Re: [netmod] WGLC on draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6991-bis-11

[Andy Bierman <[e-mail]>]

On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 4:34 PM Kent Watsen <[e-mail]> wrote:

> All,
>
> 1) If you provided WGLC comments on this draft, please review the -12 diff
> <https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6991-bis-12.txt> to
> ensure that the updates made are good.
>
> 2) Juergen notes below that he also removed the "revision-identifier"
> typedef, as it is better
> defined in the YANG versioning module.  Any objections?
>
>
Sorry for the late comment.
I think Juergen listed one option as "rename to revision-date and leave it
in this module".
I support this option.

There is no chance that the revision date format will be changing any time
soon.
This is useful for general applications because revision date is widely
used.


Andy





> On both points above, if no objections are raised in the next week, we'll
> assume consensus to move forward.
>
>
> Juergen, you will be posting a -13 containing Martin's URI "pattern"
> statement when the submission window reopens?
>
> Kent // as co-chair and shepherd
>
>
>
> On Mar 7, 2022, at 11:10 AM, Jürgen Schönwälder <
> [e-mail]> wrote:
>
> Kent,
>
> I have posted -12, which fixes the bugs that have been reported to me
> and removes the percentage types.
>
> I have also removed the revision-identifier type since it is better
> defined in the YANG versioning module (and it should be called
> revision-date and not revision-identifier). This change was not
> suggested during the last call, I only noticed that this definition
> could be moved while reviewing the YANG versioning I-Ds over the
> weekend. This change probably requires a check with the WG. (If we
> were to put it back, I would still suggest to call it revision-date as
> this is also how this thing is called in RFC 7950).
>
> /js
>
> On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 11:34:19PM +0000, Kent Watsen wrote:
>
> Thank you everyone that participated, the Last Call for this draft is
> closed successfully!
>
> Authors, please let the chairs know when the issues have been resolved and
> the draft is ready to be progressed for IESG review.
>
> Kent
>
>
>
> On Feb 3, 2022, at 9:54 PM, Kent Watsen <[e-mail]> wrote:
>
> Dear NETMOD WG,
>
> This message begins a two-week WGLC for draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6991-bis-11
> ending on Friday, February 18th.  Here is a direct link to the HTML version
> of the draft:
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6991-bis-11.html
>
> Positive comments, e.g., "I've reviewed this document and believe it is
> ready for publication", are welcome!  This is useful and important, even
> from authors.  Objections, concerns, and suggestions are also welcomed at
> this time.
>
> Thank you,
> Kent (as co-chair)
>
> _______________________________________________
> netmod mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> netmod mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
>
>
> --
> Jürgen Schönwälder              Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH
> Phone: [phone]         Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany
> Fax:   [phone]         <https://www.jacobs-university.de/>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> netmod mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
>