo-bar-etc" {
>>>       container-or-leaf "foo" { ... }
>>>       container-or-leaf "bar" { ... }
>>>       ...  // the "etc" ;)
>>>     }
>>>
>>> And the goal is to use the grouping sans the "foo" node.
>>> Can a "when" statement that always evaluates to "false"
>>> do it?
>>>
>>>     grouping "bar-etc" {
>>>       uses "foo-bar-etc" {
>>>         refine "listen" {
>>>           when "false()";
>>>         }
>>>       }
>>>     }
>>>
>>> Any better ideas?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Kent
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> netmod mailing list
>>> netmod@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
>>> .
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> netmod mailing list
>> netmod@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod