[netmod] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6991 (7062)

RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Fri, 29 July 2022 17:32 UTC

To: j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de, warren@kumari.net, rwilton@cisco.com, kent+ietf@watsen.net, joelja@bogus.com, lberger@labn.net
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: mazhar.rana@sophos.com, netmod@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20220729173227.6621F4C29E@rfcpa.amsl.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2022 10:32:27 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/h3UFcVmLsusQl6mm8sZ_HaXwz_4>
Subject: [netmod] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6991 (7062)
Precedence: list

The following errata report has been submitted for RFC6991,
"Common YANG Data Types".

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7062

--------------------------------------
Type: Technical
Reported by: Mazhar Rana <mazhar.rana@sophos.com>

Section: 4

Original Text
-------------
     typedef ipv4-address-no-zone {
       type inet:ipv4-address {
         pattern '[0-9\.]*';
       }
       description
         "An IPv4 address without a zone index.  This type, derived from
          ipv4-address, may be used in situations where the zone is
          known from the context and hence no zone index is needed.";
     }

Corrected Text
--------------
     typedef ipv4-address-no-zone {
       type inet:ipv4-address {
         pattern '(([0-9]|[1-9][0-9]|1[0-9][0-9]|2[0-4][0-9]|25[0-5])\.){3}'
         +  '([0-9]|[1-9][0-9]|1[0-9][0-9]|2[0-4][0-9]|25[0-5])';
       }
       description
         "An IPv4 address without a zone index.  This type, derived from
          ipv4-address, may be used in situations where the zone is
          known from the context and hence no zone index is needed.";
     }

Notes
-----
As per RFC 4001, dotted decimal format of IPv4 address is typically written in decimal digits, formatted as four 8-bit fields that are separated by periods.

Instructions:
-------------
This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party  
can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 

--------------------------------------
RFC6991 (draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6021-bis-03)
--------------------------------------
Title               : Common YANG Data Types
Publication Date    : July 2013
Author(s)           : J. Schoenwaelder, Ed.
Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
Source              : Network Modeling
Area                : Operations and Management
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG

[netmod] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6991 (706… RFC Errata System
Re: [netmod] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6991 … Jürgen Schönwälder
Re: [netmod] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6991 … Rob Wilton (rwilton)