[netmod] YANG versioning solution comparison draft

Robert Wilton <rwilton@cisco.com> Fri, 26 October 2018 08:38 UTC

Return-Path: <rwilton@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DA35128CE4 for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 26 Oct 2018 01:38:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.501
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.501 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FgJ_HBbZvXAI for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 26 Oct 2018 01:38:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aer-iport-2.cisco.com (aer-iport-2.cisco.com [173.38.203.52]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B2946127AC2 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Fri, 26 Oct 2018 01:38:01 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2754; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1540543081; x=1541752681; h=from:subject:to:message-id:date:mime-version; bh=X2FnZLuSa9oxtKW7YKkuUOKyDHoIYpMtkFnKWZBZtXs=; b=ILxtLHyzKGuI9QHsf5ju5o1gthC1AFylOg4U1L75giBtDJyo+rHovS58 5ce+Kevc1ASOwjne3y4Ssp+V7BXC2BS4wQJOshT2l40Ozj2AJJndnLEMb OqJ9FIWcuQIk8viWoIklESr0vEv5ZXC+eOspCraI3ZkNDJEntCzVcesLA Y=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0DTAgDP0NJb/xbLJq1jHAEBAQQBAQc?= =?us-ascii?q?EAQGBZYJrbRKEHYh3jSCRd4dEDSOHfzgWAQMBAQIBAQJtHAELhWR1AT0CXw0?= =?us-ascii?q?IAQEXgwYBggEPl0+OZYEuFAuEH0A9hF0Fi36BQT+BOAyFegIDAYRhglcCiSK?= =?us-ascii?q?VWQmGaYoQBgIWiT6HBoxrg1mGTIFaIYFVMxoIGxWDKIsYhT8+jVkBAQ?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.54,427,1534809600"; d="scan'208,217";a="7546491"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-4.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 26 Oct 2018 08:37:59 +0000
Received: from [10.63.23.63] (dhcp-ensft1-uk-vla370-10-63-23-63.cisco.com [10.63.23.63]) by aer-core-4.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id w9Q8bxwk027904 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Fri, 26 Oct 2018 08:37:59 GMT
From: Robert Wilton <rwilton@cisco.com>
To: "netmod@ietf.org" <netmod@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <15467555-2244-9cd1-f47e-97271450c750@cisco.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2018 09:37:59 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------712C7D35E55E894961220410"
Content-Language: en-US
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 10.63.23.63, dhcp-ensft1-uk-vla370-10-63-23-63.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: aer-core-4.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/gXSHj5ZSMSKNNDX4fPSBP55_YY8>
Subject: [netmod] YANG versioning solution comparison draft
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2018 08:38:03 -0000

The YANG versioning design team has spent the last few months refining 
some of the requirements and discussing and debating various solutions.  
I would like to thank everyone on the design team who has spent time on 
this and participated in this effort.

To this end we have produced an interim draft, 
draft-verdt-netmod-yang-solutions 
<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-verdt-netmod-yang-solutions/>, 
that describes some of the solutions to the key problems that we have 
been discussing.

The draft is quite rough around the edges, but is only expected be a 
transient working document.  I shall be presenting some of the content 
to the WG in the Thursday Netmod session.  The draft itself purposely 
does not recommend any particular solution at this time, but the design 
team would welcome feedback from the working group on their thoughts and 
views of the various potential solutions, particularly if their are 
additional pros/cons of those solutions that are not captured in the draft.

Thanks,
Rob