IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [netmod] intended status of the tree diagram document

Ladislav Lhotka <lhotka@nic.cz> Wed, 15 November 2017 13:46 UTC

Return-Path: <lhotka@nic.cz>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97574126DED for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Nov 2017 05:46:34 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nic.cz
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1y5MRFbmaier for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Nov 2017 05:46:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.nic.cz (mail.nic.cz [217.31.204.67]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 825D4126579 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Nov 2017 05:46:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from birdie (unknown [IPv6:2001:67c:1232:144:1a4f:a84b:2bfd:c611]) by mail.nic.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3FBCD6446A for <netmod@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Nov 2017 14:46:31 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=nic.cz; s=default; t=1510753591; bh=lC/zvTi4dM42RiQQmQZnquALHnPXICdKI/Y/L0rUfeY=; h=From:To:Date; b=IgsbyaTACn/04LWJypyj1EuQj3/w8P39JPqJQQOavoOcx/yZLh7ov8yXdGMYn/n4h 6zVEWOlYgSqY5YeqNpCnUJGZfjdOJLE36rDWj1DIh689gmlfw7N6Mw4DEqPEdCEZ47 yZwdPYq9kw62kvJ2WGLm+XaatWeAY6TnKKgIMdcQ=
Message-ID: <1510753658.21877.54.camel@nic.cz>
From: Ladislav Lhotka <lhotka@nic.cz>
To: netmod@ietf.org
Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2017 21:47:38 +0800
In-Reply-To: <20171115130803.k7bqhj625tsnmd4i@elstar.local>
References: <20171115.135818.591114714397486064.mbj@tail-f.com> <20171115130803.k7bqhj625tsnmd4i@elstar.local>
Organization: CZ.NIC
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Mailer: Evolution 3.26.2
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.99.2 at mail
X-Virus-Status: Clean
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/gv18V2vvzfZdai96EeC9973W7wc>
Subject: Re: [netmod] intended status of the tree diagram document
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2017 13:46:35 -0000

On Wed, 2017-11-15 at 14:08 +0100, Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 01:58:18PM +0100, Martin Bjorklund wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > Currently, draft-ietf-netmod-yang-tree-diagrams has intended status
> > Standards Track.  I think I heard during the meeting today that it
> > ought to be Informational.  I think this makes sense.  It would then
> > imply that other standards track documents will have the tree diagram
> > document as an informative reference.
> > 
> > Should we make this change?
> > 
> 
> Makes sense to me. I could ask what you will do with the RFC 2119
> language in the ID but hey I do not ask these questions anymore. ;-)

+1

2119 terms should be replaced with plain words.

Lada

> 
> /js
> 
-- 
Ladislav Lhotka
Head, CZ.NIC Labs
PGP Key ID: 0xB8F92B08A9F76C67

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email